Unit-point atomism

According to some twentieth-century philosophers, [Paul Tannery (1887), "Pour l'histoire de la science Hellène" (Paris), and J. E. Raven (1948), "Pythagoreans and Eleatics" (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), are the major purveyors of this view. unit-point atomism was the philosophy of the Pythagoreans, a conscious repudiation of Parmenides and the Eleatics. It stated that atoms were infinitesimally small ("point") yet possessed corporeality. It was a predecessor of Democritean atomism. Most recent students of presocratic philosophy, such as Kurt von Fritz, Walter Burkert, Gregory Vlastos, Jonathan Barnes, and Daniel W. Graham have rejected that any form of atomism can be applied to the early Pythagoreans (before Ecphantus of Syracuse). [Gregory Vlastos and Daniel W. Graham (1996), "Studies in Greek Philosophy: The Presocratics" (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 257.]

Unit-point atomism was invoked in order to make sense of a statement ascribed to Zeno of Elea in Plato's "Parmenides": "these writings of mine were meant to protect the arguments of Parmenides against those who make fun of him. . . My answer is addressed to the partisans of the many. . ." [Jonathan Barnes (1982), "The Presocratic Philosophers" (London: Routledge), 232–33.] The anti-Parmenidean pluralists were supposedly unit-point atomists whose philosophy was essentially a reaction against the Eleatics. This hypothesis, however, to explain Zeno's paradoxes, has been thoroughly discredited.

Notes