Blyth v. Birmingham Waterworks Co.
- Blyth v. Birmingham Waterworks Co.
"Blyth v. Birmingham Waterworks Co." (1856) 11 Ex 781; 156 E.R. 1047, is an English tort law case, which contains a famous statement of what it means to be negligent. At 784 Alderson B said,
ee also
*English tort law
Wikimedia Foundation.
2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Breach of duty in English law — In tort, there can be no liability in negligence unless the claimant establishes both that he or she was owed a duty of care by the defendant, and that there has been a breach of that duty. The defendant is in breach of duty towards the claimant… … Wikipedia
Wells v. Cooper — (1958) 2 All ER 527 is an England and Wales Court of Appeal judgment dealing with the issue of standard of care in English tort law. The question in the case was what standard of care could be expected of a person who carries out repairs in his… … Wikipedia
Mullin v. Richards — Mullins v. Richards [1998] 1 All ER 920 is a judgment of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, dealing with liability of children under English law of negligence. The question in the case was what standard of behaviour could be expected of a… … Wikipedia
Mullin v Richards — Mullins v Richards [1998] 1 All ER 920 is a judgment of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, dealing with liability of children under English law of negligence. The question in the case was what standard of behaviour could be expected of a… … Wikipedia
List of Statutory Instruments of the United Kingdom, 1989 — NOTOC This is a complete list of all 1534 Statutory Instruments published in the United Kingdom in the year 1989.1 100* Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Commencement No. 5) Order 1989 S.I. 1989/1 * Food Protection (Emergency Prohibitions) (Wales)… … Wikipedia