- Counterargument
-
In reasoning and argument mapping, a counterargument, also known as a rebuttal, is an objection to an objection. A counterargument can be used to rebut an objection to a premise, a main contention or a lemma. Other synonyms for such opposing reasons are counter-reasons or concessions.[1]
A counterargument might seek to cast doubt on facts of one or more of the first argument's premises, or to show that the first argument's contention does not follow from its premises in a valid manner, or the counterargument might pay little attention to the premises and common structure of the first argument and simply attempt to demonstrate the truth of a conclusion incompatible with that of the first argument.
Contents
Writing
To speak of counterarguments is not to assume that there are only two sides to a given issue nor that there is only one types of counter-argument.[1]
Table: Parsing multiple counter-arguments[1] Counterargument 1 Counterargument 2 Counterargument 3 . . . Support Statement Type Support Statement Type Support Statement Type . . . . . . Response 1 Response 2 Response 3 . . . For a given argument, there is often a large number of counterarguments, some of which are not compatible with each other.
Speech
In a debate or in a speaking context, a counter-argument can be handled in a variety of ways.[2]
Responding to a counterargument does not mean utterly obliterating it. You may concede it, minimize it, dismiss it as irrelevant, or attack the supporting evidence or underlying premise. Even if you grant the existence of a problem, you can differ from your audience on the best solution.[2]Counterexample
The attempt to rebut an argument may involve generating a counter-argument or finding a counter-example.[3]
See also
- Rebuttal, for the legal concept
- Inference objection
Notes
- ^ a b c Zwiers, Jeff. (2008). Developing Academic Thinking Skills in Grades 6-12, p. 111. at Google Books
- ^ a b Sprague, Jo et al. (2008). The Speaker's Handbook, p. 326. at Google Books
- ^ Rahwan, Iyad et al. (2009). Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, p. 186. at Google Books
References
- Rahwan, Iyad and Pavlos Moraitis. (2009). Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. Berlin: Springer. 10-ISBN 3642002064/13-ISBN 9783642002069; OCLC 496892202
- Sprague, Jo and Douglas Stuart. (2008). The Speaker's Handbook. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 10-ISBN 0155831755/13-ISBN 9780155831759; OCLC 10795362
- Zwiers, Jeff. (2004). Developing Academic Thinking Skills in Grades 6-12: a Handbook of Multiple Intelligence Activities. Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association. 10-ISBN 0872075575/13-ISBN 9780872075573; OCLC 300267606
External links
- Harvard, counter-argument
This logic-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.