- The Labours of Hercules
Infobox Book |
name = The Labours of Hercules
title_orig =
translator =
image_caption = Dust-jacket illustration of the US (true first) edition. See "Publication history" (below) for UK first edition jacket image.
author =Agatha Christie
illustrator =
cover_artist = Not known
country =United States
language = English
series =
genre =Crime novel
publisher =Dodd, Mead and Company
release_date = 1947
media_type = Print (Hardback &Paperback )
pages = 265 pp (first edition, hardback)
isbn =
preceded_by =Come, Tell Me How You Live
followed_by =Taken at the Flood "The Labours of Hercules" is a
short story collection written byAgatha Christie and first published in in the US byDodd, Mead and Company in 1947 [John Cooper and B.A. Pyke. "Detective Fiction - the collector's guide": Second Edition (Pages 82 and 88) Scholar Press. 1994. ISBN 0-85967-991-8] [http://home.insightbb.com/~jsmarcum/agatha45.htm American Tribute to Agatha Christie] ] and in the UK byCollins Crime Club in September of the same yearChris Peers, Ralph Spurrier and Jamie Sturgeon. "Collins Crime Club – A checklist of First Editions". Dragonby Press (Second Edition) March 1999 (Page 15)] . The US edition retailed at$ 2.50 and the UK edition at eightshillings and sixpence (8/6).It features Belgian detective
Hercule Poirot , and gives an account of twelve cases with which he intends to close his career as a private detective. His regular sidekicks (his secretary, Miss Lemon, andvalet , Georges) make cameo appearances, as doesChief Inspector Japp . The stories were all first published in periodicals between1939 and1947 .In the Foreword to the volume, Poirot declares that he will carefully choose the cases in order to conform to the mythological sequence of the
Twelve Labours ofHercules . In some cases (such as "The Nemean Lion") the connection is a highly tenuous one, while in others the choice of case is more or less forced upon Poirot by circumstances. By the end, "The Capture of Cerebus" has events that correspond with the twelfth labour with almost self-satirical convenience.Plot summaries
Foreword
Hercule Poirot is enjoying a social visit by Dr Burton, a fellow of All Souls who turns the conversation round to the subject of Poirot's unusual
Christian name and how some of thepagan names parents give to their children do not suit their recipients. Poirot admits to being ignorant of the legend of Hercules. The talk turns to Poirot's intention to retire after completing a few cases of interest and personal appeal and Burton laughingly refers to the twelve labours of Hercules. This comment gives Poirot pause for thought and after his visitor has gone, Poirot gets acquainted with the exploits of his legendary namesake, deciding his final cases will mimic Hercules' Twelve Labours.
="The Nemean Lion"=Miss Lemon finds the first of the labours in a letter from a bluff outspoken Northern businessman, Sir Joseph Hoggin, whose wife's
Pekingese dog has been kidnapped. Poirot meets Hoggin who tells him the dog was taken a week ago but returned for a ransom of two hundred pounds. Hoggin would have left the matter there but for the fact that the same thing had happened to an acquaintance at his club. Poirot meets the petulant Lady Hoggin and her put-upon companion, Miss Amy Carnaby, who is clearly frightened of her employer. Miss Carnaby took the yapping dog, Shan-Tung (described by Poirot as "a veritable lion"), for his walk in the park and she stopped to admire a baby in the pram. When she looked down, someone had cut the dog's lead and it had been taken. A ransom note said to leave the money in notes in an envelope for a Captain Curtis at an address in Bloomsbury.
Poirot begins his investigations. Having ascertained the name of Miss Carnaby's previous employer, Lady Hartingfield who died a year before, he visits her niece who confirms Lady Hoggin's view of Miss Carnaby's lack of intellect but essential good qualities, looking after an invalid sister and being good with dogs, so much so that Lady Hartingfield left her Pekingese to her. Poirot interviews the park keeper who remembers the incident of the kidnap. He then investigates the address where the ransom money was sent to and finds that it is a cheap hotel where letters are often left for non-residents. His third visit is to the wife of the man Hoggin met at his club who gives a very similar story to that told by Lady Hoggin as to the method of kidnap and ransom demand. His last visit is back to Sir Joseph to report on progress where he observes that Sir Joseph's relationship with his blond secretary is not exactly on a professional level...
Poirot sends Georges, his valet, out investigating and finds an address which conforms in every way to Poirot's suspicions of where it would be and what he would find there. Poirot visits it and finds Miss Carnaby, her invalid sister, Emily and their Pekingese dog, Augustus. They are part of ascam run by women who are companions to rich and ungrateful ladies who are poorly paid, without talent and will be cast adrift when they get older. The dog that is taken out for a walk is their own, Augustus, who is let off his lead and is able to find his way back to the sister's flat unaided, thus providing witnesses to the 'crime'. The 'subject' of the kidnap is held at the sister's flat and their owner told of the ransom. Quite often it is the companion who is sent out with the envelope of pound notes which goes into a general pool for all the companions involved in the scheme. Miss Carnaby feels guilty for her crime but excuses it on the basis of the way they are treated by their employers – only the other day Lady Hoggin accused her of tampering with her tonic as it tasted unpleasant. Poirot tells them their activities must stop and that the money must be returned to Lady Hoggin although he is sure that he will be able to persuade her husband not to involve the police.
