- Simon Fraser Student Society
The Simon Fraser Student Society (SFSS) is the
students' union ofSimon Fraser University in Vancouver,Canada . It was founded after the opening of Simon Fraser University in 1967 and has been affiliated with theCanadian Federation of Students since 1981.The SFSS consists of over 26,000 students, with an annual budget of over one million dollars.cite web| publisher= Simon Fraser Office of Analytical Studies |url= http://www.sfu.ca/analytical-studies/FactBook/factbook.html |title= Fact Book |accessdate= 2006-04-18] cite web| publisher= Simon Fraser Student Society |date=
September 28 2005 |url= http://www.sfss.ca/agm.html |title= Annual General Meeting |accessdate= 2006-04-18] Membership is mandatory, and all SFU students as members are charged fees collected by the university on behalf of the SFSS. The organization employs permanent and student staff, and is located on one floor of the Maggie Benston Center at SFU's Burnaby campus. The society also has an office and provides services at the satellite campus of SFU Surrey. The SFSS does not own a student union building.The SFSS operates a bookstore and printshop, a soup bar, a coffee shop, a pub, a women's center, and a
LGBT center on campus. It employs anombudsman , distributes dayplanners, and provides legal clinics and funding for campus clubs, events, conferences, and political special interest groups.tructure
The Simon Fraser Student Society has two major decision-making bodies (Forum and the Board of Directors) and a variety of committees. [ cite web |title= Simon Fraser Student Society: About Us |url=http://www.sfss.ca/about.html |accessdate= 2007-10-10]
Forum comprises the Board of Directors and elected representatives from Departmental Students' Unions and Graduate Caucuses. This body is responsible for the general direction of the Society, as well as advising the Board on a variety of issues relevant to students.
The Board of Directors is comprised entirely of representatives elected directly by students. The Board is responsible for, and exercises full control over the affairs of the Society. In addition, it is the only recognized medium of communication between its members, the University and the general public. The Board meets bi-weekly year-round.
Since the creation of the SFSS in 1967, it has represented graduate and undergraduate students with one Society. However, during the Spring 2007 election, Graduate Students voted to form their own society separate from the SFSS. [ cite news| work= The Peak |date=
March 26 2007 |url= http://www.peak.sfu.ca/the-peak/2007-1/issue12/ne-sfss.html |title= Campus: Incumbents Dominate Election |accessdate= 2007-09-02] This is the Graduate Students Society (GSS) at Simon Fraser University. The expected start date for full separation isMay 1 2008 .Graduate students are able to participate in a Graduate Issues Committee that comprises graduate representatives elected from the Departmental Caucus. Two seats for graduate students are guaranteed on the Board of Directors with the Graduate Issues Officer and the Graduate At-Large Representative. However, graduate students may run for any position on the Board. There are seats on the committees of the Society specifically for representatives from the Graduate Issues Committee.
Like many student unions in BC, the SFSS also relies heavily on a permanent
staff , who hold various bureaucratic positions and help assist board members and in some cases assist in the development of policy. SFSS staff are members of theCanadian Union of Public Employees .History
Since its founding in 1967, the organization has been highly politicized, generally led by
left wing leaders. Main campaigns have centered around opposing tuition fee increases and increasing student financial assistance. In addition, the Society has also campaigned for student-dominated university decision-making, academic freedom, improved student services,social democracy ,women's rights ,gay rights , First Nations, the disabled, and international students. The SFSS' membership in theCanadian Federation of Students has been an enormously controversial, and has been debated in almost every SFSS election to date.In 2005, members voted in favour of a graduate health and dental plan. The Student Society began providing health and dental plan services to graduate students in September 2005.
