Conflict Continuum

Conflict Continuum

Cleanup|date=February 2008Original research|date=February 2008 The Conflict Continuum is a model developed by University of Chicago educator and theorist Andra Medea that seeks to explain how individuals, small groups, organizations, families, ethnicities, and even whole nations function when disputes arise between them. It posits that there are four types or levels of conflict, each operating by different, distinct rules: 1) "Problem Solving"; 2) "Domination"; 3) "Blind Behavior"; 4) "Rogue Messiah".

Every step from the first to the fourth is characterized by increasing degrees of separation from reality, and decreasing degrees of maturity (In this context, defined as the ability to control anger and settle differences without violence or destruction). Problem-solving behavior is based in reality and maturity, and is therefore more rational and mature than Domination. Domination is more rational and mature than Blind behavior, which is more rational and mature than the Rogue Messiah.

However, each level from fourth to first is more capable than the one below it at forcing victory in a conflict. ie: The Rogue Messiah overpowers Blind Behavior, Blind Behavior thwarts Domination, and Domination deadlocks Problem-solving.

Level One: Problem Solving

Adversaries at level one use negotiation, communication, brain-storming, or other collaborative skills to work toward equitable and/or mutually acceptable solutions. Facts are primary tools in making one's case. An attitude of flexibility prevails. Even when angered or upset, the parties to a dispute will try to exercise self-control and show a measure of respect for each other.

Level Two: Domination

Negotiation and listening skills become less effective, if not completely ineffective. One or both antagonists pursue their ends through power plays and psychological warfare to gain a position of superiority. They are rigid in holding to their views. Accusation (Belittling remarks, slurs, insults: "You stupid S.O.B..."), manipulation (flattery, false charm: "Trust me. Just trust me."), and whining/self pity ("You're so mean to me.") are characteristic fighting tactics. Violation of boundaries, withholding of facts, denial, and temper tantrums or other failures of self-control are characteristic behaviors. Conflicts handled this way can seem endless because they are never truly resolved, and are vulnerable to re-igniting.

Level Three: Blind Behavior

Levels One and Two make up the normal range of human interaction. Individuals (or groups or nations) readily shift back and forth between them as circumstances change. They tend to use Problem-Solving when they are feeling secure, shift to Domination when frustrated or threatened, and shift back to problem-solving when they feel safe again. At level three people can't return to Problem-Solving, although negotiating ability still minimally exists. They become increasingly mired in unmanageable problems, often of their own making, because they are blind to how their own actions contribute to their situation. Massive overkill of one's opponent(s), repetitively destructive vicious circles, exercise of power without checks and balances or other limits, sincere belief in one's own lies, rage seizures, and collapse of boundaries are among this level's defining elements. Tyranny and predation emerge here, as do all systems of abuse: Entrenched hatreds/blood feuds (eg: the Catholic - Protestant conflict in Northern Ireland, the Israeli - Palestinian conflict in the Middle East); Acute racism/sexism/religious hostility; Alcoholism/addictive disorders; Emotional abuse; Sexual abuse.

"Jekyll & Hyde" Effect

One of the more perverse characteristics of Level Three is the "Jekyll & Hyde" effect: tyrants/abusers have just enough contact with reality to maintain respectable appearances even as they grossly mistreat citizens, employees, or children. Because most outsiders do not perceive anything amiss, the first signs of trouble will show up in victims. Symptomatic behaviors include:
- Isolation: victims implicitly understand whatever they say about their abusers will not seem credible, and thus won't seek help even when potential help is in sight. This is also known as "the bell jar" effect, because it is as if abuse occurs in its own world behind a glass wall.
- Extreme reactions: victims will be remarkably apathetic about their ill treatment for long periods of time, and then abruptly lash out.
- Abnormal survival skills: victims withdraw or turn to rage, abasement, or gross compliance, most of which play into the hands of the abuser.

Level Four: Rouge Messiah

The Rouge Messiah is a leader of destructive proclivities and questionable sanity. As postulated by Medea, they are rare but uniquely dangerous to friends and foes alike. All start out as crackpots in search of a following. There are many potential candidates, most of whom fail. The career arc of those who succeed generally exhibits a pattern of rapid growth, accumulation, overreach, and sudden collapse. During the growth and accumulation phase they appear to be unstoppable, because opponents are almost always caught flat-footed by their methods and respond in ineffective ways. By the overreach phase RMs have built up a portfolio of atrocities --character assassination, murder, genocide, and even open warfare-- that causes outsiders to bring overwhelming force against them. The extra firepower at last brings about their defeat.

Personal Character

The personal character of RMs include most of the following traits:
- Grandiosity/Megalomania:They make no small plans; ambition runs to pursuing world wars and world conquest. They are also apt to give themselves bizarre titles. (eg: The full name Mobuto Sese Seko of Zaire gave himself was "Mobutu Sese Seko Nkuku Ngbendu wa Za Banga," which roughly translated meant "the all-powerful warrior who goes from conquest to conquest, leaving fire in his wake" [Michela Wrong, In the Footsteps of Mr. Kurtz: Living on the Brink of Disaster in Mobutu's Congo, p. 4] )
- Genius/insanity:To observers they seem interchangeably brilliant and insane. (eg: In 1937, Adolf Hitler's personal physician Dr. Ferdinand Sauerbruch assessed his patient to be on the boundary between the two. [ [http://www.fpp.co.uk/Hitler/docs/adjutants/SauerbruchInterrog.html Hitler's doctor foresaw world's 'craziest criminal'] ] )
- Sociopathy:They can't make normal distinctions between right and wrong. They either don't care or don't understand that the more outrageous their actions, the more they will invite reprisals. This inability to grasp cause and effect will come to infect followers as well.
- Paranoia
- Charisma

Manipulation Skills

The skills which help them gain influence and followers include:
- Creative opportunism: They will tap into whatever dispute is at hand, set themselves up as a leading authority, and build from there. If there are no political issues in contention they will make one up. If none of the available religions are sufficiently demagogic they will invent their own. (eg: Hitler emphasized Germany's grievances, Charles Manson tried to provoke a race war, and Osama bin Laden has selectively drawn from Islam in an effort to ignite a global holy war).
- Specialized media mastery:Their message will come across forcefully in some media forum or other, but not in all media. Once they've identified their strength they will specialize. (eg: Osama bin Laden has done well with videotaped communiques, but not live video. Hitler performed well at mass rallies and on radio. Joe McCarthy performed well on live TV).