Poirot meets Sir Joseph and offers two alternatives: prosecute the criminal (who he doesn't name) in which case he will lose his money, or just take the money and call the case closed. The greedy Sir Joseph agrees to the latter option and takes Poirot's cheque. The detective turns the conversation round to murder cases and tells a rattled Sir Joseph that he reminds him of a Belgian murderer who poisoned his wife in order to marry his secretary. Poirot's meaning is quite clear and the shaken man gives Poirot his cheque back, telling him to keep the money. Poirot sends it back to the Misses Carnaby's telling them that it is the final contribution to their fund before it is wound up. Meanwhile, Lady Hoggin tells her relieved husband that her tonic no longer tastes so bitter…Poirot is asked for help by Doctor Charles Oldfield who has a practice in Market Loughborough, a small village in
Berkshire . His wife died just over a year ago and the malicious talk in the village is that he poisoned her. People are avoiding him and several poison pen letters have been sent to him but he can do nothing to stem this tide of ill-intentioned gossip – like the heads of the Hydra, when one source of the gossip is cut off, another grows in its place. Mrs Oldfield was a difficult invalid whose death was put down to a gastric ulcer, whose symptoms are similar to that ofarsenic poisoning. She left her husband a not-considerable sum of money and, under pressure, Oldfield admits that a lot of the talk revolves around Jean Moncrieffe, his young dispenser, who he wants to marry but dare not because of the talk. Poirot travels to Market Loughborough and meets Jean. She is frank about her relationship with Oldfield and her dislike of his wife but opposes Poirot's idea of anexhumation andautopsy on the body. Poirot makes the rounds of the village, insinuating that he is connected with theHome Office and thereby generating much hypocritical murmurs of sympathy for the doctor and, more importantly, names of who said what and when. From this he learns of the present whereabouts of two servants of the Oldfields who left their employ after Mrs Oldfield died; Nurse Harrison, who tended to the patient, and Beatrice, the family maid. Nurse Harrison tells a story of overhearing Jean and the Doctor talking about the imminent death of his wife in which it was clear that this was an event that both of them were impatiently waiting for. The nurse is certain that Beatrice must have overheard the talk as well. Poirot tells her of the supposed plans of exhumation and the nurse considers this news and then tells him she agrees that such a thing should be done. When interviewing Beatrice, the sly maid denies overhearing any conversation but tells him of several suspicious stories of Jean making medicines or pots of tea for Mrs Oldfield which the nurse poured away or changed before the patient could take them.
Poirot does indeed get permission for an exhumation and the body is proved to be riddled with arsenic. Nurse Harrison is shocked and tells Poirot a new story of seeing Jean filling up a make-up compact with a powder from the dispensary. Poirot alerts the police who find such a compact in the bureau of the bedroom of Jean's lodgings. They show it to Nurse Harrison who excitedly confirms that is the one she saw…only for Poirot to tell her that such compacts have only been manufactured for three months and that he had his valet, Georges, follow her some days previously, buy the compact at Woolworths and then go to Jean's lodgings and secrete it there. Trapped and broken, Nurse Harrison admits the murder.
Poirot speaks with Jean and tells her that the conversation Nurse Harrison claimed to have overheard seemed psychologically unlikely as two possible conspirators would never had had such a conversation in a place where they could be easily listened to. He observed the nurse's positive reaction when he told her of a possible exhumation and then had her followed by Georges who witnessed the buying of the compact and the laying of the trap for Jean. The motive was jealousy as Nurse Harrison was convinced by Oldfield's kind manner over several years that he intended her to be his bride.Poirot is diverted to stay in an English village inn when his
chauffeur -driven car breaks down. Although he doesn't appreciate the badly cooked meal he is served, he does enjoy relaxing in front of the fire in his room after his walk through the snow to reach the establishment. He is interrupted by themechanic who is trying to repair the car. The young man – Ted Williamson – is impossibly handsome, like aGreek god , and Poirot is reminded of a shepherd in Arcady. Williamson knows of Poirot's reputation and asks him to trace a young girl who has disappeared. The previous June, Williamson was called out to a large house nearby called 'Grasslawn' to repair a broken radio. The house owners and their guests were out boating and he was shown in by the maid to a Russianballet dancer who was staying there. The golden-haired maid was called Nita and Williamson fell for her. He went out for a walk with her and she said she would be back with her mistress in two weeks time and would see him again but when the time had came for their second meeting, the maid was different. The new maid, Marie Hellin, gave him an address in North London to write to contact Nita - but his letter came back unanswered. Poirot visits this address and was told the girl, an Italian, had returned to her home country. She is described by the landlady as dark-haired and bad-tempered, whereas the girl Williamson described was golden-haired. Poirot tries to trace Nita through her former employer, Katrina Samoushenka, but is told that the dancer has gone to Paris. He also speaks with the owner of 'Grasslawn', Sir George Sanderfield, who remembers Marie – with some unease - but doesn't recall a maid on the first occasion of Madame Samoushenka's visit to his house, and thinks Poirot is mistaken. Marie is the subject of Poirot's next visit. She was employed in the last week of June when the previous maid had left, possibly due to illness. She hints that she knows something of Sir George that Poirot would like to know, but the detective doesn't take up the offer, much to her annoyance.
