- Sidney Faithorn Green
The Rev. Sidney Faithorn Green ("fl."
1865 -1882 ) was a Britishclergyman who, during the Ritualist controversies in theChurch of England , found himself imprisoned for three years for liturgical practice contrary to thePublic Worship Regulation Act 1874 .Background
Green was ordained a
priest of theChurch of England in1865 . He was a follower of theOxford Movement who celebrated theEucharist in the style ofAnglo-Catholicism , seeAnglican Eucharistic theology .Diggle (1890)]Timeline of imprisonment
*June
1869 : Green is appointed incumbent of St. John's,Miles Platting ,Manchester .
*January1871 : Green is admonished byBishop of Manchester James Fraser for mixingwater withwine in the service ofHoly Communion . Green agrees to abandon the practice.
*1874 : Green nominates Rev. Harry Cowgill as hiscurate but Fraser refuses to approve the nomination on the grounds of Cowgill's avowed refusal to accept the authority of theJudicial Committee of the Privy Council in church matters.
*May1877 , Fraser learns that Green is usingincense and unlawfulvestments , perceived as trappings ofAnglo-Catholicism , in his services. Green is again admonished and agrees to abandon the practice.
*May 18 ,1878 : Fraser receives a petition purporting to be from 320 of Green'sparish ioners accusing him of "propagation of false doctrine and deadly error".
*May 20 , 1878: Fraser responds coolly, pointing out the vagueness of the accusations and the similarity of thehandwriting in many of the "signatures".
*December 2 , 1878: TheChurch Association takes up the case and Fraser receives a "presentation" against Green charging, contrary to the Public Worship Regulation Act 1874:
*#The mixing of wine and water.
*#Lightedcandle s.
*#Unlawful vestments.
*#Kneeling during theprayer ofconsecration .
*#Elevating the paten and chalice.
*#Placing thealms on the credence instead of allowing them to lie on the Holy Table.
*#Using thesign of the cross towards the .
*#Performing the consecration in such a manner that the congregation could not see him break thebread or take the chalice in his hand.
*#Unlawfully and ceremoniously raising the chalice.
*#Unlawfully displaying a largebrass cross.
*#Displaying a "baldacchino ".
*December 3 , 1878: At an interview with Fraser, Green declines to submit to his authority on liturgical matters as "I should deny my Lord and imperil (peril?) my own salvation." Fraser declines to invoke his discretion to stay proceedings under the Act.
*December 23 , 1878: Fraser receives a petition supporting Green but is unimpressed by the standing of the signatories.
*June 14 ,1879 : The case is tried beforeJames Plaisted Wilde, Baron Penzance who upholds the charges.
*August 9 , 1879: Amonition is issued to Green prohibiting the practices complained of. Green persists and an order is made inhibiting him from exercising thecure of souls . Green persists and is held to be incontempt of court .
*November 25 , 1879: Lord Penzance issues a "significavit " to theCourt of Chancery of thecounty palatine of Lancaster notifying Green's contempt.
*March 9 ,1880 : The court issues thewrit "de contumace capiendo ".
*March 19 , 1880: Green is arrested and held inLancaster Castle . Cowgill, without the bishop's license, takes Green's place at Miles Platting but Fraser takes no action for fear of inflaming the situation.
*July 24 , 1880: An application is made to Lord Penzance for a ruling that Green is in contempt for non-payment of costs of £293 7s 8d.
*October 22 , 1880: An order for thesequestration of his property is served on Green.
*March,1881 : An application is made to theLord Chancellor ,Roundell Palmer, 1st Earl of Selborne , to take possession of Green's effects. The application is opposed.
*April 2 , 1881: The application is heard but Selborne defers his decision because of an impending challenge to theQueen's Bench related to Lord Penzance's action.
*April 6 , 1881: An application for a writ of "habeas corpus " is dismissed by the Queen's Bench.
*April 12 , 1881: An appeal is dismissed by Lords Brett and Cotton.
*May 7 , 1881: Selborne denounces the costs awarded against Green as a "great scandal".
*May 20 , 1881: Selborne reluctantly orders the sale of Green's effects.
*May 21 , 1881: TheEnglish Church Union obtain a legal opinion from SirJohn Holker andE. Vaughan Williams favouring an appeal by Green and implore him to do so.
*August 3 -4, 1881: An appeal to theHouse of Lords is heard by Selborne, Lord Blackburn and Lord Watson. It is dismissed.
*August 4, 1881: Green's effects are sold to defray the costs of the Church Association.
*September 21 , 1881: Fraser finally obtains an, at least nominal, undertaking from Green to obey his bishop's direction. Fraser writes to prime ministerWilliam Ewart Gladstone requesting that he petition Queen Victoria to exercise herRoyal Prerogative topardon Green. The case is forwarded to theLord Chancellor ,Roundell Palmer, 1st Earl of Selborne , andHome Secretary , Sir William Vernon Harcourt.
*October 25 , 1881: Green writes to Fraser emphasising that his submission to episcopal authority will not extend to disobedience to his conscience in liturgical matters.
*October 31 , 1881: Fraser writes to Gladstone to withdraw his petition for a pardon.
*January,1882 : A Mr. Leeds starts to assist Cowgill, who is suffering fromanxiety and fatigue, at Miles Platting. Fraser takes no action despite Leeds' unlicensed status.
*August, 1882: Selborne writes to Fraser to advise him that, three years having elapsed since the inhibition, Green's living at Miles Platting has lapsed under the Act. Green's detention now seems to serve little purpose but he was imprisoned for contempt and there is no trivial remedy. It seems unlikely that either Green or the Church Association will apply to the court for release but Fraser has no "locus standi ".
*October 17 , 1882: Fraser writes to Selborne advising him that Green is being guided by the English Church Union who regard deprivation of living under the Act with no greater gravity than any of its other provisions.
*October 20 , 1882: Fraser consults with his Chancellor,Richard Copley Christie , and writes to Selborne advising him of his resolve to free Green despite his fears for the consequences.
*November 4 , 1882: Fraser applies to Penzance for Green's release. The motion is unopposed, succeeds and Green is released that day. Green resigns his living in an attempt to deny the state's sequestration of his office. However, sequestration is already complete and Rev. W.R. Pym has been appointed as "locum".Later life
In
1883 , Green was appointed to a curacy at St. John's,Kensington and then in1889 asrector ofCharlton by Dover , an avowedly ritualist parish of whichKeble College, Oxford was patron. [Yates (1999) "p."265]References
Bibliography
*Bentley, J. (1987) "Ritualism and Politics in Victorian Britain: The Attempt to Legislate for Belief" ISBN 0-19-826714-2
*Diggle, J.W. (1890) "The Lancashire Life of Bishop Fraser", "pp"398-419
* cite book | url=http://justus.anglican.org/resources/pc/england/ecu/roberts/ | title=The History of the English Church Union 1859-1894 | author=Roberts, Rev. G. Bayfield | year=1895 | location=London | publisher=Church Printing (Project Canterbury)
* cite book | pages="pp"262-265 | title=Anglican Ritualism in Victorian Britain, 1830-1910 | author=Yates, N. | year=1999 | publisher=Oxford University Press | location=Oxford | id=ISBN 0198269897 | url=http://books.google.com/books?id=55aaZGqqh6oC&pg=PA244&lpg=PA244&dq=public+worship+regualtion+act+english+church+union&source=web&ots=Pr4Epd4hiA&sig=YbPgR7F-KK01DygP1duig-8slFk#PPA236,M1 (Google Books )
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.