- Evolutionary ideas of the renaissance and enlightenment
Evolutionary ideas of the renaissance and enlightenment developed as
natural history became more sophisticated during the 17th and 18th centuries, and as thescientific revolution and the rise ofmechanical philosophy encouraged viewing the natural world as a machine whose workings were subject to analysis. Despite this the evolutionary ideas of the early 18th century were of a religious and spiritural nature. In the 2nd half of the 18th century more materialistic and explicit ideas about biologicalevolution began to emerge making this an important era in thehistory of evolutionary thought .17th and early 18th century
The word "evolution" (from the
Latin "evolutio", meaning "to unroll like a scroll") appeared in English in the 17th century, referring to an orderly sequence of events, particularly one in which the outcome was somehow contained within it from the start. Notably, in 1677 Sir Matthew Hale, attacking theatheist ic atomism of Democritus and Epicurus, used the term "evolution" to describe his opponent's ideas that vibrations and collisions of atoms in the void — without divine intervention — had formed "Primordial Seeds" (semina) which were the "immediate, primitive, productive Principles of Men, Animals, Birds and Fishes."cite journal|last=Goodrum|first=|Matthew R.|title=Atomism, Atheism, and the Spontaneous Generation of Human Beings: The Debate over a Natural Origin of the First Humans in Seventeenth-Century Britain|journal=Journal of the History of Ideas|volume=63 No. 2|pages=207–224|date=April 2002] For Hale, this mechanism was "absurd", because "it must have potentially at least the whole Systeme of Humane Nature, or at least that Ideal Principle or Configuration thereof, in the evolution whereof the complement and formation of the Humane Nature must consist ... and all this drawn from a fortuitous coalition of senseless and dead Atoms."While Hale (ironically) first used the term evolution in arguing "against" the exact mechanistic view the word would come to symbolize, he also demonstrates that at least some evolutionist theories explored between 1650 and 1800 postulated that the universe, including life on earth, had developed mechanically, entirely without divine guidance. Around this time, the
mechanical philosophy ofDescartes , reinforced by thephysics ofGalileo and Newton, began to encourage the machine-like view of the universe which would come to characterise thescientific revolution . [ wikiref|id=Bowler-2003|text=Bowler 2003 pp. 33-38 ] However, most contemporary theories of evolution, including those developed by the German idealist philosophers Schelling andHegel (and mocked bySchopenhauer ), held that evolution was a fundamentally "spiritual" process, with the entire course of natural and human evolution being "a self-disclosing revelation of the Absolute". [Schelling, "System of Transcendental Idealism", 1800]Typical of these theorists,
Gottfried Leibniz postulated in 1714 that "monad s" inside objects caused motion by internal forces, and maintained that "the 'germs' of all things have always existed ... [and] contain within themselves an internal principle of development which drives them on through a vast series of metamorphoses" to become the geological formations, lifeforms, psychologies, and civilizations of the present. Leibniz clearly felt that evolution proceeded on divine principles — in his "De rerum originatione radicali" (1697), he wrote: "A cumulative increase of the beauty and universal perfection of the works of God, a perpetual and unrestricted progress of the universe as a whole must be recognized, such that it advances to a higher state of cultivation." [ wikiref |id=Lovejoy-1936 |text=Lovejoy 1936, p. 257] Others, such asJ. G. von Herder , expressed similar ideas. [ wikiref |id=Lovejoy-1936 |text=Lovejoy 1936, pp. 183–184, 279–280, 369]Mid 18th century
In his "Venus Physique" in 1745, and "System of Nature" in 1751,
Pierre Louis Maupertuis veered toward more materialist ground. He wrote of natural modifications occurring during reproduction and accumulating over the course of many generations, producing races and even new species. He also anticipated in general terms the idea ofnatural selection . [ wikiref|id=Bowler-2003|text= Bowler 2003 pp. 73–75]Vague and general ideas of evolution continued to proliferate among the mid-eighteenth century Enlightenment philosophers.