Poirot speaks to his contact in the theatre world who tells him the dancer has now gone to Vagray Les Alpes inSwitzerland as she hasTuberculosis , and that her maid was an Italian fromPisa . Poirot travels to Pisa to find from her family that Nita Valetta – who they refer to as Bianca - hadappendicitis and died on the operating table. Poirot has seemingly reached the end of his quest, but something troubles him and he moves on to Switzerland where he finds the dying Katrina Samoushenka. She confirms Poirot's suspicions that Marie Hellin was blackmailing Sir George Sanderfield and that Marie's predecessor, Nita, has died. However Poirot points out that Nita's family called her 'Bianca'. He notices Katrina's golden hair and puts it to her that on the visit to Sanderfield's house in June, she was between maids – Bianca had left and Marie had not yet been employed. Katrina Samoushenka was, in fact, 'Nita' or 'Incognita' to give her a full name, and she had enjoyed several hours of pleasure in Arcady with her Greek god when he called at the house and the others were out. She does not deny his story. His quest for the Arcadian deer is at an end.Poirot is still in Switzerland after solving the third labour of Hercules. Sightseeing, he takes a
funicular to the mountain-top hotel of Rochers Neiges. On the way up, his ticket is checked by a conductor who also passes him a hurriedly-scribbled note which is apparently from Lementeuil, the Swiss Commissaire of Police. It tells Poirot that he has been recognized because of his moustaches and asks for his help. Marrascaud, a Parisian gangster has fled from his homeland after the killing of Salley, abookmaker and is believed from information received to be having a rendezvous with members of his gang at Rochers Neiges. Poirot considers the note; Marrascaud has been the prime suspect in many killings but this is the first time that his guilt in the crime is beyond doubt. Although annoyed that his holiday is being delayed, it is the phrase used by Lementeuil to describe Marrascaud – "a wild boar" – that catches his interest, seeing in this the fourth of his self-imposed labours.
He observes his fellow passengers on the funicular. There is a friendly American tourist called Mr Schwartz, a beautiful but melancholy woman, a distinguished-looking man wearing a pince-nez reading a book in German and three criminal types playing cards. Arriving at the hotel, they find it somewhat in chaos as they are only just opening at the start of the season. To Poirot, the manager seems in too much of a nervous panic whereas the only efficient person is Gustav, the waiter. Talking to the manager and then Schwartz again, Poirot is told that the beautiful woman comes each year on the anniversary of her husband's death in the area, the distinguished man is Dr Lutz, a Jewish refugee from the Nazis inVienna . Poirot introduces himself as Monsieur Poirier, a silk merchant fromLyon .
The next morning, when delivering his morning coffee to his room, Gustav tells Poirot that in fact he is M. Drouet, a police inspector. They are now cut off in the hotel as the funicular has been damaged during the night, undoubtedly by sabotage. They discuss who Marrascaud could be amongst the hotel guests and staff who also include Jacques, the husband of the cook. Poirot is most interested as to why a rendezvous has been arranged in such an isolated place. The two agree to work together.
Poirot speaks with Jacques and his wife and discovers that before 'Gustav' there was another waiter called Robert who was dismissed for incompetence but no one seems to have witnessed his leaving the hotel. That night, the three card-playing men attack Poirot in his room but he is saved by a pistol-carrying Schwartz. The three men are locked up and Scwartz tells Poirot that the men have already 'carved up' Gustav's face. They find Dr. Lutz attending the injured detective who is no danger of his life and follow a dusty trail down the carpets of the hotel to an unused wing where there find a dead body – that of Robert, the 'dismissed' waiter. Poirot uses aheliograph to signal down the mountain for help and three days later, Lementeuil and some officers arrive after climbing up to the hotel. It is then that Poirot announces that Gustav is not Drouet but is in reality Marrascaud. Robert was a police officer and Marrascaud killed him and took his place. The first night in the hotel, Poirot did not drink his coffee which he suspected was drugged and witnessed 'Gustav' entering his room and rifling his pockets, finding the note from Lementeuil. The three card players were members of Marrascaud's gang but they did not attack their leader - the carve-up of his face was carried out by Dr. Lutz who is a plastic surgeon and that is the real reason why the rendezvous took place in such an isolated spot."The Augean Stables"
Poirot is asked to help the Prime Minister, Edward Ferrier, who predecessor in the role was his father-in-law John Hammett, now Lord Cornworthy. He was held up as an exemplary
role model as to what an honest and honourable politician should be. However beneath the surface he was involved in chicanery, dishonest share dealing and misusing party funds. These revelations have come as a shock to his son-in-law who forced Hammett to resign on the grounds on ill-health and then took up the post himself. The revelations are about to be revealed to the public by a scandal sheet of a newspaper called "The X-ray news" when Ferrier is attempting to clean up public life. Poirot is uninterested until theHome Secretary , Sir George Conway, uses the phrase "The Augean Stables" at which point he agrees to assist. Poirot visits Percy Perry, the seedy editor of "The X-ray news" who he has heard has previously accepted sums of money for not printing stories, in other words,blackmail . On this occasion, Perry refuses to accept money and says he will publish. Soon afterwards, along with the stories about Hammett, another series of news reports start to appear in the press which hint at various sex scandals regarding Ferrier's wife, Dagmar. They paint a picture of her as wanton and cavorting at clubs with a South American gigolo. These stories appear in "The X-ray news" which is sued for libel by Mrs Ferrier. The prosecution provides their first witness – theBishop of Northumbria – who swears that Mrs Ferrier was at his palace recovering on doctor's orders on the dates mentioned by the newspaper. The second witness is a lady called Thelma Anderson who states that she was approached by a man who said he worked for the "The X-ray news" and employed her to impersonate Mrs Ferrier. She was then photographed in various compromising situations. Mrs Ferrier wins her libel case easily and in doing so also makes the public assume that the rumours about Hammett were also fabricated. Poirot reveals to an astonished Ferrier that the idea to use Thelma Anderson was his and that Dagmar was in on the plan. The idea came from Dumas' book "The Queen's Necklace" but the real inspiration was "The Augean Stables" when Hercules uses a force of nature – in his case a river – to clean the stables out. Poirot used sex as the force of nature, first blackening Mrs Ferrier's name and then clearing her in a public fashion, resulting in a wave of sympathy which also reflected well on her father and destroyed "The X-ray news" and their influence."The Stymphalean Birds"
Harold Waring, an under-secretary of state at the age of only thirty, is enjoying a holiday in the country of Herzoslovakia at a hotel by the side of Lake Stempka. The only other English people there are an elderly woman, Mrs Rice, and her married daughter, Mrs Elsie Clayton. Two other women cause Harold a moment of disquiet. He first sees them as they come up a path from the lake to the hotel. They are dressed in black-flapping cloaks, have hooked noses and bring to Harold's mind an image of evil birds of prey. Chatting to Mrs Rice, Harold finds out that her daughter is not widowed, as he supposed, but is in an abusive marriage. Her husband, Philip, drinks, is insanely jealous and has a vicious temper. Her daughter's character is slowly being destroyed by this relationship. Mrs Rice has also found out from the hotel concierge that the two evil looking women as Polish sisters.
