William de Corbeil

Infobox Archbishop of Canterbury
Full name = William de Corbeil


birth_name =
consecration = 18 February 1123
began = 22 July 1123
term_end = 21 November 1136
predecessor = Ralph d'Escures
successor = Theobald of Bec
birth_date = circa 1070
death_date = 21 November 1136
tomb = Canterbury Cathedral

William de Corbeil or William of Corbeil ("c". 1070–1136) was a medieval archbishop of Canterbury. Educated as a theologian, he served the bishops of Durham and London as a clerk before becoming a canon, a type of monk. He was elected as a compromise candidate to the see of Canterbury in 1123, succeeding Ralph d'Escures who had employed William as a chaplain. William was the first canon to become archbishop in England.

William was soon involved in a dispute over primacy with Thurstan, archbishop of York, and he also concerned himself with the morals of the clergy. He was known as a builder, having built the keep of Rochester Castle in England. At the end of his life, William was instrumental in the selection of Count Stephen of Boulogne as king of England instead of the Empress Matilda, daughter of King Henry I of England.

Early life

William de Corbeil was born probably at Corbeil on the Seine possibly around 1070,Barlow " [http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/6284 Corbeil, William de (d. 1136) (subscription required)] " "Oxford Dictionary of National Biography"] and was educated at Laon, where he taught for a while.Hollister "Henry I" p. 23] Otherwise, nothing is known of his early life.Spear "Norman Empire" "Journal of British Studies" p. 6] His teacher at Laon was Anselm of Laon, the noted scholastic and teacher of theology.Hollister "Henry I" p. 432] He had two brothers, Ranulf and Helgot, but nothing else is known about his parents or upbringing.

He joined the service of Ranulf Flambard, bishop of Durham as a clerk, and was present at the translation of the body of Saint Cuthbert in 1104. At some point, however, he seems to have transferred to the household of the archbishops of Canterbury, although the exact dating of this is unclear. It was in the period 1107 to 1112 that he went to Laon and attended Anselm of Laon's lectures. By 1116 he was a clerk of Ralph d'Escures, Archbishop of Canterbury, and went with Ralph to Rome in 1117 when Ralph was disputing with Thurstan the Archbishop of York over the primacy of the see of Canterbury.Bethell "English Black Monks and Episcopal Elections in the 1120s" "English Historical Review"] In 1118, though, he entered the Augustinian order at Holy Trinity Priory in Aldgate. Later he became prior of the Augustinian priory at St Osyth in Essex,Knowles, et. al. "Heads of Religious Houses" p. 183] Barlow "The English Church 1066-1154" p. 85] appointed by Richard de Beaumis, bishop of London in 1121.

Archbishop of Canterbury

After the death of Ralph d'Escures in October of 1122, King Henry I decided to allow a free election, and the new primate was chosen by the leading men of the realm, both ecclesiastical and secular.Cantor "Church, Kingship, and Lay Investiture" p. 282] #tag:ref|This would have included both the barons and earls as well as the leading royal servants on the secular side, and the bishops and some of the abbots on the ecclesiastical side.|group=notes The monks of the cathedral chapter and the bishops of the kingdom disagreed on who should be elected; with the bishops insisting on the election of a non-monk, and the monks insisting that they alone had the right to elect the archbishop and that the new archbishop must be a monk. However, only two bishops in either England or Normandy at this time were monks (Ernulf Bishop of Rochester and Serlo Bishop of Séez), and no monk other than Anselm of Canterbury, Ernulf, and Ralph d'Escures had been elected to an English or Norman see since 1091, so recent precedent favored the bishops. King Henry sided with the bishops, and told the monks they could elect their choice from a short list selected by the bishops. The list unsurprisingly contained no monks.Hollister "Henry I" p. 288-289]

On 2 FebruaryGreenway " [http://british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=33853 Fasti Ecclesiae Anglicanae 1066-1300: volume 2: Monastic cathedrals (northern and southern provinces: Canterbury: Archbishops] "] or 4 February 1123,Fryde, et. al. "Handbook of British Chronology" p. 232] William was chosen from among four candidates to the see of Canterbury, but the other three candidates' names are not known. William refused to concede that Thurstan, archbishop of York, was independent of the see of Canterbury, which led Thurstan to refuse to consecrate William. Instead, the ceremony was performed by William's own suffragan bishops on 18 February 1123. William was the first Augustinian consecrated Archbishop in England, a striking break with tradition that had favored monks in the see of Canterbury.Knowles "The Monastic Order in England" p. 175] As such, he caused some trepidation in the monks of the Canterbury chapter, who were "alarmed at the appointment, since he was a clerk," clerk here meaning a non-monastic clergy-member.quoted in Bartlett "England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings" p. 399]

Traveling to Rome for his pallium, the symbol of his authority as an archbishop, William discovered that Thurstan had already arrived and had presented his case to Pope Callixtus II. There were four objections against William's election, first that he was elected in the king's court, second that the chapter of Canterbury had been coerced and was unwilling, third that his consecration was unlawful because it was not performed by Thurstan, and fourth that a monk should be elected to the see of Canterbury, which had been founded by Saint Augustine of Canterbury, a monk. However, King Henry I and of the emperor Henry IV, King Henry I's son-in-law managed to persuade the pope to side with William, with the proviso that William swear to obey "all things that the Pope imposed upon him."quoted in Cantor "Church, Kingship, and Lay Investiture" p. 312-313] At the visit's conclusion the Pope denied the primacy of Canterbury over York; dismissing the Canterbury monk's documents as forgeries. William then returned to England, and was enthroned at Canterbury on 22 July 1123.

