Commissioner v. Sunnen

Commissioner v. Sunnen
Commissioner v. Sunnen
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued December 17, 1947
Decided April 5, 1948
Full case name Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Sunnen
Citations 333 U.S. 591 (more)
68 S.Ct. 715
Subsequent history Cert to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Holding
The general rule of res judicata applies to tax proceedings involving the same claim and the same tax year, while the doctrine of collateral estoppel, which is a narrower version of the res judicata rule, applies to tax proceedings involving similar or unlike claims and different tax years.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority J. Murphy, joined by unanimous

Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591 (1948), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1948 in which the Court outlined the scope of collateral estoppel or estoppel by judgment in determinations of federal tax liability. This was important because a single controversial circumstance may have a bearing on income tax liability for several years. Res judicata, as part of the doctrine of judicial finality, protects a taxpayer's tax liability for a given year once the taxpayer wins a judgment in court. The judgment is not only controlling with regard to the issues litigated, but also any issues that could have been raised which would have affected the determination of tax liability for the year. But of course, a single controversial circumstance may have a bearing on income tax liability for several years, and if a judgment fixes liability for one of the years, res judicata only forecloses the reopening of that year's liability. But the related doctrine of collateral estoppel prevents relitigation of issues that were in fact raised and decided in the earlier litigation, even when they arise in a new cause of action, such as a dispute as to liability for a later year.

However, the Supreme Court said that collateral estoppel in determinations of tax liability "must be confined to situations where the matter raised in the second suit is identical in all respects with that decided in the first proceeding and where the controlling facts and applicable legal rules remain unchanged."[1]

References

  1. ^ Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591, 599-600.

See also

External links

  • Text of Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591 (1948) is available from: Justia
  • Goldstein, "Res judicata and collateral estoppel," 54 A.B.A.J. 1131 (1968)

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

  • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 333 — This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 333 of the United States Reports :* Le Maistre v. Leffers , ussc|333|1|1948 * Fong Haw Tan v. Phelan , ussc|333|6|1948 * Johnson v. United States , ussc|333|10|1948 * United… …   Wikipedia

  • Privity (law) — Privity is a well established component of the federal law of res judicata. A privy is bound with respect to all the issues that were raised or could have been raised in the previouslawsuit. Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 U.S. 591, 597, 68 S. Ct.… …   Wikipedia

  • Scouting in Illinois — has a long and rich tradition, from the 1910s to the present day, serving thousands of youth in programs that suit the environment in which they live. Illinois is the homestate of the BSA founder, W.D. Boyce. Contents 1 Early history (1910 1950)… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”