- Legacies of apartheid
The end of the
apartheid system inSouth Africa left the country socio-economically divided by race. Subsequent government policies have sought to correct the imbalances through state intervention.Economic inequality and Black Economic Empowerment
Many of the inequalities created and maintained by apartheid still remain in South Africa. The country has one of the most unequal income distribution patterns in the world: approximately 60% of the population earns less than R42,000 per annum (about US$7,000), whereas 2.2% of the population has an income exceeding R360,000 per annum (about US$50,000).
Poverty in South Africa is still largely defined by skin colour, withblack people constituting the poorest layer. Despite the ANC government having implemented a policy ofBlack Economic Empowerment (BEE), blacks make up over 90% of the country's poor but only 79.5% of the population.cite news|url=http://www.wsws.org/articles/2004/may2004/safr-m21.shtml|title=United Nations report highlights growing inequality in South Africa|publisher=World Socialist Website|date=21 May 2004|accessdate=2007-02-07] [cite web
url=http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0302/P03022006.pdf
title=Mid-year population estimates, South Africa
format=PDF
date=2006
publisher=Statistics South Africa]Part of the policy of Black Economic Empowerment is the imposition of 'employment equity' targets. In terms of this, companies are assessed based on their racial composition. To attain the 'correct' racial balance in a company, the Employment Equity Act allows for legal discrimination against White males and to a lesser extent White females when appointing staff. Government contracts and a few in the private sector are also preferentially awarded to companies with good BEE ratings. In September 2006 the Labour Ministry ordered private companies to classify their employees according to race. The classification was to be done based on a form that every employee had to complete, which used the apartheid-era racial categories. On the form the employee had to confirm whether they regarded themselves as White, Indian, Coloured or African. [cite news|title=Labour race classification criticised|publisher=iafrica.com|date=27 September 2006|url=http://business.iafrica.com/empowerment/214982.htm] This caused some controversy and some employees refused to classify themselves saying it was a return to the race classification system of the Apartheid era. In such cases employers were forced in terms of the Employment Equity Act to do a classification based on the general appearance of those employees who refused to classify themselves.
Land ownership inequality and land claims
Eighty percent of farming land still remains in the hands of white farmers; [cite news|title=S African white farm to be seized
url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/4273890.stm
date=23 September 2005|publisher=BBC] the requirement that claimants for restoration of land seized during the apartheid era make a contribution towards the cost of the land "excludes the poorest layers of the population altogether", while a large number of white farmers have been murdered since 1994 (roughly 313 per 100 000 annually) in what campaign groups claim is a campaign of genocide. [cite web|title=The Farm Murder Plague
url=http://www.christianaction.org.za/firearmnews/2004-03_Thefarmmurderplague.htm] [cite web|title=Stop Boer Genocide|url=http://www.stopboergenocide.com/]Human Rights Watch contend that the publicity given to these murders and attacks removes attention from the plight of poor black rural people, and contend that they are purely criminal in nature.cite book | author=Bronwen Manby | title=Unequal Protection - The State Response to Violent Crime on South African Farms | publisher=Human Rights Watch |date=August 2001 | url=http://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/safrica2/ | accessdate=2006-10-28 | id=ISBN 1-56432-263-7] Regardless, crime against white farmers receives strong media coverage. Opposition against land reforms fear that by removing commercial farmers from their land and dividing up the land to poor urbanized people with no comprehension of agriculture or agricultural management would lead to a state offamine like the one being experienced inZimbabwe at the moment.In
Durban a large movement ofshack dwellers has mobilized against city authorities claiming that popular attempts to desegregate the city in the 1980s are now being reversed by the mass eviction of shack dwellers. [cite web|url=http://www.abahlali.org|title=Abahlali baseMjondolo]HIV/AIDS epidemic
In 1982, the first recorded death from
AIDS occurred in the country. Within a decade, the number of recorded AIDS cases (overwhelmingly in the black population) had risen to over 1,000, and by the mid-1990s, it had reached 10,000.In late 1980s, the
South African Chamber of Mines began an education campaign to try to stem the rise of cases. But without a change in the underlying conditions of mine workers, a major factor contributing to the epidemic, success could hardly be expected. Long periods away from home under bleak conditions and a few days leave a month were the apartheid-induced realities of the life thousands of miners and other labourers worked. Compounding the problem was the fact that as of the mid-1990s, many health officials still focused more on the incidence oftuberculosis than HIV.ee also
*
South Africa under apartheid
*Negotiations to end apartheid in South Africa
*Crime of apartheid References
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.