Water privatization in Argentina

Water privatization in Argentina

The privatization of water and sanitation services in Argentina between 1991 and 1999 under the government of Carlos Menem was part of one of the worlds largest privatization programs. Water and sanitation concessions with the private sector were signed in 28% of the country's municipalities covering 60% of the population.cite web
last = Galiani
first = Sebastian
authorlink =
coauthors = Gertler, Paul; Schargrodsky, Ernesto
title = Water for Life: The Impact of the Privatization of Water Services on Child Mortality
work =
publisher =
date = 2002-08-31
url = http://www.iadb.org/res/publications/pubfiles/pubS-233.pdf
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-02-14
, p. 9 ] The highest profile concession was signed in 1993 with a consortium led by the French firm Suez for the metropitan area of Buenos Aires. After the 2001 economic crisis, under the government of Nestor Kirchner, many concessions were renegotiated. Some were even terminated and the responsibility for service provision reverted to public entities, as it was the case in Buenos Aires where the newly created public enterprise "Aguas y Saneamientos Argentinos" took over the responsibility for service provision in 2006. [cite web
last = es icon
first =
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Argentinian government website on Public Services
work =
publisher =
date = 2005
url = http://www.argentina.gov.ar/argentina/portal/paginas.dhtml?pagina=377
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-02-14
] At the beginning of 2008, the government of the Province of Mendoza announced that it is interested in increasing its control of the provincial water utility "Obras Sanitarias de Mendoza", of which it owns 20%, buying another 20% from Saur International. [cite web
last = es icon Los Andes Newspaper
first =
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = El Gobierno busca reestatizar 20% de OSM
work =
publisher =
date = 2008-01-09
url = http://www.losandes.com.ar/2008/0109/politica/nota418344_1.htm
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-02-14
]

Impact of private sector participation

So far there has been no comprehensive, objective assessment of the impact of private sector participation in water supply and sanitation in Argentina. However, there has been some partial evidence. For example, a 2002 study assessed the impact of privatization on child mortality based on household survey data, finding that in the 1991-1997 period child mortality fell 5 to 7 percent more in areas that privatized compared to those that remained under public or cooperative management. It also found that the effect was largest in poorest areas (24%). [cite web
last = Galiani
first = Sebastian
authorlink =
coauthors = Gertler, Paul; Schargrodsky, Ernesto
title = Water for Life: The Impact of the Privatization of Water Services on Child Mortality
work =
publisher =
date = 2002-08-31
url = http://www.iadb.org/res/publications/pubfiles/pubS-233.pdf
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-02-14
, p. 1
] The authors estimate that the main reason is the massive expansion of access to water, which was concentrated in poorer areas that did not receive services before private sector participation was introducted.

The Buenos Aires concession

The largest and best-known case of private sector participation in the Argentinian water and sanitation sector was the Buenos Aires concession, signed in 1993 and revoked in 2006. Its impact remains controversial and in early 2008 an arbitration case was still pending with the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) of the World Bank Group.

Critics argue that the concessionaire failed to achieve the targets set under the concession contract. When the government rescinded the concession in March 2006, it argued that Aguas Argentinas did not comply with obligations concerning expansion and quality. According to the government, the supplied water had high levels of nitrate, pressure obligations were not kept and scheduled waterworks were not executed by the concessionaire. [cite journal
last = Solanes
first = Miguel
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Efficiency, Equity, and Liberalisation of Water Services in Buenos Aires, Argentina
journal = Industry, Services & Trade
volume = 2006
issue = 22
pages = 124-148
publisher = Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
location =
date =
url =
doi =
issn =
isbn = 9264028676
id =
accessdate =
, p. 168
] On the other hand, proponents of private participation state that a freeze in tariffs at the time of the devaluation of the Peso during the Argentinian economic crisis in 2001 substantially reduced the real value of tariff revenues and thus made it difficult to achieve the original targets.