Controversies
tudent health plan
In 1996, the organization imposed a mandatory health plan to the student population after passing a referendum question during an earlier election. The health plan sparked much controversy on campus. A group of students started a campaign to dissolve the student society, drastically reduce the student society membership fees, withdraw from the
Canadian Federation of Students , and to eliminate the health plan. A student petition resulted in having three referendum questions decided in the 1997 general election. Of the three referendum questions, only the referendum question on axing the health plan passed.cite news| work= The Peak |date=April 1 1997 |url= http://www.peak.sfu.ca/the-peak/97-1/issue13/health.html |title= Students axe health plan |accessdate= 2006-04-14]Quorum
Until recently, a
quorum of 500 members is required to make any changes to the Student Society'sbylaw s andconstitution at the Society'sannual general meeting . As the university has approximately 28,000 students, it means that only 2% of student population is needed to make wide reaching changes with regards to the SFSS. Despite this, quorum has been unattainable most years, cite news| work= The Peak |date=July 25 2005 |url= http://www.peak.sfu.ca/the-peak/2005-2/issue13/ne-sfss.html |title= SFSS releases AGM plans, agenda |accessdate= 2006-04-25] In 2005, the Society proposed to change the bylaw for quorum from 500 to 100.In the fall 2003 semester, the Society spent $15,000 hosting a free dinner for students to encourage turnout at the annual general meeting to achieve quorum. Although the quorum of 500 was met, students left part-way through the meeting, causing the meeting to lose quorum. As a result no voting was done, and an outcry ensued from students for allegedly wasting student fees.cite news| work = The Peak |date =
October 27 2003 |url= http://www.peak.sfu.ca/the-peak/2003-3/issue9/ne-chicken.html |title= Lack of students stalls democracy |accessdate= 2006-04-14] The 2006 special general meeting (see "Impeachment") marks the first time quorum has been effectively reached in 10 years.On 10 October 2007, members of the Simon Fraser Student Society achieved the
quorum of over 500 at theannual general meeting , three major by-laws changes occurred. Graduate students, who had previously voted for full independence in March, will as of March or September 2008 no longer be members of the Simon Fraser Student Society. Graduate students were, throughout the meeting, the majority of attendees, and had an interest in the above amendment, shown by their higher than usual turnout (Graduate students represent about 15% of all students at SFU). A motion to lower quorum from 500 to 250 passed with 77%, and another resolution passed giving members of the society the ability to vote on future by-law changes by referenda as well as at General meetings, also passed. cite news| work= The Peak |date=Oct 15 2007 |url= http://www.peak.sfu.ca/the-peak/2007-3/issue7/ne-agm.html|title= Motion Reduces Quorum |accessdate= 2007-10-16]Impeachment
In July 2006, the Board of Directors directed seven full time staff members to go on leave with pay and benefits to complete an investigation into internal issues. The investigation lasted 5 working days. Society keys and email passwords were confiscated, and computers were searched. Staff were directed not to enter SFSS property until directed otherwise. cite news| work= The Peak |date=
July 31 2006 |url= http://www.peak.sfu.ca/the-peak/2006-2/issue13/ne-sfss1.html|title= Campus Fiasco: Seven SFSS staff sent home |accessdate= 2006-08-01] In August, a staff member was fired as a result of the investigation. Directors, in Board meetings on July 26, August 9, and 23, have outlined that they are bound by confidentiality in their collective agreement with CUPE 5396, and can not disclose the justifications for terminating the employee. However, they have iterated that they hadjust cause and that they are prepared to go toarbitration .cite news| work= The Peak |date=September 5 2006 |url= http://www.peak.sfu.ca/the-peak/2006-3/issue1/ne-sfss.html|title= Campus: Contentious August Board meeting fires students up |accessdate= 2006-09-05]An organisation called Students for a Democratic University instigated a petition for a special general meeting under the SFSS's bylaws and the Society Act of British Columbia that called for the impeachment of seven directors and two bylaw changes that would alter funding and decision making authority within the SFSS. The petition had signatures from 9.8% of all students, exceeding the 5% required to call a meeting, according to an SFSS bylaw. Despite this, the directors up for impeachment insisted the petition was insufficient, quoting the Society Act, [cite web |title= BC Society Act |url=http://www.qp.gov.bc.ca/statreg/stat/S/96433_01.htm#section58 |accessdate= 2006-12-27] which says a meeting must be called if 10% sign a petition.
