Clark v. Commissioner

Clark v. Commissioner

Clark v. Commissioner, 40 B.T.A. 333, 335 (B.T.A. 1939) was an important early United States income tax case.

Contents

Background

Facts

The taxpayers, husband and wife, made an irrevocable election to file a joint federal income tax return rather than separate returns on the advice of their return preparer. Subsequently, the Service examined the return and assessed a deficiency against the taxpayers. The deficiency existed because the return preparer took a larger deduction from income for capital losses than was allowed by law. If the taxpayers had filed separate returns employing the proper deduction for long-term capital losses, their combined tax liability would have been $19,941.10 less than the amount they paid on their joint return. As recompense for his error, the return preparer indemnified the taxpayers in that amount.

Deficiency assessed

The Service included the indemnification payment in taxpayers’ income as an amount attributable to the return preparer’s payment of the taxpayer’s income tax liability.

Opinion of the court

The Board rejected the Service’s argument that this payment was income and stated that “[p]etitioner’s taxes were not paid for him by any person . . . [h]e paid his own taxes. . . .The [money] was paid to petitioner, not qua taxes, . . . but as compensation for his loss.” 40 B.T.A. at 335. The fact that the underlying obligation was for taxes “is of no moment here.” Id.

References

Clark v. Commissioner, 40 B.T.A. 333, 335 (B.T.A. 1939) Federal income Tax by Klein, Bankman, Shaviro, Stark

Current legal status: the ultimate grounds for the decision in Clark, that the payment received by the taxpayer from his tax preparer was not "derived from capitol, from labor, or from both combined," is no longer good law. See Glenshaw glass Co. v. Commissioner.

HOWEVER, the holding in Clark does remain good law. In other words, the reasoning the court used is no longer valid, but the result would be the same today, just for different reasons.


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужен реферат?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Clark W. McDonnell — North Dakota Public Service Commissioner In office January 1, 1941 – December 31, 1950 Preceded by …   Wikipedia

  • Commissioner v. LoBue — Supreme Court of the United States Argued May 6, 1956 Decided May 28, 1956 …   Wikipedia

  • Clark Jolley — Clark Jolley, 2004 Oklahoma State Senator In office 2004 – Present Preceded by Mark Snyder Constituency 41st Senate District Personal details …   Wikipedia

  • Commissioner Service — Owner Boy Sco …   Wikipedia

  • Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. — Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. Supreme Court of the United States Argued February 28, 1955 Decide …   Wikipedia

  • Commissioner v. Duberstein — Supreme Court of the United States Argued March 23, 1960 Decided June 13 …   Wikipedia

  • Clark v. C.C.N.V. — Clark v. C.C.N.V. Supreme Court of the United States Argued March 21, 1984 Decided June 29, 1984 …   Wikipedia

  • Clark, George Rogers — born Nov. 19, 1752, Albemarle county, Va. died Feb. 13, 1818, near Louisville, Ky., U.S. Frontier military leader in the American Revolution. The brother of William Clark, he worked as a surveyor in Kentucky in the mid 1770s. During the… …   Universalium

  • Clark County Commission (Nevada) — The Clark County Board of County Commissioners is the governmental organization that runs the unincorporated areas of Clark County, Nevada. The commission is considered by many to be the most powerful governmental body in the state of Nevada.[1]… …   Wikipedia

  • Clark Reservation State Park — Glacier Lake and the cliff of the fossil waterfall in September. Clark Reservation State Park is a state park in Onondaga County, New York. The park is in the Town of DeWitt, south of Syracuse. It wa …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”