- Cenomani (Cisalpine Gaul)
The Cenomani (Greek: polytonic|Κενομάνοι,
Strabo , Ptol.; polytonic|Γονομάνοι, Polyb.), was an ancient tribe of theCisalpine Gaul s, who occupied the tract north of the Padus (modernPo River ), between theInsubres on the west and theVeneti on the east. Their territory appears to have extended from the riverAddua (or perhaps the Ollius, the modernOglio ) to the Athesis (modernAdige ). Whether these Cenomani are the same people as theCenomani in Gallia Celtica encountered by Julius Caesar is a subject of debate (seeCenomani ).Both
Polybius andLivy expressly mention them among the tribes of Gauls which had crossed the Alps within historical memory, and had expelled the Etruscans from the territory in which they established themselves and subsequently continued to occupy. (Pol. ii. 17; Liv. v. 35.) Livy relates that about400 BC E, under the leadership ofElitovius (Livy V.35), a large number of the Cenomani crossed intoItaly , drove the Etruscans southwards, and occupied their territory. The statement ofCato (in Pliny, "Nat. Hist". III.130), that some of them settled nearMassilia in the territory of theVolcae , may indicate the route taken by them. It is remarkable that they appear in history almost uniformly as friendly to the Romans, and refusing to take part with their kindred tribes against them. Thus, during the great Gaulish war in225 BC E, when theBoii and Insubres took up arms against Rome, the Cenomani, as well as their neighbours the Veneti, concluded an alliance with theRoman Republic , and the two nations together furnished a force of 20,000 men, with which they threatened the frontier of the Insubres. (Pol. ii. 23, 24, 32; Strab. v. p. 216.) Even whenHannibal invaded Cisalpine Gaul they continued faithful to the Romans, and furnished a body of auxiliaries, who fought with them at theBattle of the Trebia . (Liv. xxi. 55.) After the close of theSecond Punic War , however, they took part in the revolt of the Gauls underHamilcar (200 BC E), and again a few years later joined their arms with those of the Insubres: but even then the defection seems to have been but partial, and after their defeat by the consulGaius Cornelius Cethegus (197 BC E), they hastened to submit, and thenceforth continued faithful allies of the Romans. (Liv. xxxi. 10, xxxii. 30, xxxix. 3.) From this time they disappear from history, and became gradually merged in the condition of Roman subjects, until in49 BC E they acquired, with the rest of the Transpadane Gauls, the full rights of Roman citizens. (Dion Cass. xli. 36.)The limits of the territory occupied by them are not very clearly defined. Strabo omits all notice of them in the geographical description of Gallia Cisalpina, and assigns their cities to the Insubres. Livy speaks of Brixia (modern
Brescia ) andVerona as the chief cities in their territory. Pliny assigns to themCremona and Brixia: while Ptolemy gives them a much wider extent, comprising not only Bergamum (modernBergamo ) andMantua , butTridentum also, which was certainly aRhaetia n city. (Strab. v. p. 213; Liv. v. 35; Plin. iii. 19. s. 23; Ptol. iii. 1. § 31.) It is singular that Polybius, in one passage (ii. 32), appears to describe the river Clusius (modernChiese ), as separating them from the Insubres: but this is probably a mistake. The limits above assigned them, namely, the Addua on the west, the Athesis on the east, and the Padus on the south, may be regarded as approximately correct.The Alpine tribes of the
Camunni and theTriumpilini , which bordered on them on the north, are expressly described by Pliny as ofEuganean race, and were not therefore nationally connected with the Cenomani, though in his time at least united with them for administrative purposes.References
*SmithDGRG
*1911
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.