One morning, Harold finds Elsie sat on a log in the woods, crying about the state of her life. He comforts her and escorting her back to the hotel, they come across one of the Polish women. He wonders how much she saw...
That evening, Elsie bursts into Harold's room. Her husband has arrived at the hotel unexpectedly and is in a terrible rage. At that moment, Philip Clayton runs in. He is carrying a spanner and screams at Elsie, accusing her of having an affair just as one of the Polish women had told him. He chases Elsie out of Harold's room and back to her own one. Harold runs after him and is in time to see Elsie throw a paperweight at her husband in self-defence. He falls to the ground and Elsie begs Harold to leave them before he gets himself into trouble. Half an hour later, Mrs Rice joins Harold and tells him that Philip is dead, killed by the blow.
Harold is aghast, worried if the foreign police will believe the story both he and Elsie have to tell and that their 'relationship' is innocent. The evidence points tomanslaughter at best and murder at worst. Mrs Rice suddenly has an idea and wonders if the hotel management and foreign police are open tobribery . Harold agrees to give it a try and wires for money but aside from that, and unable to speak the local language, leaves Mrs Rice to carry out the negotiations. All seems to go well and the next day Harold sees Mrs Rice speaking with a police officer and she tells him that the death has been declared as being from natural causes and that they are all in the clear. That is until the two Polish women approach Mrs Rice and speak to her. She translates for Harold and tells him that they know what really happened (their room being next to Elsie's) and that they are blackmailing the English people. In a fever of concern, Harold is walking by the lake when he encounters Poirot. Desperate, he confesses to the strange little man what has happened. Poirot sees an immediate link between the two Polish women and the Stymphalean Birds. Poirot promises to help and the next day he tells Harold that he has been successful and that his blackmailers have been dealt with. He found out by telegram that they were wanted by the police and that they have been arrested. Harold is relieved but suddenly spots the two Polish women and wonders what is going on. Poirot tells him that they are of good family and that the true blackmailers were Mrs Rice and her daughter. 'Philip Clayton' has never existed and the man Harold saw 'killed' was Mrs Rice in disguise. No foreign police are open to bribery in the way that Harold was told. He provided all the money and was innocent of what Mrs Rice 'negotiated' as he didn't speak the language. Harold resolves to learn every European language from now onwards.
="The Cretan Bull"=Poirot is asked for assistance by a young lady, Diana Maberly. She was engaged to marry Hugh Chandler for over a year but he has broken it off as he thinks he is going mad. There is a history of insanity in the family, with his grandfather and a great aunt being afflicted, and his father, Admiral Chandler, has insisted that his son leave the navy before his condition gets worse but the reason was hidden under the pretext of having to manage the family country estate – a reason no one believed, including Colonel Frobisher, a great family friend and Hugh's godfather. At Poirot's prompting, Diana admits that there have been some unusual occurrences on nearby farms with the throats of sheep cut and the like but insists it has nothing to do with the situation. The Admiral refuses to let a doctor see his son.
Poirot travels with Diana to the family seat of Lyde Manor where the meets the people involved. Hugh strikes Poirot as a fine young bull of a man. He learns further details of the history of insanity in the family from Colonel Frobisher, including Hugh's grandfather being so bad that he had to be committed to an asylum. Poirot also hears that Hugh's mother died when he was ten years old in a boating accident when she was out with the Admiral and that she was previously engaged to Frobisher before he went off to India with the British Army but when he came home he found that she had married Admiral Chandler, however this incident did nothing to lessen the ties of friendship between the two men. Poirot forces Frobisher to tell him more details of the incident with the sheep and finds out that on the night concerned, the Admiral found his son in bed with blood on his clothes and blood in the washbasin but Hugh remembered nothing of what he had done. Poirot also questions the Admiral who has aged immensely since these incidents started and who feels that breaking the engagement is best for everyone and that there will be no more Chandlers at Lyde Manor after he and his son have died.
