- David Zvi Hoffman
:"For the American documentary filmmaker, see
David Hoffman "David Zvi Hoffmann (
November 24 ,1843 – 1921) (Hebrew : דוד צבי הופמן), was an Orthodox Jewish Rabbi and Torah Scholar. Born inVerbó in 1843, he attended variousYeshiva s in his native town before he entered the college at Pressburg, from which he graduated in 1865. He then studiedphilosophy , history, and Oriental languages atVienna andBerlin , taking his doctor's degree in 1871 fromTuebingen University . His rabbinical training was at the hands ofMaharam Schick andAzriel Hildesheimer .Shortly after obtaining his degree, he became employed as a teacher in
Samson Raphael Hirsch 's "Realschule" school inFrankfurt am Main , and in 1873 moved to Berlin to join the faculty of the Rabbinical Seminary of Berlin where he eventually becamerector in 1899 after the death of Azriel Hildesheimer.A selective "Wissenschaft" practitioner
David Hoffmann occupies a very interesting position in the "
Wissenschaft des Judentums " movement of the 19th century, as shown by Harvtxt|Ellenson|Jacobs|1988, and is in some ways the prototype of the contemporaryOrthodox Jewish scholar, facing the ubiquitous tension between faithfulness to tradition and the demands of critical inquiry. Though born inHungary , he adapted the German-Jewish approach of openness towards general culture, world and society. He employed the critical scientific method to theTalmud and wrote about the history of the development of the form of the Oral law (as opposed to the development of the Law itself, the latter being an enterprise antithetical to traditional Jewish beliefs; see below). Despite his worldly inclinations, he was an original member of the more traditionally oriented "Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah " (council of great Torah sages), and was also known to be a person of great moral conduct and piety.Hoffman was the leading authority on traditional Jewish Law (halacha) in
Germany in his lifetime, an expert specifically in the area ofMidrash halakha (legalisticBiblical exegesis ), and was also well known for his efforts to disprove theDocumentary Hypothesis as expressed by the Graf-Wellhausen theory, his arguments being presented in a famous work entitled "Die wichtigsten Instanzen gegen die Graf-Wellhausensche Hypothese" (1903/1916).A. Altmann , however, sees Hoffmann's writings on these matters (though evidencing great expertise) as pure apologetics, the cause of which may be seen as laid out in his introduction toLeviticus Harv|Ellenson|Jacobs|1988, where Hoffmann makes the following remarks:quotation|I willingly agree that, in consequence of the foundation of my belief, I am unable to arrive at the conclusion that the Pentateuch was written by anyone other than
Moses ... We believe that the wholeBible is true, holy, and of divine origin. That every word of theTorah was inscribed by divine command is expressed in the principle "Torah min Ha Shamayim"... We must not presume to set ourselves up as critics of the author of a biblical text or doubt the truth of his statements or question the correctness of his teaching...The Jewish commentator must (therefore) constantly be on guard against interpreting the passage in such a way as to appear to be in conflict with traditionalHalachah . Just as the Torah as a divine revelation must not contradict itself, in the same way it must not contradict the Oral Law which is of divine origin. Yet, despite the piety of the above sentiments, and his repeated proclamations regarding the divinity of the Oral Law, Hoffmann was still very much the "Wissenschaft" scholar. He cites in his work scholars such asZ. Frankel ,A. Geiger ,S.J. Rapoport , andH. Graetz , he studies the influences ofAncient Near Eastern culture on the evolution of the Talmud, and he identifies problems in the transmitted text. For example, Hoffmann in "The First Mishna" sees the present MishnaAvot as having been redacted from three different sources, a Mishna ofRabbi Akiva , a Mishna ofRabbi Meir , and a Mishna ofRabbi Judah Ha-Nasi , the originals of which cannot be completely reconstructed due to their thoroughgoing fusion and subsequent manipulation.The extent to which Hoffmann resided in the "Wissenschaft" movement can also be seen from the criticism he received from such opponents of the movement as Samson Raphael Hirsch. Hildesheimer notes regarding Hirsch's opinion of his Rabbinical Seminary (where Hoffmann worked after leaving Hirsch's institution) that "a question certainly exists as to whether Rabbi Hirsch considers the seminary to be an Orthodox institution." Hirsch's opposition extended to Hoffmann's own work, judging Hoffmann's book "Mar Samuel" to contain heresies Harv|Ellenson|Jacobs|1988.
Hoffmann's resolution of this tension between faithfulness to tradition and textual criticism is found by Harvtxt|Ellenson|Jacobs|1988 in the following passage from the introduction to "The First Mishna":
Writings
Some of Hoffman's works include "Die Erste Mishna", "The First Mishna", a historical and linguistic analysis of the
Mishnah and "Melamed Le-ho'il", aresponsa on contemporary issues based on historical evidence of tradition. He also published a commentary on thePentateuch that included a translation of the text into German. Later this commentary was translated into Hebrew, though today it is out of print. Most of his writings were in German and remain so to this day. "The First Mishna" was translated into English, and a selection of his comments on thePassover Haggada have been published in Hebrew as well. He published a translation of two of the orders of the Mishna into German.References
*JewishEncyclopedia
*.External links
* [http://jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=836&letter=H Jewish Encyclopedia entry on David Zvi Hoffmann] , written by
Isidore Singer
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.