Comparison of usability evaluation methods

Comparison of usability evaluation methods
Evaluation Method Evaluation Method Type Applicable Stages Description Advantages Disadvantages
Think aloud protocol Testing Design, coding, testing and release of application Participants in testing express their thoughts on the application while executing set tasks
  • Less expensive
  • Results are close to what is experienced by users
  • The Environment is not natural to the user
Remote testing Testing Design, coding, testing and release of application The experimenter does not directly observe the users while they use the application
  • Efficiency, effectiveness and satisfaction, the three usability issues, are covered
  • Additional Software is necessary to observe the participants from a distance
Focus groups Inquiry Testing and release of application A moderator guides a discussion with a group of users of the application
  • If done before prototypes are developed, can save money
  • Produces a lot of useful ideas from the users themselves
  • Can improve customer relations
  • The environment is not natural to the user and may provide inaccurate results.
  • The data collected tends to have low validity due to the unstructured nature of the discussion
Interviews Inquiry Design, coding, testing and release of application The users are interviewed to find out about their experience and expectations
  • Good at obtaining detailed information
  • Few participants are needed
  • Can improve customer relations
  • Can not be conducted remotely
  • Does not address the usability issue of efficiency
Cognitive walkthrough Inspection Design, coding, testing and release of application A team of evaluators walk through the application discussing usability issues through the use of a paper prototype or a working prototype
  • Good at refining requirements
  • does not require a fully functional prototype
  • Does not address user satisfaction or efficiency
  • The designer may not behave as the average user when using the application
Pluralistic walkthrough Inspection Design A team of users, usability engineers and product developers review the usability of the paper prototype of the application
  • Usability issues are resolved faster
  • Greater number of usability problems can be found at one time
  • Does not address the usability issue of efficiency

Source: Genise, Pauline. “Usability Evaluation: Methods and Techniques: Version 2.0” August 28, 2002. University of Texas.

See also


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно сделать НИР?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Usability — is a term used to denote the ease with which people can employ a particular tool or other human made object in order to achieve a particular goal. Usability can also refer to the methods of measuring usability and the study of the principles… …   Wikipedia

  • Usability inspection — is the name for a set of methods where an evaluator inspects a user interface. This is in contrast to usability testing where the usability of the interface is evaluated by testing it on real users. Usability inspections can generally be used… …   Wikipedia

  • Comparison of audio synthesis environments — Software audio synthesis environments typically consist of an audio programming language (which may be graphical) and a user environment to design/run the language in. Although many of these environments are comparable in their abilities to… …   Wikipedia

  • Comparison of C Sharp and Visual Basic .NET — The correct title of this article is Comparison of C# and Visual Basic .NET. The substitution or omission of the # sign is because of technical restrictions. Programming language comparisons General comparison Basic syntax Basic instructions …   Wikipedia

  • Component-based usability testing — (CBUT) is a testing approach which aims at empirically testing the usability of an interaction component. The latter is defined as an elementary unit of an interactive system, on which behaviour based evaluation is possible. For this, a component …   Wikipedia

  • Cognitive walkthrough — The cognitive walkthrough method is a usability inspection method used to identify usability issues in a piece of software or web site, focusing on how easy it is for new users to accomplish tasks with the system. Whereas cognitive walkthrough is …   Wikipedia

  • Pluralistic walkthrough — The Pluralistic Walkthrough (also called a Participatory Design Review, User Centered Walkthrough, Storyboarding, Table Topping, or Group Walkthrough) is a usability inspection method used to identify usability issues in a piece of software or… …   Wikipedia

  • Focus group — Marketing Key concepts Product marketing · Pricing …   Wikipedia

  • Think aloud protocol — is a method used to gather data in usability testing in product design and development, in psychology and a range of social sciences. The think aloud method was developed by Clayton Lewis while he was at IBM, and is explained in C. Lewis and J.… …   Wikipedia

  • Human factors — For other uses, see The Human Factor (disambiguation). Research subject in a human fatigue study. Human factors science or human factors technologies is a multidisciplinary field incorporating contributions from psychology, engineering,… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”