In questioning Hugh, Poirot hears of his dreams which always seem to include elements of hydrophobia. He also suffers fromhallucinations and has one while speaking to Poirot of seeing a skeletal figure in the garden. Poirot however is convinced that Hugh is sane and begins his investigations, asking Diana to arrange for him to spend the night in the manor. He searches Hugh's room and also makes a trip to a local chemist, supposedly to pick up a toothbrush...
That night, Hugh somehow manages to get out of his locked room and is found outside Diana's room, a bloodied knife in his hands from having killed a cat. Hugh recovers consciousness and tells the others he intends to go out shooting rabbits. It is clear that his real intention is to commit suicide in the woods with a shotgun and therefore save himself and the others further pain. Poirot stops him and tells them all that Hugh is being set up to carry out the very act of suicide. He is being poisoned withDatura . Thealkaloid produces hallucinations and causes great thirst. It is being given to Hugh as part of his shaving cream and thereby continually entering his system with each day's application. Poirot took a sample to the chemist for testing. As to who is responsible…Poirot reveals that Admiral Chandler has inherited the insanity of his family but that Hugh is not his son. Hugh is the natural son of Colonel Frobisher who had an affair with his mother before he went to India. The Admiral recognised the resemblance in his son to his friend and learned the truth from his wife before he murdered her in the boating "accident". He further blocked Hugh from seeing a doctor who would have confirmed his sanity. The Admiral takes the shotgun and repeats his son's excuse that he is going outside rabbit shooting. The last of the Chandlers commits suicide…One night, Poirot is telephoned for help by a young medical acquaintance, Doctor Michael Stoddart. Going to the
mews address given to him, Poirot finds Stoddart in one of the flat where a party had been taking place before the medical man got there. The flat is owned by a lady called Patience Grace and the party involved a high use ofcocaine . Mrs. Grace had an argument with her boyfriend, Anthony Hawker, and she attempted to shoot him as he left the flat. She ended up inflicting a flesh wound on a tramp that was passing by and has now been happily paid off. Michael's concern is for a beautiful young girl called Sheila Grant who he met at a hunt ball in the country. She is one of four daughters of a retired army general and there is every sign that Sheila and her three sisters are starting to go wild, getting into a bad set where the cocaine flows freely. Sheila was at the party, is still at the flat having just woken up and is feeling terrible after the high of the drugs. Michael lectures her about the cocaine and Poirot introduces himself. It is obvious that Shelia has heard of him and is nervous of him.
Poirot visits the county of Mertonshire where an old friend, Lady Carmichael, gives him details of the Grant family. All the girls are going to the bad as their father cannot control them. Anthony Hawker has an unpleasant reputation as does another of his 'lady friends', Mrs. Larkin. Lady Carmichael is thrilled to think that Poirot has visited to investigation some special crime but the detective tells her he is simply there to tame four wild horses...
He visits General Grant whose house is filled with artifacts of India. The General himself completes the clichéd picture, sat in an armchair with his foot bandaged up againstgout through drinking port and railing against the world. Poirot breaks the news of the drugs and listens to the cries of anger and sworn threats of the old man against however is getting his girls into trouble. Leaving the room, Poirot clumsily trips against his host.Poirot manages to get himself invited to a party at Mrs. Larkin's where he meets Pamela Grant, Sheila's sister. Hawker arrives with Sheila in tow, having just come from a hunt, wanting to fill up Hawker's drinks flask. Sheila has heard from one of the house servants that Poirot visited her father the day before. He tells her of the threat she is under from her drug taking and turns to leave, as he goes hearing Pam whispering to Sheila about the flask. In the hall of Mrs. Larkin's house Poirot sees the abandoned drinks flask and finds it full of white powder.
Some time later, back at Lady Carmichael's Poirot tells Sheila that her photograph has been recognised. She is Sheila Kelly and she and the other three women under General Grant's roof are not sisters. Nor is Grant an army general. He is the head of the drugs ring and the four young women push the drugs for him. He persuades her to give evidence against the man and thereby smash the ring. He tells an astonished Michael that the 'General's' act overdid the cliché as gout is usually suffered by old men, not middle-aged men of teenage girls. His trip was a test which Grant failed as he didn't react with pain when Poirot stumbled into him. Hawker was not a pusher of drugs but a receiver and Pam and Sheila were trying to set him up when they put the flask of cocaine in the hall of Mrs. Larkin's house. Poirot tells an embarrassed Michael that Sheila is certain to lose her criminal tendencies with him to look after her…"The Girdle of Hyppolita"
Alexander Simpson asks Poirot to help in the investigation of a painting by Rubens which was stolen from the gallery that he owns. A group of unemployed men were paid to carry out a demonstration in the gallery which, once it was cleared by the police, was found to have been a diversion to enable the picture to be cut out of its frame. Simpson knows the picture is being transported to France where it will be bought by a millionaire collector and he wants Poirot to assist as he thinks he will be better at dealing with an unscrupulous rich man than the police will be. Poirot reluctantly agrees to help.
He is far more interested in a case that Japp has about a fifteen-year old English girl who was being escorted to Paris as one of a party of such girls for the new term at Miss Pope's exclusive school there. On the way back from the dining car of the train, just after it leftAmiens (the last stop before Paris), Winnie King went into the toilet and hasn't been seen again. No body has been found by the side of the tracks and the train didn't stop once, merely slowed down for a signal. Poirot is interested if the plain-looking girl's shoes have been found...