One factor which may have caused the cancellation of the concession contract was the precipitate preparation. Alcazar et al. list some features of the concession which indicate an overhasty process: [cite journal
last = Alcázar
first = L.
authorlink =
coauthors = Abdala, A.; Shirley, M.
title = The Buenos Aires Water Concession. Policy Research Working Paper 2311.
journal =
volume =
issue =
pages =
publisher = The World Bank
location = Washington D.C.
date = 2000
url = http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2000/05/06/000094946_00042605364386/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdf
doi =
issn =
isbn =
id =
accessdate = 2008-04-16
, p. 20-23
]
# The regulatory agency ETOSS ("Ente Tripartito de Obras de Servicios de Saneamiento", Tripartite Entity for Sanitary Services) lacked experience, since it was founded quickly as part of the concession process.
# The available information in the concession contract about the state of the existing infrastructure was so poor, that the Argentinian government denied taking responsibility for it. This lack of information could have let the bidder to accept the contract in the expectation of future renegotiation. [cite journal
last = Alcázar
first = L.
authorlink =
coauthors = Abdala, A.; Shirley, M.
title = The Buenos Aires Water Concession. Policy Research Working Paper 2311.
journal =
volume =
issue =
pages =
publisher = The World Bank
location = Washington D.C.
date = 2000
url = http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2000/05/06/000094946_00042605364386/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdf
doi =
issn =
isbn =
id =
accessdate = 2008-04-16
, p. 41
]
# Instead of creating a new and more transparent tariff system, the old one was adopted from OSN.In addition, the inexperienced regulatory agency was repeatedly bypassed when decisions were taken, for example in the renegotiation of the contract in 1997. In that way, ETOSS was further weakened. [cite journal
last = Alcázar
first = L.
authorlink =
coauthors = Abdala, A.; Shirley, M.
title = The Buenos Aires Water Concession. Policy Research Working Paper 2311.
journal =
volume =
issue =
pages =
publisher = The World Bank
location = Washington D.C.
date = 2000
url = http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2000/05/06/000094946_00042605364386/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdf
doi =
issn =
isbn =
id =
accessdate = 2008-04-16
, p. 37
] The concession contract authorized Aguas Argentinas to demand dollars at the old 1:1 exchange rate after the peso devaluation. Solanes points out that without this practice companies may seek financing in local capital markets to avoid currency fluctuations. He also argues that the needs of the poor were not addressed in the concession. No subsidies were provided for the poor and the tariff system did not encourage expansion of coverage to poor areas, since new connections were often unaffordable and new users also had to pay the costs of expanding the network. [cite journal
last = Solanes
first = Miguel
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Efficiency, Equity, and Liberalisation of Water Services in Buenos Aires, Argentina
journal = Industry, Services & Trade
volume = 2006
issue = 22
pages = 124-148
publisher = Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
location =
date =
url =
doi =
issn =
isbn = 9264028676
id =
accessdate =
, p. 158-164
]

The concessionaire did invest much more than its public predecessor and achieved substantial increases in access to water and sewerage. According to the Argentinian economist Sebastian Galiani, the public company OSN had invested only US$25m per year between 1983 and 1993, while the private concessionaire Aguas Argentinas increased investments to around US$200 m per year between 1993 and 2000. [cite web
last = Galiani
first = Sebastian
authorlink =
coauthors = Gertler, Paul; Schargrodsky, Ernesto
title = Water for Life: The Impact of the Privatization of Water Services on Child Mortality
work =
publisher =
date = 2002-08-31
url = http://www.iadb.org/res/publications/pubfiles/pubS-233.pdf
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-02-14
, p. 15
]

According to Suez, during the 13 year-duration of its concession it extended access to water to 2 million people and access to sanitation to 1 million people, despite the economic crisis. Between 2003 and 2005 alone about 100,000 inhabitants of poor neighborhoods and slums are said to have been connected through a "participatory management model" piloted by Aguas Argentinas. Aspects of the model have been adopted by the government to extend services to another 400,000 people in La Matanza in the province of Buenos Aires in the project "Water plus work" ("Aguas más trabajo"). [cite web
last = Suez Environment
first =
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Argentinian official website
work =
publisher =
date =
url = http://argentina.suez-environnement.com/en/nos-engegagements/agua-mas-trabajo/sustainable-solutions/sustainable-solutions/
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-02-18
]

An example of local private sector participation: Salta

The government of Salta Province initiated the reform of its water sector in 1996. At the same time many other Argentinian provinces and municipalities brought in the private sector to improve water and sanitation services. While Salta also followed this approach, the process differed somewhat from the one in many other parts of Argentina. cite web
last = Saltiel
first = Gustavo
authorlink =
coauthors = Maywah, Nicole
title = Argentina: The Salta Public-Private Partnership
work =
publisher =
date = February 2007
url = http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTENBREVE/Newsletters/21455620/Feb07_102_Salta_EN.pdf
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-03-20
]