Growth and Power

The qualities which facilitate their rapid growth and accumulation of power include:
- Intensive, sequential mode of attack:They move rapidly from battle to battle, feeding off each to launch them onto the next. By contrast, most people in a fight will act out for a period of time, then disengage and regroup. This disparity in style is what gives an RM his early appearance of invincibility.
- Eerie fortitude:They will not surrender. Nor will outside pressure diminish their influence over followers unless contact between them is broken.
- Inability to negotiate:They may engage in the process of negotiation, and may seemingly accept the terms of negotiated agreements, but the spirit of compromise is absent. By definition, they thrive on conflict and have no interest in resolving them. They will either move on to a different arena, or simply not following through. (eg: Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia in 1939 after signing the Munich Agreement in 1938. [J. A. S. Grenville, A History of the World from the 20th to the 21st Century (Routledge, 2005) p. 232] )
- Appropriation of resources:They vacuum up most or all of the available assets in their domain, which sometimes can be an entire country. Often they will claim to be acting on behalf of the poor or disadvantaged. In reality they target the middle and upper class because that is where the most wealth is concentrated.

Defeat

Factors contributing in their downfall include:
- Administrative incompetence:The intensity with which they lead others disguises their inability to manage day to day operations or solve logistical or technical problems. For that they are wholly dependent on more capable subordinates.
- Scorched earth tactics:They have neither anguish nor hesitation about sacrificing the lives of supporters. When opponents close in they will order the demolition of homes, industries, and even cities if any are under their control. (eg: in the closing months of WW II in Europe, Hitler ordered the destruction of all German industrial infrastructure. [Alan Bullock, A. Hitler: A Study in Tyranny (Penguin Books, 1962) p.59] David Koresh killed some federal agents and then burned down his own compound. [ [http://www.waco93.com/Danforth-finalreport.pdf Danforth, John (2000), Final report to the Deputy Attorney General concerning the 1993 confrontation at the Mt. Carmel Complex, Waco, Texas November 8, 2000 by John C. Danforth, Special Counsel] ] ) As relentlessly as they attack enemies, in essence they end up destroying their own side.

Addendum

Rogue Messiahs (or The Devil's Party) is also the title of a book by British author Colin Wilson exploring the lives and actions of cult leaders. It does not draw on nor does it reference the Conflict Continuum model, although most of the figures in it would fit the profile.

References

Andra Medea, Conflict Unraveled: Fixing Problems at Work and in Families (Pivot Point Press, 2004) pp.25-57

[http://www.chicagopublicradio.org/programs/worldview/conflict.asp WBEZ Worldview: The Conflict Continuum]

Footnotes

Other Books by Andra Medea

Going Home without Going Crazy: How to get along with your Parents and Family (New Harbinger Publications, 2005)

Against Rape (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1974)


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужна курсовая?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Conflict continuum — is a model or concept used by various social science researchers in modelling conflict, usually going from low irritations to high explosiveness intensity.[1] These conceptual models facilitate discussion as in anywhere on the conflict continuum …   Wikipedia

  • Conflict resolution research — Conflict resolution is any reduction in the severity of a conflict. It may involve conflict management, in which the parties continue the conflict but adopt less extreme tactics; settlement, in which they reach agreement on enough issues that the …   Wikipedia

  • Conflict resolution — Psychology …   Wikipedia

  • Conflict escalation — describes the escalation of a conflict to a more destructive, confrontational, painful, or otherwise less comfortable level; in particular, it is concerned with how persons or forces can be controlled or subdued in conflict. In systems theory,… …   Wikipedia

  • Continuum (role-playing game) — C°ntinuum roleplaying in The Yet C°ntinuum cover; illustrated by Mike Kaluta. Designer(s) Chris Adams, Dave Fooden, Barbara Manui Illustrator(s) …   Wikipedia

  • Peace process in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict — Part of a series on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict and Arab–Israeli conflict Israeli–Palestinian peace process …   Wikipedia

  • History of the Arab–Israeli conflict — The Arab Israeli conflict is a modern phenomenon, which takes its roots back in the end of the 19th century. The conflict became a major international issue with the birth of Israel in 1948. The Arab Israeli conflict has resulted in at least five …   Wikipedia

  • Bibliography of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict — This is an incomplete bibliography of the Israeli Palestinian conflict.General History* Bregman, Ahron (2002). Israel s Wars: A History Since 1947 . London: Routledge. ISBN 0 415 28716 2 *Bregman, Ahron Elusive Peace: How the Holy Land Defeated… …   Wikipedia

  • History of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict — The article discusses the history of the Israeli Palestinian conflict from the end of the nineteenth century to the present day. See also history of Jews and Arabs in the area for the history before the conflict. See also Israeli Palestinian… …   Wikipedia

  • Mitchell Report (Arab–Israeli conflict) — The Mitchell Report is a document that was created by an American fact finding committee, led by former US Senator George J. Mitchell, on the state of the Arab Israeli conflict, during the first stages of the al Aqsa Intifada. It was published on …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”