- United States v. Shoshone Tribe of Indians
"United States v. Shoshone Tribe of Indians", 304 U.S. 111 (1938), was a United States Supreme Court case.
The case was argued March 31 and April 1, 1938 and was decided on April 25, 1938. The court's opinion written by Justice Butler. [ 304 U.S. 111, 58 S. Ct. 794, 82 L.Ed. 1213.] [Findlaw us|304|111]
Case Summary
By the Treaty of July 2, 1863 the
United States set apart for the Shoshone Tribe a reservation of convert|44672000|acre|ha located inColorado ,Utah ,Idaho , andWyoming . By the Treaty of July 3, 1868 the tribe ceded this reservation to the United States. The U.S. agreed that convert|3054182|acre|ha definitely described acres called the "district of country" would be set aside for the absolute and undisturbed use and occupation of the Shoshone Indians. The U.S. also agreed that no persons would be permitted to pass over, settle upon, or reside in that territory. The Shoshone Tribe subsequently made the reservation their permanent home. At the time the 1868 Treaty was made the tribe consisted of full blood Indians who were unable to read, write, or speak English. The reservation contained valuable mineral deposits of gold, oil, coal, andgypsum as well as over convert|400000|acre|ha of timber. In 1904, the Shoshones andArapahoe s ceded to the U.S. convert|1480000|acre|ha to be held by it in trust for the sale of timber, timber lands, and for the making of leases. The net proceeds were to be credited to the Indians. There were convert|245058|acre|ha allotted to members of the tribes from 1907 to 1919. The Court found the fair value of a one-half interest of the Shoshone reservation of a total of convert|2343540|acre|ha, which was taken by the U.S. for the Arapahoes on March 19, 1878 to be US$1,581,889.50. The lower court concluded that the tribe's interest in the land by the Treaty of 1868 included ownership of the mineral and timber rights. The Government appealed to the Supreme Court and asked for reversal with directions to determine the value of the Indians' right of use and occupancy excluding the value of any timber or minerals. The Supreme Court affirmed the lower court ruling and held that by the Treaty of 1868 the Shoshone Tribe had acquired the mineral and timber rights of the reservation. The Court reasoned that the minerals and standing timber were elements of the land itself and that for all practical purposes, the Tribe owned the land. The language of the Treaty did not suggest that the U.S. intended to retain for itself any interest in the minerals or timber. The Court ultimately concluded that the lower court was correct in holding that the right of the Shoshone Tribe included the timber and minerals within the reservation.References
External links
* [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=304&invol=111 Text at FindLaw]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.