Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.

Infobox SCOTUS case
Litigants=Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.
ArgueDate=October 12
ArgueYear=1936
DecideDate=November 9
DecideYear=1936
FullName=Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.
USVol=299
USPage=65
Citation=
Prior=
Subsequent=
Holding=An inquiry into indispensability would be unnecessary where the complaint did not state a cause of action.
SCOTUS=1932-1937
Majority=Sutherland
JoinMajority=
Concurrence=
JoinConcurrence=
Concurrence2=
JoinConcurrence2=
Concurrence/Dissent=
JoinConcurrence/Dissent=
Dissent=
JoinDissent=
Dissent2=
JoinDissent2=
NotParticipating=Stone
LawsApplied=

"Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.", 299 U.S. 65 (1936), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that an inquiry into indispensability would be unnecessary where the complaint did not state a cause of action.

ee also

*List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 299

Further reading

*cite journal |last=Colby |first=Wm. E. |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=1942 |month= |title=The Law of Oil and Gas: With Special Reference to the Public Domain and Conservation |journal=California Law Review |volume=30 |issue=3 |pages=245–271 |doi=10.2307/3477673 |url= |accessdate= |quote=

caselaw source
case = Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co., 299 U.S. 65 (1936)
findlaw = http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=299&page=65
justia = http://supreme.justia.com/us/299/65/case.html