California Proposition 63 (2004)

California Proposition 63 (2004)

Proposition 63 was a proposition in the state of California on the November 2, 2004 ballot. The ballot measure was officially known as the "Mental Health Services Act". It passed with 6,191,691 (53.8%) votes in favor and 5,337,216 (46.2%) against.

It was an initiative statute that levied an additional 1% tax on incomes of $1,000,000 or greater to fundamental health service programs beginning January 1, 2005. Approximately 25,000 to 30,000 taxpayers were to be directly affected by the tax, generating an estimated $750 million in revenue during fiscal year 2005-06. At the time of the election, California income tax rates ranged from 1% to 9.3%, depending on a taxpayer's income level.

The initiative was written by then Assemblyman Darrell Steinberg (now State Senator) and Mental Health lobbyist Sherman Russell Selix, Jr. [http://www.sos.ca.gov/executive/press_releases/2003/03_094.pdf] Proposition 63 garnered much of its opposition from Scientologists.

Official summary

* Provides funds to counties to expand services and develop innovative programs and integrated service plans for mentally ill children, adults and seniors.
* Requires state to develop mental health service programs including prevention, early intervention, education and training programs.
* Creates commission to approve certain county mental health programs and expenditures.
* Imposes additional 1% tax on taxpayers' taxable personal income above $1 million to provide dedicated funding for expansion of mental health services and programs.
* Prohibits state from decreasing funding levels for mental health services below current levels.

Summary of Legislative Analyst's Estimate of Net State and Local Government Fiscal Impact:

* Additional state revenues of about $275 million in 2004-05 (partial year), $750 million in 2005-06, $800 million in 2006-07, and probably increasing amounts annually thereafter, with comparable annual increases in expenditures by the state and counties for the expansion of mental health programs.
* Unknown state and local savings from expanded county mental health services that partly offset the cost of this measure, potentially amounting to as much as the low hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

ee also

* List of California ballot propositions 2000-present

References

External links

* [http://www.healthvote.org/index.php/site/prop_home/C26/ HealthVote.org: Neutral information & analysis about the progress of Prop. 63 after the Nov. 2004 election]

* [http://www.voterguide.ss.ca.gov/propositions/prop63-title.htm VoterGuide.ss.ca.gov] - Voter Information Guide (with text of Proposition 63)


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужен реферат?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • California Proposition 1A (2004) — Proposition 1A was a proposition in the state of California on the November 2, 2004 ballot. The proposition successfully passed with 9,411,198 (83.7%) votes in favor and 1,840,002 (16.3%) against.The proposition is intended to protect revenues… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 64 (2004) — Proposition 64 was a proposition in the state of California on the November 2, 2004 ballot. It passed with 6,571,694 (59.0%) votes in favor and 4,578,725 (41.0%) against. It was an initiative statute that limits California s Unfair Competition… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 69 (2004) — California Proposition 69 was a successful 2004 California ballot proposition that allows for the collection of DNA samples from all felons and from people who have been arrested for certain crimes.… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 56 (2004) — Proposition 56 was a proposition in the U.S. state of California on the March 2, 2004 ballot. It failed to pass with 2,185,868 (34.3%) votes in favor and 4,183,188 (65.7%) against. It was intended to penalize politicians for every day that the… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 60A (2004) — Proposition 60A was a proposition in the state of California on the November 2, 2004 ballot. It passed with 7,776,374 (73.3%) votes in favor and 2,843,435 (26.7%) against. It was a legislative constitutional amendment intended to direct funds… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 57 (2004) — Proposition 57 was a proposition in the state of California on the March 2, 2004 ballot. It passed with 4,056,313 (63.4%) votes in favor and 2,348,910 (36.6%) against. It was officially called The Economic Recovery Bond Act . The proposition… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 60 (2004) — Proposition 60 was a proposition in the state of California on the November 2, 2004 ballot. It passed with 7,227,433 (67.6%) votes in favor and 3,478,774 (32.4%) against. It was a legislative constitutional amendment intended to codify in the… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 65 (2004) — Proposition 65 was a proposition in the state of California on the November 2, 2004 ballot. It failed to pass with 3,901,748 (37.6%) votes in favor and 6,471,506 (62.4%) against. It was a state constitutional amendment that would have required… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 58 (2004) — Proposition 58 was a proposition in the state of California on the March 2, 2004 ballot. It passed with 4,535,084 (71.2%) votes in favor and 1,841,138 (28.8%) against. It was officially called The California Balanced Budget Act . It forces state… …   Wikipedia

  • California Proposition 62 (2004) — Proposition 62 was a proposition in the state of California on the November 2, 2004 ballot. It failed to pass with 5,119,155 (46.1%) votes in favor and 5,968,770 (53.9%) against.It was an initiative constitutional amendment and statute that… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”