The archbishop's next opponent was the papal legate of the new Pope Honorius II, Cardinal John of Crema, who arrived in England in 1125. A compromise between York and Canterbury was hammered out, which involved Canterbury allowing York the supervision of the dioceses of Bangor, Chester, and St Aspah in return for the verbal submission of Thurstan and the written submission of Thurstan's successors. However, when the compromise was laid before the pope, the pope nixed it and substituted his own solution. This involved Honorius appointed William papal legate in England and Scotland in 1126. However, this was merely a postponment of the problem, as neither Thurstan or William had renounced their claims.

In ecclesiastical matters, William called legatine councils in 1125, 1127 and 1129 all at Winchester. The one in 1125 met under the direction of John of Crema, and prohibited simony, purchase of the sacraments, and the inheritance of clerical benefices. John of Crema had been sent to England, not only to seek a compromise in the Canterbury-York dispute, but to publicize the decrees of the First Council of the Lateran held in 1123. The legatine council of 1125 in England thus legislated on points from the Lateran Council. In 1127 the council condemned the purchase of benefices or the entry to clerical orders or of entry to religious houses. Lastly, in 1129 the clergy were once more admonished to live a celibate life and to put aside their wives.Cantor "Church, Kingship, and Lay Investiture" p. 275-276] The festival of the Conception was also allowed at one of these councils.Barlow "The English Church 1066-1154" p. 195] William also seems to have been somewhat eclipsed in ecclesiastical administration and appointments by Roger of Salisbury, Bishop of Salisbury and King Henry's primary advisor.Cantor "Church, Kingship, and Lay Investiture" p. 299] However, William reformed the nunnery of Minster-in-Sheppey, and put a college of regular canons at the church of St. Gregory's, in Canterbury. His legateship from Honorius lapsed when the pope died in February 1130, but was renewed by Honorius' successor Pope Innocent II in 1132.

William an architect

William designed the keep of Rochester Castle,Bartlett "England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings" p. 277] which at convert|115|ft|m is the tallest Norman-built keep in England. It is still intact, although it no longer has a roof or floors. The work at Rochester was built within the stone curtain walls that Gundulf of Rochester had erected in the late eleventh century. William built a stone keep within the walls for King Henry. The keep was not only designed for defence, but also had comfortable living quarters, which were probably intended for the use of the archbishops when they visited Rochester.Platt "The Castle in Medieval England & Wales" p. 23-24] In 1127, the custody of Rochester Castle was granted to William and his successors as archbishop by King Henry, including the right to fortify the place as the archbishops wished, and the right to garrison the castle with their own men.DuBoulay "The Lordship of Canterbury" p. 80] He also built a new church at Dover which he planned to staff with canons from Merton Priory, but the plan was interrupted by William's death, and the church instead was staffed from St Augustine's Abbey, Canterbury. William also finished the building of the Canterbury Cathedral, which was dedicated in May 1130.

The death of King Henry and the coronation of King Stephen

The archbishop swore to Henry I that he would support Henry's daughter Matilda's claim to the English throne, but after Henry's death William crowned Stephen king instead.Barlow "The English Church 1066-1154" p. 44-45] The archbishop was persuaded to do so by Henry of Blois, Bishop of Winchester and Stephen's brother, and it was this persuasion that lead to Stephen's crowning on 22 December 1135.Huscroft "Ruling England" p. 72] Hollister "Henry I" p. 478-479] Roger of Salisbury also was party to the consultations, and both bishops persuaded the archbishop that the oath had been imposed wrongly by Henry, and that in any event, the dying king had released the barons and the bishops from the oath. The royal steward, Hugh Bigod swore that he had been present at the deathbed, and had heard the king say that he released the oath.Crouch "The Normans" p. 247] It was this oath of Bigod's that helped persuade William to crown the king.Hollister "Anglo-Norman Succession Debate" "Journal of Medieval History" pp. 32-33] William did not long outlive Henry, as he died at Canterbury on 21 November 1136. William was buried in the north transept of Canterbury Cathedral.

Contemporaries were grudging in their praise, and William's reputation suffered after the ascension of Matilda's son Henry II of England to the throne. William of Malmesbury said that William was a courteous and sober man, with little of the flamboyant lifestyle of the more "modern" bishops. The "Gesta Stephani" author claimed that he was avaricious, and hoarded money. None of the chroniclers, however, doubted his piety, even when they named him a perjurer and a traitor for his coronation of Stephen.

Notes

Footnotes

References

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

Further reading

*Bethell, D. "William of Corbeil and the Canterbury–York dispute" "Journal of Ecclesiastical History" volume 19 (1968), p. 145–59
*Whitelock, D.; M. Brett, and C. N. L. Brooke, editors, "Councils and synods with other documents relating to the English church, 871–1204" Volume 2 (1981)

External links

* [http://www.pastscape.org.uk/hob.aspx?hob_id=416269&search=all&criteria=rochester%20castle Rochester Castle information from National Monuments Record]

Persondata
NAME=Corbeil, William de
ALTERNATIVE NAMES= William of Corbeil
SHORT DESCRIPTION=Prior of St. Osyth; Archbishop of Canterbury
DATE OF BIRTH= c. 1070
PLACE OF BIRTH=
DATE OF DEATH= 21 November 1136
PLACE OF DEATH=Canterbury