8VSB

8VSB is the 8-level vestigial sideband modulation method adopted for terrestrial broadcast of the ATSC digital television standard in the United States, Canada, and other countries. 8VSB is capable of transmitting three bits (2³=8) at a time.

Throughput

In the 6 MHz (megahertz) channel used for broadcast ATSC, 8VSB carries a symbol rate of 10.76 Mbaud, a gross bit rate of 32 Mbit/s, and a net bit rate of 19.39 Mbit/s of usable data. The net bit rate is lower due to the addition of forward error correction codes. The eight signal levels are selected with the use of a trellis encoder. There are also the similar modulations 2VSB, 4VSB, and 16VSB. 16VSB was notably intended to be used for ATSC digital cable, but quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) has become the "de facto" industry standard instead.

Power saving advantages

A significant advantage of 8VSB for broadcasters is that it requires much less power to cover an area comparable to that of the earlier NTSC system, and it is reportedly better at this than the most common alternative system, COFDM. Some stations can cover the same area while transmitting at an effective radiated power of approximately 25% of analog broadcast power. While NTSC and most other analog television systems also use a vestigial sideband technique, the unwanted sideband is filtered much more effectively in ATSC 8VSB transmissions. 8VSB uses a Nyquist filter to achieve this. Reed-Solomon error correction is the primary system used to retain data integrity.

In summer of 2005, the ATSC published standards for Enhanced VSB, or E-VSB [http://www.tvtechnology.com/features/atsc/F_Whitaker.shtml] . Using forward error correction, the E-VSB standard will allow DTV reception on low power handheld receivers with smaller antennas in much the same way DVB-H does in Europe, but still using 8VSB transmission.

Disputes over ATSC's use

For some period of time, there had been a continuing lobby for changing the modulation for ATSC to COFDM, the way DVB-T is transmitted in Europe, and ISDB-T in Japan. However, the FCC has always held that 8VSB is the better modulation for use in U.S. digital television broadcasting. In a 1999 report, the Commission found that 8VSB has better threshold or carrier-to-noise (C/N) performance, has a higher data rate capability, requires less transmitter power for equivalent coverage, and is more robust to impulse and phase noise. [Citation
title = DTV REPORT ON COFDM AND 8-VSB PERFORMANCE
url = http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/reports/dtvreprt.pdf
publisher = FCC Office of Engineering and Technology
accessdate = 2007-03-04 , September 30, 1999.] As a result, it denied in 2000 a petition for rulemaking from Sinclair Broadcast Group requesting that broadcasters be allowed to choose between 8VSB or COFDM as is most appropriate for their area of coverage. [Citation
title = Sinclair Claims Wide Support For Dtv Petition
url = http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3169/is_41_19/ai_56290133
publisher = Television Digest with Consumer Electronics
accessdate = 2008-06-06 , Oct 11, 1999.] The FCC report also acknowledged that COFDM is "generally be expected to perform better in situations where there is dynamic multipath," such as mobile operation or in the presence of trees that are moving in high winds.Since the original FCC report, further improvements to VSB reception technologies as well as the introduction of E-VSB option to ATSC have reduced this challenge somewhat. Because of continued adoption of the 8VSB-based ATSC standard in the U.S., and a large growing ATSC receiver population, a switch to COFDM is now essentially impossible. Congress passed a law mandating that all analog terrestrial transmissions in the US will be turned off in February 2009, and 8VSB tuners are increasingly widespread in new TVs due to FCC tuner mandates, further complicating a future transition to COFDM.

Yet, a Centris study released in February 2008 revealed "serious 'gaps' in digital TV signal coverage across the country "when taking into account 'outdoor receiving antenna sensitivity and multipath interference.'" As a result, the Centris study states, "certain households - for example: those that are not elevated; are surrounded by trees; or have set-top antennas instead of roof-top antennas; among other factors - are at higher risk of having limited or no signal coverage. Centris surveys reveal that 75% or more of over-the-air households have only set-top antennas." [Citation
title = New Research Sheds Light On Major Glitch In The DTV Transition
url = http://www.centris.com/pages/ViewNews.aspx?newsID=34&SiteID=9
publisher = Centris
accessdate = 2008-06-06 , Feb 12, 2008.]

8VSB vs COFDM

The previously cited FCC Report also found that COFDM has better performance in dynamic and high level static multipath situations, and offers advantages for single frequency networks and mobile reception. Nonetheless, in 2001, a technical report compiled by the COFDM Technical Group concluded that COFDM did not offer any significant advantages over 8VSB. The report recommended in conclusion that receivers be linked to outdoor antennas raised to roughly 30 feet (9 m) in height. Neither 8VSB nor COFDM performed acceptably in most indoor test installations. [http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/archives/mstvtestsum.html 8VSB/COFDM Comparison Report] ]

However, there were questions whether the COFDM receiver selected for these tests − a transmitter monitor [http://www.computermodules.com/pdf/dtvm2000t.pdf] lacking normal front end filtering − colored these results. Retests that were performed using the same COFDM receivers with the addition of a front end band pass filter gave much improved results for the DVB-T receiver, but further testing was not pursued. [http://www.sbgi.net/dtv/newer/Receiver%20Anamoly%20Retest.pdf]

The debate over 8VSB versus COFDM modulation is still ongoing. Proponents of COFDM argue that it resists multipath far better than 8VSB. Early 8VSB DTV (digital television) receivers often had difficulty receiving a signal in urban environments. Newer 8VSB receivers, however, are better at dealing with multipath. Moreover, 8VSB modulation requires less power to transmit a signal the same distance. In less populated areas, 8VSB may outperform COFDM because of this. However, in some urban areas, as well as for mobile use, COFDM may offer better reception than 8VSB. In order to broaden the application of VSB, several "enhanced" VSB systems are now in development, most notably E-VSB, A-VSB, and MPH.

Bifurcation of digital transmission systems

The United States is also notable for creating a separate transmission system for digital radio. An in-band on-channel (IBOC) system developed by iBiquity will be used instead of the Eureka 147 Digital Audio Broadcasting system that has been selected in Europe. This is partially because the L band normally used for that technology is unavailable in the U.S. However, the American IBOC system uses COFDM, as does Eureka 147 and another standard known as Digital Radio Mondiale.

References

ee also

*ATSC tuner

External links

* [http://www.broadcast.net/~sbe1/8vsb/8vsb.htm What exactly is 8-VSB anyway?]