Bill S-220 An Act to Protect Heritage Lighthouses

Bill S-220 An Act to Protect Heritage Lighthouses

An Act To Protect Heritage Lighthouses, officially known as Bill S-215, is a federal act to designate and preserve historically significant Canadian lighthouses. It was passed by the Canadian Parliament in May 2008. The bill will designate heritage lighthouses using public consultation and require public consultation before alterations, sale or proposed demolition. It will also require that designated lighthouses be maintained to heritage building conservation standards. First introduced in 2000 as Bill S-21 in the Senate of Canada the bill has enjoyed consistent multi-party support despite the unpredictable legislative agendas of minority Parliaments to be repeatedly re-introduced. It was one vote away from becoming law in the Canadian House of Commons in the fall of 2007. After Parliament was prorogued, the bill was re-introduced in the Senate as Bill S-215 where it quickly passed and was forwarded to the House of Commons where after minor amendment it passed Third Reading in early May 2008. The final vote of approval was made the the Canadian Senate on May 8 and the bill received Royal Assent on May 29, 2008. The Act will come into effect in two years.

Origins

With the world's largest coastline, Canada built a large network of lighthouses and developed a unique Canadian style of lighthouses following Confederation in 1867. Advances in navigational technology have lessened the critical navigational role of lighthouses while at the same time their cultural role and potential for tourism development has grown. Lighthouse groups seeking to preserve lighthouses soon found that in Canada, the landmark buildings fell into a heritage Catch-22. As federal buildings, they are exempt from municipal or provincial laws, but they are not protected by any federal heritage laws. Lighthouses are instead merely subject to a property management program called the Federal Heritage Building Review Office (FHBRO). A survey of lighthouses across Canada in 1998 by the Nova Scotia Lighthouse Preservation Society showed that less than 4 per cent of Canadian lighthouses have been protected from demolition under FHBRO, while in the United States, 70 percent of lighthouses over 50 years old have heritage protection by the National Register of Historic Places. The FHBRO process has also been criticized for lack of public consultation with most communities having no idea when local lighthouses were evaluated and for the fact that when lighthouses are sold privately or transferred to other levels of government, even the minimal FHBRO protection evaporates. [CANADA NEEDS A LIGHTHOUSE PROTECTION ACT http://www.nslps.com/r&p_lighthouse_protection_act.asp]

This lack of protection for heritage lighthouses was first felt in Nova Scotia, the Canadian province with the largest number of lighthouses. So many were facing demolition and neglect, that a campaign for federal legislation to protect lighthouses was launched by the Nova Scotia Lighthouse Preservation Society at the Chebucto Head lighthouse near Halifax in March 11, 1999 [Graeme Hamilton "Lighthouse Yard Sale Coming, Group Fears" National Post March 12, 1999] . A committee of the society soon networked with other lighthouse groups in Atlantic Canada, Quebec, Ontario and British Columbia, organizing a letter campaign to the Canadian Heritage Minister and every Member of Parliament and Senator to ask for legistation creating a "Lighthouse Protection Act". [Chris Mills 'Saving Our Lights' "Heritage: The Magazine of the Heritage Canada Foundation" Autumn 1999, page 9.] Many politicians responded positively but the leadership for the bill emerged from a fitting East Coast/West Coast partnership of two Canadian Senators, Mike Forrestall from Nova Scotia and Pat Carney from British Columbia. Forrestall first introduced the Bill in 2000, noting that lighthouses were neglected national symbols, "The government was hell-bent on tearing them down or abandoning them." [Pamela Cook "Sending an SOS for Canada's Lighthouses" "Capital News Online" November 14, 2003 http://www.carleton.ca/jmc/cnews/14112003/n3.shtml ]

Content

The bill is modeled on the successful Heritage Railway Stations Protection Act passed by Parliament in 1988 which has proven a success in preserving railway heritage buildings. [Parks Canada State of Protected Areas http://www.pc.gc.ca/docs/pc/rpts/etat-state-2001/sec6/histor6_E.asp]

Designation

Under the bill the Minister responsible for the Parks Canada Agency would set criteria to designate a heritage lighthouse. Individual lighthouses would be considered for designation when nominated by a petition of at least 25 Canadians within two years of the act coming into force. The Minister would establish an advisory committee to assist in evaluating applications before deciding which lighthouses would be designated. Designation must occur within five years of the act coming into force when a list of the lights considered and those that have been designated would be published in the Canada Gazette.