Some time later, Japp phones Poirot and tells him Winnie has been found about fifteen miles from Amiens. She is in a daze, has been doped according to the doctor who examined her and is unable to remember much after setting off from her home town of Cranchester. She remembers nothing of meeting one of Miss Pope's staff, Miss Burshaw, in London over the trip over the channel. Despite the girl being found, Poirot speaks with Detective Inspector Hearn who has been dealing with the case and is no nearer to solving the mystery of how the girl disappeared. The only other people in the carriage seemed clear of suspicion – two middle-aged spinsters, two French commercial travellers from Lyon, a young man called James Elliot and his flashy wife and an American lady who nothing much is known about. He is able to confirm that Winnie's shoes were found by the rail line which confirms Poirot's theory...
Poirot goes to Frances and visits Miss Pope's establishment at Neuilly. The formidable headmistress tells Poirot of the advantages of her school being close to the music and culture of Paris. He hears how two sets of Parisian police asked to search through Winnie's trunks, neither seemingly having spoken to the other, and shows him a badly painted picture in oils that Winnie executed for Miss Pope as a present of the bridge at Cranchester. In front of the startled woman, Poirot begins to rub at the picture with turpentine whilst telling her that Winnie never made the trip across to France. Miss Burshaw met a girl in London who she had never seen before and who then totally changed her appearance in the toilet on the train, discarding the shoes which were obviously those of a schoolgirl's through the window and transforming herself into the flashy wife of James Elliot, just as he has changed the dreadful oil painting of "Winnie's" into the Girdle of Hyppolita by Rubens. The thieves used the trick of smuggling the painting in an escorted schoolgirl's trunk knowing such a thing would never be searched by customs and one of the gang then threw off her disguise of a plain schoolgirl, knowing the trunk would reach the school and they could then retrieve them as part of the investigation. They were not to know that Miss Pope insists on trunks being unpacked upon arrival and had already taken possession of the picture.When Poirot leaves, the girls swarm around him asking for his autograph which Poirot refers to as the attack by theAmazons .Poirot is reacquainted with Miss Carnaby, the companion from the episode of the Nemean Lion, who Poirot praises as one of the most successful criminals he ever met. She is worried as she constantly thinks of illegal schemes which she is sure would work and she fears she is turning into a hardened criminal. She wants to put her talents to good use and assist Poirot in fighting crime in any way she can. She also has brought to him a possible case in which she can prove herself. She has a friend, Mrs. Emmeline Clegg, who is a widow who is comfortably off and who in her loneliness has found comfort in a religious
sect called "The Flock of the Shepherd" who are based in a retreat inDevon . Their leader is a handsome charismatic man called Dr. Andersen and Mrs. Clegg has found herself so caught up in the sect that she has left them all of her property in a will. Miss Carnaby is especially concerned as she knows of three women in a similar situation who have all died within the past year. She has investigated and found nothing unusual in the deaths, all of which were due to natural causes and none of them happened within the sanctuary but at the deceased's homes. Poirot asks Miss Carnaby to infiltrate the sect. She is to pretend to be dismissive of them and then, once within the sanctuary, be persuaded to be a convert.
Poirot consults Japp about the investigation. The Scotland Yard detective finds out that Andersen is a German chemist, expelled from a university there by the Nazis because he had a Jewish mother and that there is nothing suspicious about the deaths of the women whose names have been supplied by Miss Carnaby. Nevertheless Poirot views Andersen as the monsterGeryon who he is determined to destroy.
Miss Carnaby settles down at the sanctuary with Mrs Clegg and joins in a festival held at night – "The Full Growth of the Pasture". At the service, she is dismissive of theliturgy but suddenly feels a needle-prick in her arm. Almost instantly she starts to experience a feeling of well-being andeuphoria which makes her sleep for a short while.
Soon afterwards she and Poirot consult and he checks that she has followed the remainder of her instructions: they are to tell Andersen that she is going to come into a large sum of money that she will leave to the sect, that she has problems with her lungs and that Mrs. Clegg will soon inherit an even larger sum of money from an aunt than that which her late husband left her. Poirot also asks if she has met a Mr Cole at the sanctuary. Miss Carnaby has and to her he is a very strange man. As if to prove her assertion correct, soon afterwards Mr Cole accosts Miss Carnaby with tales of his strange visions which involve sacrifices,Jehovah and evenOdin . She is saved from further strange tales by the arrival of Mr Lipscombe, the lodge keeper of the Devonshire estate.
The day before the next divine service, Miss Carnaby meets Poirot in a local teashop. She seems to have had an about-face and tells Poirot that Andersen is a great man and that cannot betray him. She rushes out of the shop and Poirot sees that a surly-looking man has been listening into their conversation...
The next service is proceeding and Miss Carnaby is about to be injected again when Mr Cole steps in. There is a fight and the police pour into the room. Mr Cole is in fact Detective Inspector Cole and he arrests Andersen.
