- Kreisky-Peter-Wiesenthal affair
The Kreisky-Peter-Wiesenthal affair was a political and personal feud in the 1970s fought between the then Austrian chancellor
Bruno Kreisky and theNazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal arising from Kreisky's ministerial appointments and theSS past ofFreedom Party leaderFriedrich Peter , which had been revealed by Wiesenthal.Political Development in Austria in the 1970s
Bruno Kreisky's socialist party had been ruling
Austria since 1970, with an absolute majority since the 1971 general election. In 1975, their re-election was quite unsure, so Kreisky secretly struck a deal with the right-wing Freedom Party´s leader Friedrich Peter on building a government together if the socialists failed to achieve an absolute majority of seats in theNational Council . This however, proved unnecessary, when Kreisky's party managed to maintain its majority. Simon Wiesenthal, by contrast, was a well-known supporter of the conservativeAustrian People's Party .Wiesenthal's accusations
When Kreisky, a Jew who had spent all of World War 2 in Sweden, formed his
minority government after a close victory in the 1970 election. Wiesenthal soon pointed out that five of his appointed ministers had a Nazi past, one of them, Minister for the InteriorOtto Rösch , even forneo-Nazi activities after the war. Kreisky however, publicly defended his appointments claiming that because of his own past as refugee and political prisoner he could very well forgive former Nazis, if they were democrats now. Wiesenthal, on the contrary, stated that "the Nazis could live, the Nazis could die, but they should not govern us"".Alan Levy: Nazi Hunter: The Wiesenthal File. London, 2002] . In1975 , Wiesenthal had done some research about Kreisky's would-be coalition partner, and showed his report to presidentRudolf Kirchschläger , who urged him not to publish it before the election, because the Austrian people would see this as a foreign interference in their democracy. Wiesenthal agreed. Two weeks after the election, however, Wiesenthal revealed what he had found out about Peter's wartime years. His report showed that Peter had been an officer in theSS and had served asObersturmführer at Infantry regiment 10 of the 1. SS infantry brigade. This unit was part of theEinsatzgruppen , which shot hundreds of thousands of Jews in Nazi-occupied Eastern Europe in1941 . Peter, who never denied having been a member of the SS, however said that he didn't take part in any mass killings, claiming he was not on duty during the massacres.Kreisky attacking Wiesenthal
Bruno Kreisky, never a very diplomatic character, not only fully supported Peter politically, but went on to attack Wiesenthal instead. On a party conference, his secretary
Leopold Gratz started the attack claiming that Wiesenthal was operating a "secret police and surveillance center" [http://www.simon-wiesenthal-archiv.at/01_wiesenthal/06_stimmen/01_wechsberg.html Stimmen zu Wiesenthal] ] and was in no way allowed to defame democratically elected politicians. Kreisky later on said that Wiesenthal was "makes a living telling the world that Austria is anti-Semitic. What else can he do?" He went on to call Wiesenthal a formerGestapo agent, based onCzechoslovakia n intelligence papers which turned out to be fakes years later and wanted a parliamentary investigation of Wiesenthal'sJewish Documentary Center inVienna .It became a fierce battle between Austria's two most famous living Jews about Austria's dealing with its Nazi past, about supporting
Israel and about Jewish identity in Austria after the war. It climaxed in Kreisky arguing that he "was no longer Jewish" and Wiesenthal's response that "the only Austrian, who does not believe Kreisky is Jewish is Kreisky himself".Alan Levy: Nazi Hunter: The Wiesenthal File. London, 2002] In an interview with a Dutch journalist, the chancellor even stated that "the Jews are no people, and if they´re, they´re a lousy people". Kreisky andHeinz Fischer , now president of Austria, even considered a parliamentary inquiry on Wiesenthal and his center. Before the Austrian presidential elections in2002 , Fischer publicly apologized for his behavior in that context.Background
Unlike Wiesenthal, who had spent years in Nazi
concentration camps and had lost most of his family there, Kreisky felt that he had never personally suffered as a Jew, but only as asocialist . Historians believe that Kreisky's forgiveness and relaxed attitude towards former Nazis dates from his time in the prisons of the AustrianDollfuss regime in 1935. Many of his cellmates were Nazis and he accepted them as fellow political opponents of the Austro-Fascist government. It was one of these former cellmates who arranged Kreisky's escape toSweden in1938 .Another factor was that Kreisky was an assimilated Jew from Vienna, who did not practise his faith and had nothing to do with the mostly very poor Eastern Jews that were considered inferior and embarrassing even by most of the Austrian Jews. "The eastern Jews are alienated from normal ways of thinking" Kreisky actually remarked. This was, however, exactly Wiesenthal's background: He was born in Galicia and raised in a very religious way. He felt that being Jewish was more than a religious faith, for him it was a shared fate. Both men, however, never spoke to each other again and both felt that they were right about their view about each other.References
External links
* [http://www.simon-wiesenthal-archiv.at The Simon Wiesenthal Archive in Vienna (German)]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.