A special general meeting (called by Forum) of the SFSS was held on
October 25 ,2006 in the school's Convocation Mall. 1028 students attended overall (up to 760 at the same time) the Special General Meeting, and voted in favor of motions to impeach the seven directors (Shawn Hunsdale, Wei Li, Margo Dunnet, Vanessa Kelly, Erica Halpern, Marion Pollock, Glyn Lewis) and to two amendments to the bylaws of the society.In response, the seven directors claimed that the special general meeting was invalid by claiming the Forum meeting used to call the special general meeting itself was invalid, and issued guidelines to the staff of the society. [cite web |title= SFSS memo |date=
2006-10-26 |url= http://www.sfu.ca/~yangz/memo.pdf |accessdate= 2006-10-27] They asked theSupreme Court of British Columbia to declare the impeachments invalid. [cite web |title= Court notice |date=2006-10-26 |url= http://www.sfu.ca/~mguzman/hibbits_ltr.pdf|accessdate= 2006-10-27] The bank account of the SFSS was frozen due to the controversy over who were the legitimate directors of the SFSS.cite news |url=http://www.peak.sfu.ca/the-peak/2006-3/issue10/ne-sgm.html |title= Campus: University supports SGM, Society bank account frozen |author= Earl Tapia |work= The Peak |accessdate= 2007-09-10 |date=2006-11-06 ] This issue was resolved onNovember 23 2006 with a court order enforcing an agreement between the impeached directors and the remaining directors.cite news |url= http://www.peak.sfu.ca/the-peak/2006-3/issue13/ne-sfss.html |title= Campus: SFSS bank accounts unfrozen |author= Earl Tapia |work= The Peak |accessdate= 2007-09-10 |date=2006-11-27 ]While President Shawn Hunsdale has resigned after his impeachment, he maintained his claim that the special general meeting that impeached him is invalid. [cite web |title= Shawn Hunsdale Open letter of Resignation |date=
2006-10-31 |url= http://www.peak.sfu.ca/the-peak/2006-3/issue9/le-lotw.html
accessdate= 2006-10-31] The President of the University itself, Michael Stevenson, stated that until the Supreme Court of BC made a decision, students, as well as the impeached directors, should respect the SGM.In December 2006, the BC Supreme Court [cite web |title= 2006 BCSC 1873 Simon Fraser Student Society v. Gregory |url= http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/Jdb-txt/SC/06/18/2006BCSC1873.htm |accessdate= 2006-12-27] ruled that the special general meeting and impeachment were legitimate and there was no issue with the Forum. The court also stated that in the event that there was a problem with the Forum, the petition was sufficient and should have been followed, and assigned all costs to the individual impeached directors.
Canadian Federation of Students
In March 2007 the Simon Fraser Student Society conducted a non-binding plebiscite where over 75% of voting members voted to leave the CFS.
After this plebiscite the SFSS engaged in the regular defederation process, collecting over 3000 signatures during the summer semester for a defederation vote six months hence.
However, the SFSS subsequently disregarded the CFS bylaws which require any defederation referendum to be conducted by a committee consisting of two (2) members appointed by the Federation and two (2) members appointed by the member local association. Instead the SFSS held their own referendum, conducted internally by the SFSS Independent Electoral Commission (IEC). In the vote, which was held in March of 2008, students again voted to leave by a 66% majority.
The status of the 2008 referendum remains disputed by both parties, with the SFSS maintaining it is no longer a member of the CFS and the CFS maintaining that it is. Both the CFS and SFSS are currently petitioning the courts to have their arguments legally upheld.
References
ee also
*
List of British Columbia students' associations External links
* [http://www.sfss.ca SFSS Website]
* [http://www.sfugradsociety.ca GSS Website]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.