Abdul Rahim Abdul Razak Al Ginco v. Robert M. Gates

Al Ginco v. Bush is a habeas corpus petition filed on behalf of a Guantanamo captive identified as Abdul Rahim Abdul Razak Al Ginco.cite news
url=http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/follow-ups-to-boumediene-begin/
title=Follow-ups to Boumediene begin
publisher=Scotusblog
author=
date=June 14 2008
accessdate=2008-06-18
quote=]

Appeal under the Detainee Treatment Act

Al Ginco v. Bush was one of captive who took advantage of an option in the Detainee Treatment Act that allowed captives to appeal the results of their Combatant Status Review Tribunals to a Washington DC appeals court.cite news
url=http://www.wilmerhale.com/files/upload/Boumediene_reply.pdf
title=Lakhdar Boumediene v. George W. Bush
publisher=United States Department of Justice
date=
accessdate=2008-06-18
quote= [http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wilmerhale.com%2Ffiles%2Fupload%2FBoumediene_reply.pdf&date=2008-06-18 mirror] ] The Bush Presidency placed a series of delays in these appeals, including claiming that they didn't need to produce any evidence beyond the "Summary of Evidence" memos prepared for their CSR Tribunals. When the appeals court overruled the Bush Presidency's argument, and ordered it to produce the evidence on which the allegations in the Summary of Evidence were based, the Bush Presidency claimed it had not kept records of the evidence used to justify the captives detention.

The Bush Presidency claimed it would have convene brand new CSR Tribunals.cite news
url=http://www.abanet.org/publiced/preview/briefs/pdfs/07-08/06-1195_PetitionerSuppAfter.pdf
title=Lakhdar Boumediene v. George W. Bush
publisher=United States Department of Justice
date=
accessdate=2008-06-18
quote= [http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.abanet.org%2Fpubliced%2Fpreview%2Fbriefs%2Fpdfs%2F07-08%2F06-1195_PetitionerSuppAfter.pdf&date=2008-06-18 mirror] ] The Bush Presidency had promised the DC court of appeals that a new CSR Tribunal would be convened for by October 2007.

The Supreme Court rules on Boumediene v. Bush

On June 12 2008 the United States Supreme Court ruled in Boumediene v. Bush that Guantanamo captives were entitled to access the US Justice system, including habeas corpus.Al Ginco v. Bush was the first case where petitioners requested the case be renewed in light of the ruling in Boumediene v. Bush.cite news
url=http://warcrimes.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/06/16/first-post-boumediene-developments-in-guantanamo-detainee-litigation/
title=First post-Boumediene developments in Guantanamo detainee litigation
publisher=Foreign Policy
author=
date=Monday, June 16, 2008
accessdate=2008-06-18
quote= [http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwarcrimes.foreignpolicyblogs.com%2F2008%2F06%2F16%2Ffirst-post-boumediene-developments-in-guantanamo-detainee-litigation%2F&date=2008-06-18 mirror] ]

Mandamus

In June 16 2008 the United States Supreme Court declined to consider his mandamus request.cite news
url=http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/06/16/Justices_reject_first_Gitmo_appeal/UPI-85151213652222/
title=Justices reject first Gitmo appeal
publisher=United Press International
date=June 16 2008
accessdate=2008-06-18
quote= [http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.upi.com%2FTop_News%2F2008%2F06%2F16%2FJustices_reject_first_Gitmo_appeal%2FUPI-85151213652222%2F&date=2008-06-18 mirror] ]

Abdul Rahim Abdul Razak Al Ginco is represented by Steven T. Wax and Stephen R. Sady of Portland, Oregon.

References

External links

*cite news
url=http://or.fd.org/GTMO/DTA_docs/Reply%20to%20Opposition%20to%20Expedition%20(4.24.07).pdf
title=Abdulrahim Abdul Razak Al Ginco v. Robert M. Gates -- 07-1090
publisher=United States Department of Justice
date=
accessdate=2008-06-18
quote=
*cite news
url=http://or.fd.org/GTMO/DTA_docs/Government's%20Reply%20to%20Opp%20to%20Remand%20(10.01.07).pdf
title=Abdulrahim Abdul Razak Al Ginco v. Robert M. Gates -- 07-1090
publisher=United States Department of Justice
date=
accessdate=2008-06-18
quote=