Later all the parties concerned confer. The man in the teashop was Mr Lipscombe and when Miss Carnaby recognised him, she put on an act of allegiance to Andersen. Poirot realised this when he had the man followed back to the lodge. Andersen's chemistry background (although he was probably not a Jewish refugee) came in useful for preparing ahashish injection for his adherents and also for injecting them with relevant bacteria when he wanted to kill them in order to inherit the contents of their wills from them. The syringe that Andersen was about to inject Miss Carnaby with contained atuberculosis virus to tie in with the fictional ailment she told him about. The proof has been obtained in the laboratory in the sanctuary that the police have raided.Poirot receives a visit from Emery Power, a rich art collector. Ten years ago he purchased at auction a gold goblet which was supposedly made for Alexander VI by
Benvenuto Cellini which the Borgia Pope used to poison his victims. The design of the goblet is a tree with a coiled serpent and the apples on the tree are represented by emeralds. Poirot is immediately interested at the mention of apples. Power paid a sum equal to thirty thousand pounds at the auction in 1929 but on the night of the sale the goblet and other items were stolen from the home of the seller, the Marchese di San Veratrino. The police at the time were certain that a gang of three international thieves were responsible. Two of the men were captured and some of the stolen items recovered but the goblet was not among them. A third man, an Irish cat burglar called Patrick Casey died soon afterwards when he fell from a building while committing his latest crime. Power has spent ten years and a lot of money trying to locate the goblet but without success. The Marchese has offered to refund his money but Power does not want to take advantage of this offer as he would no longer be the legal owner of the goblet should it be found. He suspected that the real criminal was Sir Reuben Rosenthal who was his rival bidder at the auction in 1929 but they recently become business allies and Power is now convinced Rosenthal is innocent.
Poirot takes up the commission and interviews the detective on the case – Inspector Wagstaffe- about the suspects. Casey's wife, a strict catholic, is dead. His daughter is a nun in aconvent and his son, who took after his father, is in jail in America. There are many leads connected with the gang which stretch all over the world and Poirot sets his inquiries in motion...
Three months later he finds himself in a remote part of the western coast ofIreland . He visits the convent where Casey's daughter became a nun but finds that she died two months before. Poirot makes the acquaintance of one of the locals who helps him break into the convent – where he recovers the goblet. He returns it to Power and tells him that the nuns were using it as achalice . Casey's daughter probably took it there to atone for her father's sins and the nuns were ignorant of its ownership and ancient history. Poirot deduced it would be at the convent as there had been no trace of anyone having the goblet after it was stolen therefore it was somewhere where "ordinary material values did not apply". The mention of Casey's daughter being a nun supplied the obvious place. Poirot shows Power how the renaissance Pope used a hidden mechanism in the goblet to put the poison in the victim's drink and suggests that no good will come out of owning an object with such an evil history. If it was given back to the convent, the nuns will say masses for Power's soul. The art collector realises that his rapaciousness has made him unhappy and agrees to the suggestion.Poirot is leaving the
London Underground at Piccadilly Circus when he passes an old acquaintance, the Countess Vera Rossakoff, on the escalators, going in the opposite direction. She insists that they meet and when asked to suggest a place, responds "InHell …"! Poirot is puzzled but it is the unflappable Miss Lemon who coolly informs him it is the name of a new Londonnightclub and books him a table for that night. The club is in a basement and is decorated in styles of hell as represented by different cultures. It even has a large black, vicious-looking hound at the entrance calledCerberus . Rossakoff introduces him to Professor Liskeard who advised her on the decorations (although he is ashamed of the gaudy results), and to Dr Alice Cunningham, a practitioner ofpsychology who is engaged to Rossakoff's son, currently working in America. Alice and Poirot do not get along. She is coldly interested in criminal tendencies and finds Rossakoff's kleptomania interesting, but to Poirot's chagrin, she does not seem at all interested in the legendary detective! His questioning of her manner of dress with her heavy coat and pocketed skirt instead of a more feminine style of clothing does not go down well. However, Alice does find an individual called Paul Varesco fascinating. He is a good-lookingLounge Lizard with a very dubious reputation and she spends time dancing with him, questioning him incessantly about incidents in his childhood which could have contributed to his personality. Poirot recognises a young Scotland Yard detective in the crowd in evening dress and feels that something is going on...
Seeing Japp the next day, Poirot's suspicions are confirmed. The club is being watched by the police as they have linked it to a dope ring. They cannot trace the person who put up the money to buy the club but they do know the dope is being paid for by jewellery. Rich ladies swap their stones for paste imitations and drugs, later denying they knew of the substitution when they contact the police and their insurance companies. Scotland Yard have traced the work done on the jewels to a company called Golconda, and from there to Paul Varesco. Under the guise of picking up a wanted murderer, the police raided the club but were unable to find any jewels or dope secreted in the club or on anyone there, particularly Varesco.
Poirot questions Rossakoff about the true owner of the club. She denies that anyone else is the owner, but she is horrified to be told of its dope connection. Japp tells Poirot of another plan to raid the club and Poirot makes his own arrangements. On the night of the raid, Poirot stations a small man called Higgs outside the club.
The morning after the raid, Japp phones Poirot to tell him they found jewels in the pocket of Professor Liskeard but he has been set up. However no dope was discovered so someone must have remove it from the club. Poirot tells the astonished Japp that he was responsible, and then puts the phone down.
