- Al-Marri v. Wright
"al-Marri v. Wright", No. 06-7427 (
2007 ), was a decision of the Fourth Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals that held a United States resident cannot be held on suspicion of terrorist activities, but must be charged in a domestic court or released.The
United States Supreme Court might agree to hear "al-Marri v. Wright" during the 2008 term. [cite news |first= |last= |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=The Supreme Court’s New Term |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/06/opinion/06mon1.html |work=New York Times |publisher= |date=2008-10-06 |accessdate= ]Background
The federal government arrested
Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri on December 12, 2001 and brought him up on charges two years later on apparently unrelated charges of credit card fraud and assorted crimes of dishonesty. On June 23, 2003, PresidentGeorge W. Bush determined al-Marri an enemy combatant and ordered him transferred to the custody of the Department of Defense. [ [http://news.findlaw.com/nytimes/docs/almarri/usalmarri62303ecord.html Enemy Combatant Designation by President Bush] .] The federal government asserts he is a sleeper agent for the terrorist organizationAl-Qaeda , sent to the United States to explore future disruptions of the country's financial systems, thus justifying his detention without trial in civilian courts. Since that time, he has been held at a naval brig in Charleston, South Carolina, and is the only known enemy combatant held in military custody on U.S. soil (others are being held at theGuantanamo Bay detention camp in Cuba).Decision
Judge
Diana Gribbon Motz wrote the majority opinion, which held that as a legal resident of the United States who was originally detained within the United States, al-Marri may not be held in military custody as an enemy combatant. The court also held that theMilitary Commissions Act does not strip federal courts of jurisdiction to hear habeas corpus petitions from alleged enemy combatants arrested and detained within the borders of the U.S. The court then ordered the government to either charge al-Marri with a crime, to initiate deportation proceedings, or to release him.Dissenting from the opinion, Judge Henry E. Hudson indicated that he believed Bush possessed the authority to detain alleged sleeper agents such as al-Marri, "the type of stealth warrior used by Al Qaeda." [ [http://news.findlaw.com/nytimes/docs/almarri/almarriwright61107opn.pdf Complete decision on Findlaw.com] , Hudson's Dissent, at pg. 86.]
References
External links
* [http://news.findlaw.com/nytimes/docs/almarri/almarriwright61107opn.pdf Complete decision on Findlaw.com]
* [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/11/washington/11cndcnd-combatant.html?hp Coverage] from theNew York Times
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.