Guantanamo captives' appeals in Washington DC Courts

Guantanamo captives' appeals in Washington DC Courts

Guantananmo detainees have been allowed to initiate appeals in Washington DC Courts since the passage of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (DTA).The closed off the right of Guantanamo detainees to submit new petitions of habeas corpus. It substituted a right to a limited appeal to Federal Courts of appeal in Washington DC.cite news
url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/21/AR2007122101392.html
title=Detainee Evidence Probe Weighed: Judge Told Guantanamo Information May Have Been Destroyed
pages=Page A02
publisher=Washington Post
author=Carol D. Leonnig
date=Saturday, December 22, 2007
accessdate=2008-01-06
] The Act allowed detainees to challenge whether their Combatant Status Review Tribunals had correctly followed the rules laid out by the Department of Defense.

After the passage of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 (MCA) closed down the pending habeas corpus cases.Attorneys for the detainees initiated both a challenge to the constitutionality of the MCA's stripping of the right to habeas corpus; and they started initiating the appeals in the DC Federal Courts of appeal allowed by the DTA.

June 2008 rulings

On June 12 2008, in Boumediene v. Bush, the United States Supreme Court ruled the Combatant Status Review Tribunals provided the detainees with insufficient protection, and re-opened the dtainees' access to file habeas corpus.

On 23 June 2008 a three judge panel reviewed the evidence used to justify Parhat's designation as an "enemy combatant" and ruled that he had never been an enemy combatant after all.cite news
url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/23/AR2008062300844.html
title=Appeals court rules for Guantanamo prisoner
publisher=Washington Post
author=James Vicini
date=June 23 2008
accessdate=2008-06-23
quote=
[http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fwp-dyn%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F2008%2F06%2F23%2FAR2008062300844.html&date=2008-06-23 mirror] ] cite news
url=http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/41907.html
title=In first, court rejects military's ruling in Guantanamo case
publisher=McClatchy News Service
date=June 23 2008
accessdate=2008-06-23
quote=
] cite news
url=http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/06/23/america/NA-GEN-US-Guantanamo-Chinese-Muslim.php
title=US appeals court rejects classification of Chinese Muslim as an enemy combatant
publisher=International Herald Tribune
date=June 23 2008
accessdate=2008-06-23
quote=
] cite news
url=http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/30/snark-injection-for-guantanamo-trial/?hp
title=Snark Injection for Guantanamo Trial
publisher=New York Times
author=Mike Nizza
date=2008-06-30
accessdate=2008-06-30
quote=
] cite news
url=http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/200806/06-1397-1124487.pdf
title=Huzaifa Parhat v. Gates
publisher=United States Department of Justice
author=Merrick B. Garland
date=2008-06-30
accessdate=2008-06-30
quote=
] cite news
url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/01/washington/01gitmo.html?hp
title=Court Is Skeptical of U.S. Evidence in Guantánamo Case
publisher=New York Times
author=William Glaberson
date=2008-06-30
accessdate=2008-06-30
quote=
]

Bush Presidency response

On July 21 2008 United States Attorney General Michael Mukasey called on the Congress to pass legislation controlling how judges would review the detainees' habeas petitions.cite news
url=http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN2140857120080721
title=Bush law chief seeks war declaration on al Qaeda
publisher=Reuters
author=
date=2008-07-21
accessdate=2008-07-21
quote=
[http://www.webcitation.org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Farticle%2FpoliticsNews%2FidUSN2140857120080721%3Fsp%3Dtrue&date=2008-07-21 mirror] ] cite news
url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/22/washington/22justice.html?_r=1&hp=&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1216667611-VUzbXoMuUhzCHuHUYeD0GQ
title=Administration Calls for Action on Detainees
publisher=New York Times
author=Eric Lichtblau
date=2208-07-22
accessdate=2008-07-21
quote=
] cite news
url=http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/presidentbush/2008/07/guantanamo-muka.html
title=In key Gitmo case, Mukasey stays on White House path
publisher=Los Angeles Times
author=James Gerstenzang
date=2008-07-21
accessdate=2008-07-21
quote=
] Mukasey was seeking to have the legislation control what evidence should be made public, and to proscribe releasing any of the detainees within the USA.

Detainees who are filing appeals in Federal Court

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Guantanamo detainees' appeals in Washington DC Courts — Guantananmo detainees have been allowed to initiate appeals in Washington DC Courts since the passage of the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (DTA) closed off the right of Guantanamo captives to submit new petitions of habeas corpus. It substituted …   Wikipedia

  • Guantanamo Bay detention camp — The Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp is a controversial [ [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3754238.stm Guantanamo controversy rumbles on] ] United States detention center operated by Joint Task Force Guantanamo since 2002 in Guantanamo Bay …   Wikipedia

  • Uyghur detainees at Guantanamo Bay — The United States government detained twenty two Uyghurs in the Guantanamo Bay detainment camp since 2002. As of today the five Uyghurs Abdul Razakah, Yusef Abbas, Hajiakbar Abdulghupur, Saidullah Khalik and Ahmed Mohamed remain in Guantanamo and …   Wikipedia

  • Kiyemba v. Bush — (Civil Action No. 05 cv 01509) is a petition for habeas corpus filed on behalf of Jamal Kiyemba, a Ugandan citizen formerly held in extrajudicial detention in the United States Guantanamo Bay detention camps, in Cuba.[1] Mr. Kiyemba is the next… …   Wikipedia

  • Detainee Treatment Act — The Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (DTA) is an Act of the United States Congress that prohibits inhumane treatment of prisoners, including prisoners at Guantanamo Bay; requires military interrogations to be performed according to the U.S. Army… …   Wikipedia

  • Habeas corpus petitions of Guantanamo Bay detainees — Contents 1 The Supreme Court rules on Rasul v. Bush 2 Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 3 The Supreme Court rules on Hamdi v. Rumsfeld 4 …   Wikipedia

  • Majid Khan (Guantanamo captive 10020) — There are multiple individuals named Majid Khan. Majid Khan is a Pakistan born man and legal resident of the United States who immigrated to the US in 1996. On a trip to Pakistan to visit his wife, Khan was detained by Pakistani officials and… …   Wikipedia

  • Uyghur captives in Guantanamo — The United States government has held twenty two Uyghurs in Guantanamo Bay detainment camp. Eighteen of the detainees were present at Combatant Status Review Tribunals (CSRTs) conducted by the U.S. military to review their cases.Uyghurs are an… …   Wikipedia

  • Majid Khan (detainee) — Majid Khan Arrested early 2003 Pakistan Citizenship Pakistan Detained at Pakistan, CIA black sites, Guantanamo ISN 10020 Charge(s) No charge …   Wikipedia

  • Hamdan v. Rumsfeld — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Hamdan v. Rumsfeld ArgueDate=March 28 ArgueYear=2006 DecideDate=June 29 DecideYear=2006 FullName=Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Petitioner v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, United States Secretary of Defense; John D. Altenburg, Jr., Appointing… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”