Euenantiornithes

Taxobox
name = Euenantiornithes
status = fossil
fossil_range = Early - Late Cretaceous


image_width = 240px
image_caption = "Eoenantiornis buhleri"
regnum = Animalia
phylum = Chordata
classis = Aves
subclassis = Enantiornithes
superordo = Euenantiornithes
superordo_authority = Chiappe, 2002
subdivision_ranks = Orders
subdivision =
Aberratiodontuiformes (disputed)

Alexornithiformes
"Cathayornithiformes" (disputed)

Enantiornithiformes
Gobipterygiformes (disputed)
and see text

Euenantiornithes was a superorder of Cretaceous birds. They are considered to contain the more advanced taxa of the Enantiornithes, the dominant group of birds during the late Mesozoic. Other, more plesiomorphic Enantiornithes such as "Iberomesornis romerali" or "Noguerornis gonzalezi", are not considered to belong herein, but altogether, the Euenantiornithes appear to contain the bulk of the Enantiornithes.

Despite being in accordance with phylogenetic nomenclature, the Euenantiornithes have come under severe criticism by proponents of that taxonomical system, such as Paul Sereno, who called them

"a ["sic"] ill-defined clade [...] a good example of a poor choice in a phylogenetic definition" [Sereno (2005)]

As they are technically validly described as a clade but might be a phenetic evolutionary grade instead, they could be considered a test case for how the proposed PhyloCode would deal with "nomina dubia".

ystematics and taxonomy

Several taxa have been established at order rank in this group. Many contain only the type species and most are "incertae sedis" regarding their interrelationships. They are consequently dismissed by many authorities. Apart from that, the placement of the following taxa is even less resolved:

Basal Euenantiornithes
*"Eoalulavis" (Early Cretaceous)Euenantiornithes "incertae sedis"
*"Boluochia" (Early Cretaceous) - cathayornithid?
*"Concornis" (Early Cretaceous) - cathayornithid? enantiornithiform?
*"Cuspirostrisornis" (Early Cretaceous)
*Enantiornithes gen. et sp. indet. CAGS-IG-04-CM-007 (Xiagou Early Cretaceous of Mazongshan, PRC) [Lamanna "et al." (2006)]
*"Eoenantiornis" (Early Cretaceous)
*"Largirostrornis" (Early Cretaceous)
*"Longchengornis" (Early Cretaceous)
*"Longirostravis" (Early Cretaceous)
*"Hebeiornis" (Early Cretaceous) - possibly a "nomen nudum"; if valid, includes "Vescornis"
*Enantiornithes gen. et sp. indet. RBCM.EH2005.003.0002 (Northumberland Late Cretaceous of Hornby Island, Canada) [Morrison "et al." (2005)]
*"Gurilynia" (Late Cretaceous) - enantiornithiform?
*"Halimornis" (Late Cretaceous)
*"Lectavis" (Late Cretaceous) - enantiornithiform?
*"Lenesornis" (Late Cretaceous)
*"Neuquenornis" (Late Cretaceous) - cathayornithid? avisaurid?
*"Yungavolucris" (Late Cretaceous) - enantiornithiform?Family Kuszholiidae (disputed)
*"Kuszholia" (Late Cretaceous)Order Aberratiodontuiformes (disputed)
* Family Aberratiodontuidae
**"Aberratiodontus" (Early Cretaceous)Order "Cathayornithiformes" (disputed)
* Family "Cathyornithidae"
**"Sinornis/Cathayornis" (Early Cretaceous) - which name is correct is disputed
**"Eocathayornis" (Early Cretaceous)Order Alexornithiformes (disputed)
* Family Alexornithidae
**"Alexornis" (Late Cretaceous)
**"Kizylkumavis" (Late Cretaceous)
**"Sazavis" (Late Cretaceous)Order Gobipterygiformes (disputed)
*Family Gobipterygidae
**"Gobipteryx" (Late Cretaceous)Order Enantiornithiformes
* Family Enantiornithidae (disputed)
**"Enantiornis" (Late Cretaceous)
* Family Avisauridae
**"Avisaurus" (Late Cretaceous)
**"Soroavisaurus" (Late Cretaceous)

Doubtful Euenantiornithes
It is not clear whether these taxa are Euenantiornithes:
*Enantiornithes gen. et sp. indet. MZ unnumbered (Adamantina Late Cretaceous of Presidente Prudente, Brazil) - enantiornithiform?
*Enantiornithes gen. et sp. indet. Patrick Mechin collection 606 (Late Cretaceous of Bastide-Neuve, France) - alexornithid? [Buffetaut "et al." (2000)]

For these birds, it is not even fully resolved that they were Enantiornithes, but they show some characters usually found in Euenantiornithes:
* "Longipteryx" (Early Cretaceous) - own order?
* "Nanantius" (Early -? Late Cretaceous) - enantiornithiform?
* "Abavornis" (Late Cretaceous)
* "Explorornis" (Late Cretaceous)
* "Horezmavis" (Late Cretaceous of Kyzyl Kum, Uzbekistan) - gobipterygiform?
* "Incolornis" (Late Cretaceous)
* Family Zhyraornithidae - enantiornithiform?
**"Zhyraornis" (Late Cretaceous)"Jibeinia" (Early Cretaceous) is a "nomen dubium".

Footnotes

References

* (2000): An archaic bird (Enantiornithes) from the Upper Cretaceous of Provence (southern France). "C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris IIA - Sciences de la Terre et des planètes" 331(8): 557–561. DOI|10.1016/S1251-8050(00)01451-8 (HTML abstract)
* (2006): A partial skeleton of an enantiornithine bird from the Early Cretaceous of northwestern China. "Acta Palaeontologica Polonica" 51(3): 423–434. [http://www.app.pan.pl/acta51/app51-423.pdf PDF fulltext]
* (2005): Cretaceous fossil birds from Hornby Island (British Columbia). "Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences" 42(12): 2097–2101. [http://pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/cgi-bin/rp/rp2_abst_e?cjes_e05-081_42_ns_nf_cjes HTML abstract]
* (2005): " [http://www.taxonsearch.org/dev/file_home.php TaxonSearch: Stem Archosauria] ". Version 1.0, 2005-NOV- 7. Retrieved 2006-OCT-02.