Rossakoff arrives at Poirot's flat. She happily confesses to Poirot that she put the jewels in the professor's pocket as she had found them in her own bag when the raid started, and so she had to get rid of them as quickly as she could. It was Varesco who planted them on her and she admits that he is the true owner of the premises. Poirot takes her into the next room where Higgs and Cerberus are waiting. Higgs is able to handle any dog and took the otherwise fierce animal out during the raid. Poirot asks Rossakoff to order the obedient dog to drop what it is holding in its mouth and it does so. A small sealed packet of cocaine drops to the ground. A shocked Rossakoff loudly proclaims her innocence and Poirot says he believes her – the true criminal is Alice who is in league with Verasco. She carried the drugs in her large skirt pockets and dropped them into her clients' pockets on the dance floor. When the raid occurred and the lights went out temporarily, Poirot was waiting by Cerberus and heard her put the packet in the dog's mouth – and Poirot took the opportunity to cut off a sample of cloth from her sleeve as proof.Literary significance and reception
No review of this book appeared in the "
Times Literary Supplement ".Maurice Richardson, in the October 5, 1947 issue of "
The Observer " wrote briefly, "the Queen of Crime tries the difficult, unrewarding sprint form. "The Labours of Hercules" consists of twelve Poirot cases, neatly constructed but inevitably lacking the criss-cross of red-herring trails that make our arteries pulse over the full distance. But will Agatha Christie allow the little egg-headed egomaniac to carry out his frightful threat of retirement?" ["The Observer" October 5, 1947 (Page 3)]An unnamed reviewer in the "Toronto Daily Star" of December 6, 1947 said, "Hercule Poirot...here emulates his Olympian namesake, Hercules...As the old-timer tackled the 12 classical labors...so Mrs. Christie turns her dapper sleuth loose on 12 modern counterparts in the detection-mystery line. A tricky task, neatly done." ["Toronto Daily Star" December 6, 1947 (Page 14)]
Robert Barnard : "Probably the best single short-story collection, because more varied in its problems and lighter in its touch than usual. Lots of tricks from her novels, and other people's used very skilfully. But the mention of the goblet made by Cellini for Alexander VI (before the age of three?) is a good example of Christie slapdash, almost amounting to philistinism or contempt for her audience." [Barnard, Robert. "A Talent to Deceive – an appreciation of Agatha Christie" - Revised edition (Page 195-6). Fontana Books, 1990. ISBN 0006374743]References to actual history, geography and current science
In "The Capture of Cerberus" Professor Liskeard speaks of the "Criminal
Code of Hammurabi " and correctly dates it to 1800BC , however he goes on to speak of older Sumerian laws quoting, "If a wife hateth her husband and saith unto him, 'Thou art not my husband' they shall throw her into the river." However Sumerian Laws were part of the Code of Hammurabi.Publication history
* 1947, Dodd Mead and Company (New York), 1947, Hardback, 265 pp
* 1947, Collins Crime Club (London), September 1947, Hardback, 256 pp
* 1951,Dell Books , Paperback, 255 pp
* 1953,Penguin Books , Paperback, (Penguin number 928), 254 pp
* 1961, Fontana Books (Imprint ofHarperCollins ), Paperback, 256 pp
* 1967, Greenway edition of collected works (William Collins), Hardcover, 319 pp
* 1967, Greenway edition of collected works (Dodd Mead), Hardcover, 319 pp
* 1978, UlverscroftLarge-print Edition, Hardcover, 467 pp ISBN 0-70-890119-0First publication of stories
All of the stories except for "The Capture of Cerberus" were first published in the UK in the "
Strand Magazine " with illustrations by Ernest Ratcliff as follows:* "The Nemean Lion": November 1939 - Issue 587
* "The Lernaean Hydra": December 1939 - Issue 588
* "The Arcadian Deer": January 1940 - Issue 589
* "The Erymanthian Boar": February 1940 - Issue 590
* "The Augean Stables": March 1940 - Issue 591
* "The Stymphalean Birds": April 1940 - Issue 592
* "The Cretan Bull": May 1940 - Issue 593
* "The Horses of Diomedes": June 1940 - Issue 594
* "The Girdle of Hyppolita": July 1940 - Issue 595
* "The Flock of Geryon": August 1940 - Issue 596
* "The Apples of the Hesperides": September 1940 - 597"The Capture of Cerberus" received its first UK publication in the Collins first edition.
In the US nine of the stories were first published in the weekly newspaper supplement "This Week" magazine in two series of four stories each plus one later publication as follows:
* "The Lernaean Hydra": September 3, 1939 under the title "Invisible Enemy"
* "The Girdle of Hyppolita": September 10, 1939 under the title "The Disappearance of Winnie King"
* "The Stymphalean Birds": September 17, 1939 under the title "The Vulture Women" with an illustration by C.C. Beall
* "The Cretan Bull": September 24, 1939 under the title "Midnight Madness"
* "The Erymanthian Boar": May 5, 1940 under the title "Murder Mountain"
* "The Apples of the Hesperides": May 12, 1940 under the title "The Poison Cup"
* "The Arcadian Deer": May 19, 1940 under the title "Vanishing Lady" with an illustration by C.C. Beall
* "The Flock of Geryon": May 26, 1940 under the title "Weird Monster"
* "The Capture of Cerberus": March 16, 1947 under the title "Meet Me in Hell"In addition, two other stories were first published in the US unillustrated in "Ellery Queen's Mystery Magazine" as follows:
* "The Nemean Lion": September 1944 (Volume 5, Number 18) under the title "The Case of the Kidnaped Pekinese"
* "The Horses of Diomedes": January 1945 (Volume 6, Number 20) under the title "The Case of the Drug Peddler"References
External links
* [http://us.agathachristie.com/site/find_a_story/stories/The_Labours_of_Hercules.php "The Labours of Hercules"] at the official Agatha Christie website
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.