- Argersinger v. Hamlin
Infobox SCOTUS case
Litigants=Argersinger v. Hamlin
ArgueDate=December 6
ArgueYear=1971
ReargueDate=February 28
ReargueYear=1972
DecideDate=June 12
DecideYear=1972
FullName=Argersinger v. Hamlin
USVol=407
USPage=25
Docket=70-5015
OralArgument=http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_5015/argument/
Procedural=Certiorari to theFlorida Supreme Court , 236 So. 2d 442.
Citation=92 S. Ct. 2006; 32 L. Ed. 2d 530; 1972 U.S. LEXIS 139
Prior=
Subsequent=
Holding=In all trials involving potential jail time, States are obligated to provide the accused with counsel.
SCOTUS=1972-1975
Plurality=Douglas
JoinPlurality=Brennan, Stewart, White, Marshall, and Blackmun
Concurrence=Brennan
JoinConcurrence=Douglas, Stewart
Concurrence2=Burger
Concurrence3=Powell
JoinConcurrence3=Rehnquist
NotParticipating=
LawsApplied=U.S. Const. amends. VI"Argersinger v. Hamlin", 407 U.S. 25 (1972) is a
United States Supreme Court decision holding that the accused in any criminal prosecution involving the potential deprivation of liberty is entitled to counsel. "Gideon v. Wainwright " made the right to counsel provided in theSixth Amendment applicable to the states through theFourteenth Amendment .ee also
*
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 407 External links
* [http://www.enfacto.com/case/U.S./407/25/ Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25 (1972)] (opinion full text).
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.