- Australopithecus garhi
Taxobox | name = "Australopithecus garhi"
fossil_range =Pliocene
regnum =Animal ia
phylum =Chordata
classis =Mammal ia
ordo =Primates
familia =Hominidae
genus = "Australopithecus "
species = "A. garhi"
binomial = †"Australopithecus garhi"
binomial_authority = Asfaw et al,1997 "Australopithecus garhi" is a
gracile australopithecine species whose fossils were discovered in1996 by a research team led byEthiopian paleontologistBerhane Asfaw and Tim White, an American paleontologist. The hominin remains were initially believed to be ahuman ancestor species and the finalmissing link between the "Australopithecus " genus and thehuman genus, "Homo". However it is now believed that "A. garhi", although more advanced than any otheraustralopithecine , was only a competitor species to the species ancestral to "Homo" and therefore not a human ancestor. The remains are from the time when there are very few fossil records, between 2.0 and 3.0 million years ago. Tim White was the scientist to find the first of the key "A. garhi" fossils in 1996 near the village of Bouri, located in theMiddle Awash ofEthiopia 'sAfar Depression . The species was confirmed and established as "A. garhi" onNovember 20 1997 by the Ethiopian paleoanthropologistYohannes Haile-Selassie . The species epithet "garhi" means "surprise" in the local Afar language.Morphology and interpretations
The traits of "A. garhi" fossils such as BOU-VP-12/130 are somewhat distinctive from traits typically seen in "
Australopithecus afarensis " and "Australopithecus africanus ". An example of the distinction can be seen when comparing the Hadar maxilla ("A. afarensis") to the Bouri specimen of "A. gahri". The cranial capacity of "A. garhi" measures 450cc, the same size as other australopithecines. The mandible classified as "Asfaw et al." has a morphology generally believed to be compatible with the same species, yet it is possible that another hominin species may have been found within the same deposits. Studies made on the premolars and molar teeth have a few similarities with those of "Paranthropus boisei " since they are larger than any other gracile form of australopithecine. It has been suggested that if "A. garhi" is ancestral to "Homo" (ie. "Homo habilis ") the maxillary morphology would have undergone a rapid evolutionary change in roughly 200,000 and 300,000 years.Earliest stone tools
Few primitive shaped stone tool artifacts closely resembling
Olduwan technology were discovered with the "A. garhi" fossils, dating back roughly 2.5 and 2.6 million years old. The23 April 1999 issue of "Science" mentions that the tools are older than those acquired by "Homo habilis", which is thought to be a possible direct descendant of more modernhominin s. For a long timeanthropologist s assumed that only members of early genus "Homo" had the ability to produce sophisticated tools. However, the crude ancient tools lack several techniques that are generally seen in later forms Olduwan andAcheulean such as strong rock-outcroppings. In another site inBouri , Ethiopia, roughly 3,000 stone artifacts had been found to be an estimated 2.5 million years old in age.References
*http://home.hetnet.nl/mr_9/95/krocat/english/news/news9.htm
*http://home.austarnet.com.au/stear/cg_australopithecus_garhi.htmee also
*
List of fossil sites "(with link directory)"
* List of hominina (hominid) fossils "(with images)"External links
*http://www.scienceinafrica.co.za/2001/nov/ancestor.htm
*http://www.archaeologyinfo.com/australopithecusgarhi.htm
*http://cas.bellarmine.edu/tietjen/Human%20Nature%20S%201999/australopithecus_garhi.htm
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.