First, the provincial government conducted a series of meetings with municipalities and user organizations to discuss the benefits and risks of the concession before it was bid out. This process of consultations was continued by the private concessionaire after the contract was awarded. Second, the government decided from the onset that water and sanitation services in the poor province could not be financed entirely through tariff revenues. It thus decided to finance much of the investments to be undertaken by the private concessionaire with public grants, in addition to providing consumption subsidies. Third, the regulatory agency allowed the concessionaire to provide services at a lower standard in remote or isolated areas that were deemed unprofitable at conventional service standards. Fourth, the provincial regulatory agency granted tariff increases before and even after the 2001 economic crisis. These tariff increases were lower than it would have been necessary without subsidies or flexible service standards. And fifth, the government "ignored the traditional paradigm of only permitting companies with singificant previous experience in water supply and sanitation to compete in the bidding process". This provision had favored a few large multinational water firms in other bidding processes. In Salta, however, the bid was won by the Argentinian construction, power and toll road enterprise MECON S.A. which signed a technical assistance contract with the Brazilian Paraná State public utility SANEPAR. cite web
last = Saltiel
first = Gustavo
authorlink =
coauthors = Maywah, Nicole
title = Argentina: The Salta Public-Private Partnership
work =
publisher =
date = February 2007
url = http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTENBREVE/Newsletters/21455620/Feb07_102_Salta_EN.pdf
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-03-20
]

The private concession led to a substantial increase in access to water and sanitation from the time of concession award in 1999 to 2005. It also provided a significant decrease in service interruptions and improved customer service. 13 more municipalities joined the concession contract after it had been signed in order to share in its benefits, bringing the total number of municipalities served by the concessionaire to 56. cite web
last = Saltiel
first = Gustavo
authorlink =
coauthors = Maywah, Nicole
title = Argentina: The Salta Public-Private Partnership
work =
publisher =
date = February 2007
url = http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTENBREVE/Newsletters/21455620/Feb07_102_Salta_EN.pdf
format =
doi =
accessdate = 2008-03-20
]

While most other private water concessions in Argentina were rescinded in the aftermath of the 2001 economic crisis, the Salta concession has been upheld. Nevertheless, the concession is not without problems. For example, in February 2008 the regulatory agency initiated penal proceedings against the concessionaire because one of its wastewater treatment plants discharging to the Arenales River was not functioning. [ [http://noticias.iruya.com/content/view/3190/412/ Aguas de Salta denunciada penalmente por vertido de líquidos cloacales al río Arenales] ]

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем сделать НИР

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Water privatization — is a short hand for private sector participation in the provision of water services and sanitation, although more rarely it refers to privatization of water resources themselves. Because water services are seen as such a key public service,… …   Wikipedia

  • Water privatization in Brazil — has been initiated in 1996. In 2008 private companies provided 7 million Brazilians 4% of the urban population in 10 of the country’s 26 states with drinking water. The private sector holds 65 concession contracts in the states of São Paulo, Rio… …   Wikipedia

  • Water privatization in Chile — The privatization of water in Chile was undertaken from 1998 to 2005 under the democratically elected governments of Eduardo Frei and Ricardo Lagos. Chile is the only country in Latin America that privatized its entire urban water supply and… …   Wikipedia

  • Water privatization in Colombia — Private sector participation in Colombia s water and sanitation sector has been much more stable than in some other Latin American countries. [ For example, private water concessions in Buenos Aires, Argentina, many other cities in Argentina, as… …   Wikipedia

  • Water supply and sanitation in Argentina — Argentina faces five key challenges in the water supply and sanitation sector: (i) low coverage with higher levels of service provision for its income level; (ii) poor service quality; and (iii) high levels of pollution; (iv) low cost recovery;… …   Wikipedia

  • Water politics — Water politics, sometimes called hydropolitics, is politics affected by water and water resources.The first use of the term, hydropolitics, came in the book by John Waterbury, entitled Hydropolitics of the Nile Valley, Syracuse University Press,… …   Wikipedia

  • Water supply and sanitation in Nicaragua — is provided by a national public utility in urban areas and water committees in rural areas. Despite relatively high levels of investment, access to water in urban areas has barely kept up with population growth, access to urban sanitation has… …   Wikipedia

  • Argentina — /ahr jeuhn tee neuh/; Sp. /ahrdd hen tee nah/, n. a republic in S South America. 35,797,536; 1,084,120 sq. mi. (2,807,870 sq. km). Cap.: Buenos Aires. Also called the Argentine. Official name, Argentine Republic. * * * Argentina Introduction… …   Universalium

  • ARGENTINA — ARGENTINA, South American Federal Republic, general population (2004) 39,150,000; Jewish population 190,000. This entry is arranged according to the following outline: colonial period modern period legal basis for jewish life history EARLY JEWISH …   Encyclopedia of Judaism

  • Water supply and sanitation in Mendoza — The debate about water supply and sanitation in Mendoza has been dominated by the controversial private concession for the provincial water company OSM granted in 1998 to a consortium led by Enron. While the concession improved water and… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”