- Jan Swammerdam
Jan Swammerdam (
February 12 ,1637 ,Amsterdam -February 17 ,1680 ) was a Dutch biologist and microscopist. His work oninsects demonstrated that the various phases during the life of an insect—egg,larva ,pupa , and adult—are different forms of the same animal. As part of his anatomical research, he carried out experiments onmuscle contraction . In 1668, he was the first to observe and describered blood cell s. He was one of the first people to use themicroscope in dissections, and his techniques remained useful for hundreds of years.Biography
Swammerdam was born in Amsterdam. His father was an
apothecary , and an amateur collector ofminerals , coins,fossils , andinsects from around the world. His mother died in 1661. The same year, when he was 24, Swammerdam entered theUniversity of Leiden to study medicine. After qualifying as a candidate in medicine in 1663, he left for France, spending time inIssy ,Saumur andParis withMelchisédech Thévenot . He returned to Leiden in September 1665, and earned his M.D. on February 22, 1667.Once he left university, he spent much of his time pursuing his interest in insects. This choice caused a rift between Swammerdam and his father, who thought his son should practice medicine. The relationship between the two deteriorated; Swammerdam's father cut off his financial support for Swammerdam's entomological studies. As a result, Swammerdam was forced, at least occasionally, to practice medicine in order to finance his own research.
From 1667 through 1674, Swammerdam continued his research and published three books. In 1675, he came under the influence of the Flemish mystic,
Antoinette Bourignon , renounced his work, and decided to devote the remainder of his life to spiritual matters.Niels Stensen , a gifted anatomist, and once his co-student, invited him to work for the Duke of Tuscany, but Swammerdam refused. There is evidence, however, that he did not completely give up his scientific studies. The papers, which he wished to be published posthumously, appear to have been revised during the last two years of his life. He died at age 43 of malaria. In 1737-1738, a half century after his death,Herman Boerhaave translated Swammerdam's papers into Latin and published them under the title "Biblia naturae" ("Book of Nature").Research on Insects
Knowledge of insects in the 17th century was to a great extent inherited from
Aristotle . According to this classical paradigm, insects were so insignificant they weren't worthy of the types of investigations done onfish ,reptiles , andmammals . Much of Swammerdam's entomological work was done to show that the difference between insects and the "higher" animals was one of degree, not kind. Swammerdam is credited with the enhancement of the study of biology due to his work dissecting insects and studying them under microscopes.Swammerdam's principal interest in this area was demonstrating that insects develop in the same gradual manner as other animals. He wanted to dispel the seventeenth-century notion of
metamorphosis —the idea that different life stages of an insect (e.g.caterpillar andbutterfly ) represent a sudden change from one type of animal to another. He garnered evidence against this claim from his dissections. By examining larvae, he identified underdeveloped adult features in pre-adult animals. For example, he noticed that the wings ofdragonflies andmayflies exist prior to their final molt. Swammerdam used these observations to bolster his case forepigenesis in his 1669 publication, Historia Insectorum Generalis (The Natural History of insects). This work also included many descriptions of insect anatomy. It was here that Swammerdam revealed that the "king" bee hasovaries . "Biblia natura" published posthumously in 1737, carried the first confirmation that the queen bee is the sole mother of the colony. Despite five intense years ofbeekeeping , the mode of honey bee reproduction escaped him as he wrote, "I do not believe the male bees actually copulate with the females." ["Biblia natura", 1737, translated to English as "The Book of Nature", 1758, by Swammerdam.]In addition to his research on metamorphosis, Swammerdam's entomological work stands out because he was among the first people to study insects in a systematized fashion (i.e., careful dissection, comparison of different species, and use of the microscope). His anat behavioral descriptions of
bees ,wasps ,ants ,dragonflies ,snails ,worm s, andbutterflies were major contributions to the nascent field ofentomology in the late seventeenth century.Besides "Historia", he published "Miraculum naturae sive uteri muliebris fabrica" in 1672 and "Ephemeri vita", in 1674. The latter was a study of the mayfly, written at a time when he was becoming increasingly involved in spiritual matters. The work contains long passages on the glory of the creator. His "
Bybel der Natuure " was a collection of his papers and drawings.Research on Anatomy
Swammerdam was not a pioneer in the study of anatomy as he was in study of insects, but he nonetheless made important contributions. His use of, and experiments with, frog muscle preparations played a key role in the development of our current understanding of
nerve -muscle function. The experiments introduced a new method of studying nerves, the frognerve-muscle preparation , which was still used centuries later.cite journal |author=Cobb M |title=Timeline: Exorcizing the animal spirits: Jan Swammerdam on nerve function |journal=Nature Reviews Neuroscience |volume=3 |issue=5 |pages=395–400 |year=2002 |pmid=11988778 |doi=10.1038/nrn806 |url=http://www.janswammerdam.net/NRN.pdf |format=pdf ]In one experiment, Swammerdam removed the heart of a frog and observed that touching certain areas of the brain caused certain muscles to contract. For Swammerdam, this was evidence that the brain, not the