Protection

Renovations at a designated lighthouse must meet heritage building criteria established by the minister based on national and international standards for the conservation of heritage properties. An exception is made for renovations in emergency circumstance or for urgent operational requirements for the lighthouse's navigational role.The heritage character of the lighthouse must still be protected even if a lighthouse is sold or transferred to another level of government. A heritage lighthouse my not be demolished unless "there is no reasonable alternative". An exception is made for demolitions in emergency circumstance or for urgent operational requirements. Both the sale and demolition of a designated lighthouse would require public consultation. Designated heritage lighthouses must be maintained to standards established by the minister keeping with national and international standards for the conservation of heritage properties. [ [http://www2.parl.gc.ca/content/Senate/Bills/391/public/S-220/S-220_3/S-220_text-e.htm Bill s-220, Text of Bill ] ]

Bill S-220 is not a money bill mandating additional spending but is a process bill establishing new procedures. The procedures and criteria to designate and maintain a heritage lighthouse as well as it advisory committee are expected to be drawn from existing criteria and procedures used by the Canadian Historic Sites and Monuments Board in administering the Heritage Railway Stations Protection Act [ [http://www.pc.gc.ca/clmhc-hsmbc/gfp-hrs/gfp-hrs1b_E.asp Historic Sites and Monuments Board of Canada - Heritage Railway Stations - Recognizing and Protecting the Hertiage [sic] Character ] ]

History of the Bill in Parliament

An Act To Protect Heritage Lighthouses was first introduced by the late Senator Mike Forrestall of Nova Scotia as a Private Member's Bill (S-21) in 2000. It was brought it forward three more times, as S-7 , then as S-14, then as S-41 which was given Third Reading by the Senate on March 23, 2005. The House of Commons debated the bill in June 2005 in Second Reading and referred it to the Standing Committee on the Environment and Sustainable Development for clause-by-clause review. The bill died on the Order Paper when the federal election of January 2006 was called. Following the death of Senator Forrestall in June 2006, the bill was re-introduced as Bill-S220 in October 2006 by Senator Pat Carney of British Columbia. The Bill was given Third Reading and passed by the Senate on December 14, 2006. The bill was first sponsored in the House of Commons by Conservative Member of Parliament Gerald Keddy. It passed Second Reading on June 13, 2007 and was scheduled to be reviewed by the House of Commons Fisheries Committee in October 2007 before Third and Final Reading. However, the announcement on September 4 that Parliament would be prorogued in October put the bill back to the Senate where on October 30 Pat Carney re-introduced it as Bill S-215. [ [http://www.parl.gc.ca/LEGISINFO/index.asp?Language=E&Chamber=N&StartList=A&EndList=Z&Session=15&Type=0&Scope=I&query=5303&List=stat LEGISINFO - The Library of Parliament's research tool for finding information on legislation ] ] The Bill passed Third Reading in the Senate on December 13, 2007 and was re-introduced in the House of Commons by Conservative Member of Parliament Larry Miller where it passed 2nd Reading on March 11, 2008. The bill was referred to committee where an amendment was made to define lighthouse structures. The Third and final Commons vote was made on May 1, 2008 followed by a Senate vote to approve the amendment which the bill passed on May 8. Royal Assent was given on May 29, 2008. [ http://www.parl.gc.ca/LEGISINFO/index.asp?Language=E&Chamber=N&StartList=A&EndList=Z&Session=15&Type=0&Scope=I&query=5303&List=stat LEGISINFO - The Library of Parliament's research tool for finding information on legislation ] ] The Act comes into effect two years after Royal Assent. [Steven Chase "Bill A Beacon of Hope for Decaying Lighthouses", "Globe and Mail" May 9, 2008, p. A11]