G. L. L. Buffon suggested that what most people referred to as species were really just well-marked varieties. He thought that the members of what was then called a genus (which in terms of modernscientific classification would be considered a family) are all descended from a single, common ancestor. The ancestor of each family had arisen throughspontaneous generation ; environmental effects then caused them to diverge into different species. He speculated that the 200 or so species of mammals then known might have descended from as few as 38 original forms. Buffon's concept of evolution was strictly limited. He believed there were "internal molds" that shaped the spontaneous generation of each family and that the families themselves were entirely and eternally distinct. Thus, lions, tigers, leopards, pumas and house cats could all share a common ancestor, but dogs and house cats could not. [ wikiref|id=Bowler-2003|text= Bowler 2003 pp. 75–80] [wikiref|id=Larson-2004|text= Larson 2004 pp. 14–15] Although Darwin's foreword to his 6th edition of "Origin" creditedAristotle with foreshadowing the concept ofnatural selection , he also wrote that "the first author who in modern times has treated it in a scientific spirit was Buffon". [ wikiref|id =Darwin-1872|text= Darwin 1872 p. 9]Between 1767 and 1792
James Burnett, Lord Monboddo included in his writings not only the concept that that man had descended from primates, but also that, in response to their environment, creatures had found methods of transforming their characteristics over long time intervals. He also produced research on the evolution oflinguistics , which was cited by Erasmus Darwin in his poem (see below). [wikiref|id=Darwin-1825|text= Darwin, Erasmus 1825 p. 9] Jan-Andrew Henderson states that Monboddo was the first to articulate the theory ofnatural selection . [ wikiref|id=Henderson-2000| text=Henderson 2000]In 1792, philosopher
Immanuel Kant presented, in hisCritique of Judgement , what he referred to as “a daring venture of reason”, in which “one organic being [is] derived from another organic being, although from one which is specifically different; e.g., certain water-animals transform themselves gradually into marsh-animals and from these, after some generations, into land-animals.” [wikiref|id=Kant-1792|text= Kant 1792 Section 80]In 1796,
Erasmus Darwin publishedZoönomia , which suggested "that all warm-blooded animals have arisen from one living filament ... with the power of acquiring new parts" [ wikiref|id=Darwin-1818|text=Darwin, Erasmus 1818 Vol I section XXXIX] in response to stimuli, with each round of improvements being inherited by successive generations. In his 1802 poem "Temple of Nature", he described the rise of life from minute organisms living in the mud to its modern diversity:First forms minute, unseen by spheric glass,
Move on the mud, or pierce the watery mass;
These, as successive generations bloom,
New powers acquire and larger limbs assume;
Whence countless groups of vegetation spring,
And breathing realms of fin and feet and wing. [wikiref|id=Darwin-1825|text= Darwin, Erasmus 1825 p. 15]Notes
References
*
*Citation
last = Darwin
first = Charles
author-link =Charles Darwin
year = 1872
title =The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life
edition =6th
publication-place = London
publisher =John Murray
url =http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F391&viewtype=text&pageseq=1
accessdate =2007-11-19
*cite book|last=Darwin|first=Erasmus|authorlink=Erasmus Darwin|year=1825|title="The Temple of Nature, or The Origin of Society"|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=oAl9y-0FSJQC&dq=Erasmus+Darwin+Temple
*cite book|last=Darwin|first=Erasmus|year=1818|title="Zoonomia"|url=http://www.gutenberg.org/files/15707/15707-h/15707-h.htm
*cite book|last=Henderson|first=Jan-Andrew|title="The Emperor's Kilt: The Two Secret Histories of Scotland"|publisher=Mainstream Publishing|year=2000
*cite book|last=Kant|first=Immanuel|authorlink =Immanuel Kant|title = Kant’s Critique of Judgement, translated with Introduction and Notes by J.H. Bernard (2nd ed. revised) (London, 1914)|year = 1792|publisher = Macmillan
*cite book|last=Larson|first=Edward J.|authorlink=Edward Larson|title=Evolution:The Remarkable History of Scientific Theory|publisher=Modern Library|year=2004|isbn=0-679-64288-9
*cite book|last=Lovejoy|first=Arthur|authorlink=Arthur Oncken Lovejoy|title=The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea|publisher=Harvard University Press|year=1936|isbn=0-674-36153-9
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.