Algiers Agreement (2000)

The Algiers Agreement was an agreement between the governments of Eritrea and Ethiopia signed on December 12, 2000, at Algiers, Algeria to end the Eritrean-Ethiopian War, a border war fought by the two countries from 1998 to 2000. ("See also: History of Eritrea.")

The purpose of the agreement was to:

* end/terminate hostilities permanently and agree to refrain from the threat or use of force.
* respect and fully implement the provisions of an agreement on cessation of hostilities signed on June 18, 2000.
* release and repatriate all prisoners of war and all other persons detained.
* provide humane treatment to each other's nationals and persons of each other's national origin within their respective territories.

The Agreement established two neutral commissions: the Boundary Commission, and the Claims Commission.

Each commission was composed of five members and located in The Hague, the Netherlands. Each country was to appoint two commissioners who were not nationals of the country. The president of each commission was selected by the other commissioners. Provision was made that if they failed to agree on a president within 30 days, the Secretary-General of the United Nations would appoint a president after consultation with the parties.

Boundary Commission

The two governments agreed to determine the origins of the conflict by allowing an investigation incidents of 1997 and 1998 and earlier regarding their common border. The investigation would be carried out by an independent, impartial body, known as the Ethiopian-Eritrean Boundary Commission (EEBC), appointed by the Secretary General of the Organization of African Unity (OAU), in consultation with the Secretary General of the United Nations and the two parties.

The two governments reaffirmed the principle of respect for the borders existing at independence, and that the border was to be determined on the basis of colonial treaties and applicable international law by the Boundary Commission. The United Nations Cartographer would serve as Secretary to the Commission, and undertake such tasks as assigned to him by the Commission, making use of the technical expertise of the UN Cartographic Unit.

Each party provided its claims and evidence to the Secretary, who provided to the Commission his findings based on this evidence, identifying those portions of the border where there appeared to be no dispute between the parties. Where there was disagreement, the parties presented written and oral submissions and any additional evidence directly to the Commission.

Upon reaching a final decision regarding delimitation of the borders, the Commission transmitted its decision to the parties and Secretaries General of the OAU and the UN, and the Commission was to arrange for demarcation. The parties agreed that the delimitation and demarcation determinations of the Commission would be final and binding. Each party agreed to respect the border so determined, as well as the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the other party.

The Commission issued a final border ruling in 2003, but its decision was rejected by Ethiopia. As of August 2004, the border question remained in dispute, although a tentative peace remains in place. By November 2007 the EEBC concluded the demarcation phase of the Algiers Agreement [cite press release | title = Press Release: 2007-11-30 | publisher = Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission | date = 2007-11-30 | url = http://www.pca-cpa.org/upload/files/Press%20Release%202007-11-30.pdf | accessdate = 2007-12-14 ] As of that date, Ethiopia has not withdrawn its troops from those positions on the Eritrean side of the demarcated border.Fact|date=December 2007

However, as of September 2007, Ethiopia considers Eritrea to be in breach of the agreement,cite news|url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7013529.stm|title = Ethiopia sends warning to Eritrea|publisher = BBC News|first= Elizabeth |last= Blunt|date= 2007-09-25|accessdate=2007-09-26] which effectively puts any border issues in contention. In December 2007, an estimated 4000 Eritrean troops remained in the 'demilitarized zone' with a further 120,000 along its side of the border. Ethiopia maintained 100,000 troops along its side. [ [http://economist.com/world/africa/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10286359 "Ethiopia and Eritrea: Bad words over Badme"] , ""The Economist] ", 13 December 2007]

Claims Commission

A neutral Claims Commission was also established. The mandate of the Commission was to decide through binding arbitration all claims for loss, damage or injury by one Government against the other, and by nationals of one party against the Government of the other party or entities owned or controlled by the other party that were (a) related to the conflict, and (b) resulted from violations of international humanitarian law, including the 1949 Geneva Conventions, or other violations of international law.

The Commission would not hear claims arising from the cost of military operations, preparing for military operations, or the use of force, except to the extent that such claims involve violations of international humanitarian law.

Claims were submitted to the Commission by each of the parties on its own behalf and on behalf of its nationals within one year from the effective date of the agreement, and with certain exceptions, the Commission was to be the only forum for such claims. In appropriate cases, the parties could file claims on behalf of persons of Eritreans or Ethiopian origin who were not nationals.

The Commission was authorized to develop its own methods of efficient case management and mass claims processing. The Commission was to endeavor to complete its work within three years of the date when the period for filing claims closes. The Commission was to apply relevant rules of international law.

Decisions and awards of the Commission were final and binding. The parties agreed to honour all decisions and to pay any monetary awards rendered against them promptly.

ee also

Notes