- Steve Blinkhorn
Dr. Stephen F. Blinkhorn (CPsychol, FBPsS) (born 1949) is a British occupational psychologist and
psychometrician (based inSt Albans , UK), who continues to contribute topsychology andpsychometric testing .Blinkhorn is known for about half-a-dozen or more landmark papers, many, but not all, of which have taken the form of book reviews for "Nature" magazine, including: "Willow, Titwillow, Titwillow" [Steve Blinkhorn, "Willow, titwillow, titwillow!",Nature 372, 417 - 419 (01 Dec 1994) Book Review] (a review of Herrnstein and Murray's "
The Bell Curve "); "What skulduggery?" [Blinkhorn, Steve (1982) [http://www.skepticfiles.org/evolut/mismeasr.htm "What Skulduggery?"] "NATURE 296". 506, 08 April 1982.] (a review ofStephen Jay Gould 's "The Mismeasure of Man "); and, more recently, "A gender bender", [Steve Blinkhorn (2005) [http://www.prd.co.uk/Docbank/naturearticles.tml "A Gender Bender"] , Nature, Vol 438, 3rd November 2005] (a critique on Paul Irwing andRichard Lynn 's paper onsex and intelligence ). Other papers have included speaking out about inappropriate use of theRasch model , [Goldstein H & Blinkhorn S.. (1977). "Monitoring Educational Standards: an inappropriate model.". Bull.Br.Psychol.Soc. 30 309-311] and the misuse ofpersonality tests [ Blinkhorn, S., Johnson, C., & Wood, R. (1988). "Spuriouser and spuriouser:The use of ipsative personality tests." Journal of Occupational. Psychology, 61, 153-162.] [Blinkhorn, S. & Johnson, C. (1990). "The insignificance of personality testing", Nature, 348 , 671-672.]Life and career
After attending grammar school, Blinkhorn attended St Edmund Hall, Oxford.
Academia
From 1973 to 1987, he developed and ran one of the first postgraduate studies in Occupational Psychology (in Britain) at what was then
Hatfield Polytechnic , now theUniversity of Hertfordshire . During this time, he also spent a year as a visiting professor in the neurological laboratory atStanford University , California (1981-1982).On his return from Stanford, Blinkhorn was approached by
nferNelson (NFER 's publishing arm) to design new ranges of tests for occupational selection. This led to the formation of the Psychometric Research Unit at Hatfield, which in turn was privatised by Dr. Blinkhorn in 1985.Psychology and psychometrics
Blinkhorn has been responsible for some of the most widely used ability and aptitude tests for recruitment and selection. [ASE] [OPP] He is also known as a critic of bad testing practice, in particular the abuse of
personality tests (see papers). At the age of 37, he became one of the then youngest fellows of the (British Psychological Society ), and has been a member of the BPS's Test Standards Committee, and served on the Society's Fellowships Committee. He is one of three 'consulting editors' for 'Selection and Development Review (SDR)' [ SDR, Vol 23. No.4, 2007. ISSN 0963-2638] (published by the BPS) alongside Prof. V. Dulewicz and Prof. N. Anderson.He was also a member of the panel formed by the BPS to investigate the
Polygraph and contributed a chapter to the book which resulted from the investigation. [Blinkhorn, S. (1988) "Lie Detection as a psychometric procedure" In "The Polygraph Test" (Gale, A. ed. 1988) 29-39]As an expert witness, he has acted on behalf of the
Commission for Racial Equality in several industrial tribunals. [(Jootley et al -v- British Railways Board which became known as the 'Paddington Guards' case] [ Amos et al -v- London Underground Ltd)]Among other things, he has worked with Harvey Goldstein (inappropriate implementation of the
Rasch model in education) (2 papers to reference), and was involved with the development ofNational Vocational Qualification s' [ WOOD, R., JOHNSON. C, BLINKHORN, S. & HALL, J. (1989) Boning, Blanching and Backtacking: Assessing Performance in the Workplace. Research and Development Series 46. Sheffield: Training Agency]Not forgetting Blinkhorn's chapter in '
Cyril Burt : Fraud or Framed?' [Cyril Burt: Fraud or Framed? Edited by N J. Mackintosh, pp 156. (OxfordUniversity Press 1995)] see review [ [http://www.galtoninstitute.org.uk/Newsletters/GINL9609/Burt_review.htm Cyril Burt: Fraud or Framed? ] ] and ' Was Burt stitched up?' in Nature magazine [ Steve Blinkhorn, 1989, Nature 340, 439 - 440 (10 Aug 1989) Book Review] .More recently followed by 'There's no-one quite like Grandad' [ [http://www.lms.ac.uk/newsletter/354/354_05.html Untitled Document ] ] (Blinkhorn's speech at theLighthill institute of mathematical sciences , Dec 2006) on newly rediscovered evidence which cast 'fresh light on early developments of mathematics applied to psychology' including references toCharles Spearman 's original work on general intelligence, and also to J.C. Maxwell Garnett, Cyril Burt, Godfrey Thomson, andLouis Thurstone .Nature articles
Since 1980, Blinkhorn has been writing for "Nature", starting with a book review of
Arthur Jensen 's 'Bias in Mental Testing. [ Blinkhorn, Steve (1980) 'Most orthodox heresy: Jensen on IQ myths',Nature 286, 743 - 744 (14 Aug 1980) Book Review ] Steve Blinkhorn has written a number of articles, a few of which have been on controversial issues, such as: Gender and IQ ('Gender Bender'), Vitamin Pills and IQ ('A dose of Vitamins and a Pinch of salt'), [Steve Blinkhorn, 'A dose of vitamins and a pinch of salt', Nature 350, 13 - 13 (07 Mar 1991) News and Views] Mice and IQ ('Mice and Mentality'). [Steve Blinkhorn, 2003 'Neuroscience: Mice and Mentality', Nature, Vol 424, 28 August,2003]Many of his articles have been 'book reviews' such as:'Willow Titwillow Titwillow!','What Skulduggery?',and 'Exponent of the exponential' [ Steve Blinkhorn, 2004,'Exponent of the exponential' Nature 429, 132 - 132 (13 May 2004) Books and Arts ] (Blinkhorn's review of 'The man who shocked the world: the life and legacy of
Stanley Milgram ' by Thomas Blass.).Other articles such as 'Yes, but what's it for?' [ Steve Blinkhorn, 2001, Nature, Vol 412, 23rd Aug 2001 ] equally make good reading, as Blinkhorn discusses how 'the current state of language' makes it difficult to discuss evolution accurately. In 2003, Blinkhorn was listed among Nature's 'magnificent seven' (writers commended for writing outstanding articles, illustrating 'the great job that scientists can do in communicating and commenting on new research') along with David Wark, Philip N Benfey, S.Blair Hedges, John Harte, Toren Finzel and Len A.Fisk. [ Nature 426, 773 - 773 (18 Dec 2003) News and Views ]
References
Categories
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.