Women and animal advocacy

Several writers have argued that the animal advocacy movement — embracing animal rights, animal welfare, and anti-vivisectionism — has been disproportionately initiated and led by women.

Many of the major animal advocacy groups, all regarded as radical in their time, were founded by women, including the Battersea Dogs' Home (Mary Tealby, 1860), the National Anti-Vivisection Society (Frances Power Cobbe, 1875), the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (Frances Power Cobbe, 1898), the Animal Welfare Institute (Christine Stevens, 1951), and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Ingrid Newkirk, 1980). Women also feature prominently in actions carried out in the name of the Animal Liberation Front and the Hunt Saboteurs Association. [Ingrid Newkirk|Newkirk, Ingrid. "Free the Animals: The Amazing True Story of the Animal Liberation Front", New York: Lantern Books, 2000.]

History

Personhood, women, and animals

Carol Adams argues that personhood was until recently regarded as the preserve of the white European man, with everyone else deemed "Other" — other races, other species, the other sex — all identified with the forces of nature and superstition, as opposed to the world of science and reason. [Adams, Carol. "The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory", cited in Taylor, Angus. "Animals and Ethics". Broadview Press, 2003, p. 103.] Women, blacks, and beasts were irrational and inferior. When Mary Wollstonecraft wrote "A Vindication of the Rights of Women" in 1792, philosopher Thomas Taylor responded anonymously in the same year with "A Vindication of the Rights of Brutes", in which he demonstrated that arguments for the oppression or liberation of women applied equally well to animals, intending it as a "reductio ad absurdum" of Wollstonecraft's position.Sunstein, Cass R. [http://www.nytimes.com/books/00/02/20/reviews/000220.20sunstet.html?_r=1&oref=slogin The Chimps' Day in Court] , "The New York Times", February 20, 2000.]

uffragettes and animals

Coral Lansbury writes that the suffragette movement in the UK became closely linked with the anti-vivisection movement. Writing about the Brown Dog affair, a controversy about animal research that raged in Edwardian England, she argues that the iconography of vivisection struck a chord with women. The vivisected dog muzzled and strapped to the operating board was a symbolic reminder of the suffragette on hunger strike restrained and force-fed in Brixton Prison, as well as women strapped into the gynaecologist's chair by their male doctors, for childbirth, for sterilization as a cure for "hysteria," and as objects of study by male medical students.Lansbury, Coral. "The Old Brown Dog: Women, Workers, and Vivisection in Edwardian England". The University of Wisconsin Press, 1985, pp. x and 24.]

ee also

*Brown Dog affair

References

Further reading

* [http://www.farinc.org/ Feminists for Animal Rights]
*Donovan, Josephine. "Animal Rights and Feminist Theory," "Signs", Vol. 15, No. 2 (Winter, 1990), pp. 350-375.
*Gaarder, Emily. [http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p103868_index.html "The 'Gender' Question of Animal Rights: Why are Women the Majority?"] , paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Montreal Convention Center, August 11, 2006.
*Kean, Hilda. "Animal Rights: Political and Social Change in Britain since 1800".
*Lansbury, Coral. "The Old Brown Dog: Women, Workers, and Vivisection in Edwardian England". The University of Wisconsin Press, 1985.