General Motors of Canada Ltd. v. City National Leasing

General Motors of Canada Ltd. v. City National Leasing

SCCInfoBox
case-name=General Motors of Canada Ltd. v. City National Leasing
full-case-name=General Motors of Canada Limited v. City National Leasing
heard-date=May 17, 18, 1988
decided-date=April 20, 1989
citations= [1989] 1 S.C.R. 641
docket=19724
ruling= Appeal dismissed
ratio=
SCC=1988-1988
Unanimous=Dickson C.J.
NotParticipating=
LawsApplied="Attorney General of Canada v. Canadian National Transportation, Ltd.", [1983] 2 S.C.R. 206; "MacDonald v. Vapor Canada Ltd.", [1977] 2 S.C.R. 134

"General Motors of Canada Ltd. v. City National Leasing" [1989] 1 S.C.R. 641, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the scope of the Trade and Commerce powers of the Constitution Act, 1867 as well as the interpretation of the Ancillary doctrine.

Background

During the 1970s General Motors(GM) sold vehicles to City National Leasing (CNL) as well as one of it competitors. It was discovered that GM was giving CNL's competitor a better interest rate than CNL, which violated the federal "Combines Investigation Act". In its defence GM argued that the provision in the Act that created the civil cause of action was outside the legislative competence of the federal government.

The motions judge found that the provision was "ultra vires" the federal government and struck it out. The Court of Appeal overturned the decision.

The issue before the Supreme Court was:
# whether the Combines Investigation Act, either in whole or in part, was intra vires Parliament under s. 91(2) of the Constitution Act, 1867, and
# whether s. 31.1 was within the legislative competence of Parliament.

Opinion of the Court

The Court found that the Act was valid under the "General" Trade and Commerce power, and that the provisions were necessarily incidental to the valid subject of the Act thus were valid as well.

Trade and commerce

The Court outlined the analysis for determining the constitutionality of a provision under the "general" branch of the Trade and Commerce power.First, it must be determined "whether the impugned provision can be viewed as intruding on provincial powers, and if so to what extent". Second, it must be determined "whether the act (or a severable part of it) in which the impugned provision is found is valid". This requires examination of several factors including those listed by the court:
# the impugned legislation must be part of a general regulatory scheme;
# the scheme must be monitored by the continuing oversight of a regulatory agency;
# the legislation must be concerned with trade as a whole rather than with a particular industry;
# the legislation should be of a nature that the provinces jointly or severally would be constitutionally incapable of enacting; and
# the failure to include one or more provinces or localities in a legislative scheme would jeopardize the successful operation of the scheme in other parts of the country.

Ancillary doctrine

The Court then considered whether the provision could be found valid under the ancillary doctrine. In examining the test established "Papp v. Papp", the Court re-articulated it. First, the law as a whole must be valid. If so, the Court must consider the degree of encroachment outside of the government's jurisdiction. If it is a serious encroachment the provision will only be upheld if it is necessarily incidental" to the function of the entire Act. For minor encroachments the provision need only have a "rational connection" to the entire Act. On the facts the Court found that the provisions were ancillary to the Act and so were upheld.

ee also

* List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Dickson Court)

External links

*


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужна курсовая?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (by author) — The following is a list of notable decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada sorted by author.Understanding what cases were authored by whom can be important. For example, in early interpretation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, it… …   Wikipedia

  • MacDonald v. Vapor Canada Ltd. — MacDonald v. Vapor Canada Ltd. , [1977] 2 S.C.R. 134 is a leading constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the Trade and Commerce power under section 91(2) of the Constitution Act, 1867 . BackgroundThe federal Trade marks Act… …   Wikipedia

  • Trafic et commerce — En droit constitutionnel canadien, l article 91(2)[1] de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1867 donne au gouvernement fédéral l autorité de légiférer en matière de réglementation du trafic et du commerce. Ce pouvoir fait généralement équilibre au… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Caractère véritable — Le caractère véritable est une théorie juridique en droit constitutionnel canadien qui tente de déterminer à quel chef de compétence se rapporte une législation donnée. La théorie est principalement utilisée lorsqu une loi est contestée pour le… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Caractere veritable — Caractère véritable Le caractère véritable est une théorie juridique en droit constitutionnel canadien qui tente de déterminer à quel chef de compétence se rapporte une législation donnée. La théorie est principalement utilisée lorsqu une loi est …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Caractère Véritable — Le caractère véritable est une théorie juridique en droit constitutionnel canadien qui tente de déterminer à quel chef de compétence se rapporte une législation donnée. La théorie est principalement utilisée lorsqu une loi est contestée pour le… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Canadian federalism — For the political ideology that favours Quebec remaining within the Canadian federation rather than pursuing independence, see Quebec federalist ideology. Canada This article is part of the series: Politics and government of Canada …   Wikipedia

  • Trade and Commerce — In Canadian constitutional law, section 91(2) of the Constitution Act, 1867 provides the federal government with the authority to legislate on matters related to the regulation of Trade and Commerce. This power is generally balanced against the… …   Wikipedia

  • Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Chief Justice McLachlin — The following is a list of Supreme Court of Canada opinions written by Beverley McLachlin during her tenure on the Court. Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin on November 20, 2007 Contents 1 …   Wikipedia

  • Tata Motors — Limited Type Public company Traded as NSE: TATAMOTORS …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”