Sword of Attila

The Sword of Attila was the legendary weapon carried by Attila the Hun. The Roman historian Jordanes, quoting the work of the historian Priscus, gave the story of its origin:

"When a certain shepherd beheld one heifer of his flock limping and could find no cause for this wound, he anxiously followed the trail of blood and at length came to a sword it had unwittingly trampled while nibbling the grass. He dug it up and took it straight to Attila. He rejoiced at this gift and, being ambitious, thought he had been appointed ruler of the whole world, and that through the sword of Mars supremacy in all wars was assured to him." [Jordanes, "The Origin and Deeds of the Goths" ch. XXXV ( [http://www.boudicca.de/jordanes3-e.htm e-text)] )]

The use of "Mars" here is due to the "interpretatio romana" of Priscus, however, as the Huns would not have adopted the names of Roman deities; the more likely name used by the Huns would have been the more generic "sword of the war god;" Hungarian legends refer to it simply as "az Isten kardja," the sword of God. Priscus's description is also notable for describing how Attila used it as both a military weapon and a symbol of divine favor, which may have contributed to his reputation as "the Scourge of God," a divinely-appointed punisher. As historian Edward Gibbon elaborated, "the vigor with which Attila wielded the sword of Mars, convinced the world that it had been reserved alone for his invincible arm." [ [http://www.worldwideschool.org/library/books/hst/roman/TheDeclineandFallofTheRomanEmpire-3/chap28.html The History of the Decline and Fall of The Roman Empire vol. 3 Ch. XXXIV Part 1] ] In this way it became somewhat of a sceptre as well, representing Attila's right to rulership.

In the eleventh century, some five hundred years after the death of Attila, a sword claimed to have belonged to him surfaced, according to Lambert of Hersfeld, [Lambertus, in Johann Pistorius, "Illustrium Veterum Scriptorum, qui rerum a Germanis..." (Frankfurt 1613), quoted in William Herbert, "Attila, King of the Huns" (London: Bohn) 1838:350f.] who attributed its provenance to the recently-established Árpád kings of Hungary, who appropriated the cult of Attila and linked a claimed descent from him with their right to rule. [Patrick Howarth, "Attila, King of the Huns : Man and Myth" 1995:183f.] The occasion was the unfortunate death of Leopold de Merspurg, [Merseburg perhaps.] a counsellor to the king, who fell from his horse and was impaled upon his own sword. The sword's history given by Johann Pistorius, was that it had been given by the queen-mother [She would have been Anastasia of Kiev, a daughter of Grand Duke Yaroslav I the Wise of Kiev.] of King Salomon" to Otho, Duke of Bavaria, who had urged the emperor to reinstate Salomon's possessions. Otho had given it to Dedus, younger son of the margrave Dedus, after whose death it had come to the king, [ William Herbert notes that this would have been Henry IV, Holy Roman Emperor.] who had given it to Leopold, whose death— it was asserted by partisans of his rival Otho— had been a divine judgment.

There is no evidence to substantiate these medieval claims of its origin with Attila; the sword, in the Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna, as part of the Hapsburg "Schatzkammer" in fact appears to be work of ninth or tenth century Hungarian goldsmiths. [Hermann Fillitz, "Die Schatzkammer in Wien: Symbole abendländischen Kaisertums"; [http://www.chicagohungarians.com/radics/Origin2a.htm ChicagoHungarians.com Illustration of the Vienna Kunsthistorisches Museum's ninth-tenth century "Sword of God"] ] .

References

External links

[http://www.chicagohungarians.com/radics/Origin2a.htm ChicagoHungarians.com page on the Vienna Museum's "Attila Sword"]