upport

The bill enjoyed consistent multi-party support from its Conservative sponsors but also Liberals such as Newfoundland MP Scott Simms and New Democratic Party MP Peter Stoffer who withdrew his own private members bill to protect lighthouses in support of S-220 [ [http://www.heritagecanada.org/eng/featured/current.html The Heritage Canada Foundation - Featured Heritage Buildings ] ] . Other MPs such as Catherine Bell from British Columbia welcomed an initiative to preserving a national landmark as a healthy alternative to contentious partisan issues of a minority Parliament. [ [http://www.catherinebellmp.ca/page/325 Press release: Budget “No”, Preserving Heritage Lighthouses “Yes” Says MP Catherine Bell | NDP ] ] . The only formal opposition has been voiced by a Bloc Quebecois MP Raynald Blais who said he could not support the bill because it might mask federal neglect of other DFO responsibilities. [Hansard Vol. 141 No. 129 1st Session 39th Parliament March 27, 2007 http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Pub=Hansard&Doc=129&Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=39&Ses=1&DocId=2805041&File=0#Int-1986764] In addition to regional lighthouse advocates such as the Nova Scotia Lighthouse Preservation Society, the Heritage Canada Foundation has been a consistent supporter noting that lighthouses need special protection because of the lack of federal legislation for any federal buildings. [ http://www.heritagecanada.org/eng/news/pdf/HeritageReportCardforCanada_2007.pdfhttp://www.heritagecanada.org/eng/news/pdf/HeritageReportCardforCanada_2007.pdf] Despite the broad public support for the bill, some federal departmental staff initially opposed the bill suggesting it could cost up to $384 million dollars to upgrade all of Canada's lighthouses to heritage standards. [Federal bill to protect lighthouses running out of time in Parliament, "Macleans" June 9, 2007 Hannah Zitner Canadian press http://www.macleans.ca/canada/wire/article.jsp?content=n060908A ] Supporters of the bill have called these numbers inflated, pointing out that it assumes that every pieces of navigational equipment in the country, including hundreds of steel tower, fibreglass poles , and floating buoys, would be designated whereas even the strongest proponents only anticipate the nomination of a select number of landmark lighthouses. They also note that the bill leaves control of the number of designations, and any associated, costs, with the minister. [Lighthouse Bill Protecting Our Lighthouses - The Icons of Canada's Maritime Heritage by Douglas Franklin http://www.heritagecanada.org/eng/featured/current.html]

References

External links

* Text of Bill http://www2.parl.gc.ca/content/Senate/Bills/392/public/S-215/S-215_3/S-215_cover-e.htm
* Legislative Information, Library of Parliament http://www.parl.gc.ca/LEGISINFO/index.asp?Language=E&Chamber=N&StartList=A&EndList=Z&Session=15&Type=0&Scope=I&query=5303&List=stat
* Nova Scota Lighthouse Preservation Society Bill S-215 News http://www.nslps.com/trip_and_program_calendar.asp


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем решить контрольную работу

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Heritage Canada — The Heritage Canada Foundation (French: Fondation Héritage Canada ), also known as Heritage Canada ( Héritage Canada ), is a registered charity with the mandate to encourage the protection and promotion of the built, natural, historic, and scenic …   Wikipedia

  • Gerald Keddy — Infobox CanadianMP | name=Gerald Gordon Keddy term start=1997 term end= cabinet= predecessor= Derek Wells birth date= birth date and age |1953|02|15 birth place= Bridgewater, Nova Scotia successor= death date= death place= profession=offshore… …   Wikipedia

  • Peter Stoffer — Infobox CanadianMP | name=Peter Arend Stoffer cabinet= term start=1997 term end= predecessor= District Created birth date=birth date and age |1956|01|06 birth place= flagicon|NED Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands death date= death place=… …   Wikipedia

  • Europe, history of — Introduction       history of European peoples and cultures from prehistoric times to the present. Europe is a more ambiguous term than most geographic expressions. Its etymology is doubtful, as is the physical extent of the area it designates.… …   Universalium

  • literature — /lit euhr euh cheuhr, choor , li treuh /, n. 1. writings in which expression and form, in connection with ideas of permanent and universal interest, are characteristic or essential features, as poetry, novels, history, biography, and essays. 2.… …   Universalium

  • Shetland — For other uses, see Shetland (disambiguation). Shetland Sealtainn …   Wikipedia

  • River Nene — River The River Nene at Kislingbury Watermill, Northamptonshir …   Wikipedia

  • New Haven, Connecticut — New Haven redirects here. For other uses, see New Haven (disambiguation). City of New Haven   City   Skyline of Downtown New Haven …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”