circulatory system , was responsible formuscle contraction .Swammerdam played a key role in the debunking of the
balloonist theory , the idea that 'moving spirits' are responsible for muscle contractions. The idea, supported by the Greek physicianGalen , held that nerves were hollow and the movement of spirits through them propelled muscle motion.René Descartes furthered the idea by basing it on a model ofhydraulics , suggesting that the spirits were analogous to fluids or gasses and calling them 'animal spirits'. In the model, which Descartes used to explainreflex es, the spirits would flow from the ventricles of the brain, through the nerves, and to the muscles to animate the latter. According to this hypothesis, muscles would grow larger when they contract because of the animal spirits flowing into them. To test this idea, Swammerdam placed severed frog thigh muscle in an airtight syringe with a small amount of water in the tip. He could thus determine whether there was a change the volume of the muscle when it contracted by observing a change in the level of the water (image at right). When Swammerdam caused the muscle to contract by irritating the nerve, the water level did not rise but rather was lowered by a minute amount; this showed that no air or fluid could be flowing into the muscle. Swammerdam did not believe the results of his own experiment, suggesting that they were the result of artifact. However, he concluded in his book "The Book of Nature II" that "motion or irritation of the nerve alone is necessary to produce muscular motion". This idea that nerve stimulation led to movement had important implications forneuroscience by putting forward the idea that behavior is based on stimuli.Swammerdam also discovered valves in the lymphatic system, which were later dubbed Swammerdam valves.
Contributions to Methodology
Though Swammerdam's work on
insects andanatomy was significant, many current histories remember him as much for his methods and skill with microscopes as for his discoveries. He developed new techniques for examining, preserving, and dissecting specimens, including wax injection to make viewing blood vessels easier.pirituality
Swammerdam's scientific work was deeply influenced by his religious views. For him, studying the Earth's creatures revealed the greatness of God; scientific pursuits were pious activities. His spiritual views not only motivated his work, but also affected his ideas about the natural world. For example, he rejected
metamorphosis andspontaneous generation because they represented randomness and haphazardness that was not possible in a world regulated by God.His ultimate departure from the scientific scene in 1675 can also be attributed to his religiosity. Perhaps due to the influence of
Antoinette Bourignon , Swammerdam came to believe that his scientific work was no longer in the service of God. He thought he was conducting investigations into the natural world merely to satisfy his own curiosity. As a result, he subjected himself to the tutelage of Bourignon and, for the most part, renounced scientific study.External links
* [http://www.janswammerdam.net Site devoted to Swammerdam]
* [http://www.strangescience.net/swammerdam.htm Short biography from a website that chronicles the "rocky road to modern paleontology and biology"]
* [http://micro.magnet.fsu.edu/optics/timeline/people/swammerdam.html Biography written by Matthew Cobb, a professor at Laboratoire d'Ecologie in Paris]
* [http://www.dvjb.kvl.dk/English/ul/exhibitions/web%20exhibitions/insects.aspx Swammerdam insect plates from the University of Copenhagen Library]Bibliography
*Cobb M. 2002. [http://www.janswammerdam.net/NRN.pdf Exorcizing the animal spirits: John Swammerdam on nerve function] . "Nature Reviews", Volume 3, Pages 395-400.
*1911
*Winsor, Mary P. "Swammerdam, Jan." "Dictionary of Scientific Biography ." 1976
*Cobb, Matthew. "Reading and writing "The Book of Nature": Jan Swammerdam (1637-1680)." "Endeavour." Vol. 24(3). 2000.
*O'Connell, Sanjida. "A silk road to biology." "The Times." May 27, 2002.
*Hall, Rupert A. "From Galileo to Newton 1630-1720"R. &R. Clark, Ltd., Edinburgh: 1963.Further reading
*Jorink, Eric. "'Outside God there is Nothing': Swammerdam, Spinoza, and the Janus-Face of the Early Dutch Enlightenment." "The Early Enlightenment in the Dutch Republic, 1650-1750: Selected Papers of a Conference, Held at the Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenbuttel, 22-23 March 2001." Ed. Wiep Van Bunge. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Academic Publishers, 2003. 81-108.
*Fearing, Franklin. "Jan Swammerdam: A Study in the History of Comparative and Physiological Psychology of the 17th Century." "The American Journal of Psychology" 41.3 (1929): 442-455
*Ruestow, Edward G. "The Microscope in the Dutch Republic: The Shaping of Discovery". New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
*Ruestow, Edward G. "Piety and the defense of natural order: Swammerdam on generation." "Religion Science and Worldview: Essays in Honor of Richard S. Westfall." Eds. Margaret Osler and Paul Lawrence Farber. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1985. 217-241.
References and notes
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.