- Aerodynamic drag
**Note**This article is currently under renovation, and may, at times, appear disjoint. Please see the [

*http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Aerodynamic_drag Discussion Page*] .**Introduction****Aerodynamic drag**refers to the retarding force on moving aerodynamic bodies acting in the direction of the freestream flow [*Anderson 2000*] . The drag in the body perspective (near-field approach) comes from forces due to pressure distributions over the body surface, symbolized $D\_\{pr\}$, and forces due to skin friction, which is a result of viscosity, denoted $D\_\{f\}$. Alternatively, the drag force calculated in the flowfield perspective (far-field approach) comes from three natural phenomena: shock waves, vortex sheet and viscosity.

The pressure distribution over the body surface exert a normal forces which, summed and projected into the freestream direction,represent the drag force due to pressure $D\_\{pr\}$. The nature of these normal forces combines shock wave effects, vortex systemgeneration effects and wake viscous mechanisms all together.

When the viscosity effect over the pressure distribution is considered separately, the resultant drag force is namely pressuredrag or, alternatively, form drag. In the absence of viscosity, the pressure forces on the vehicle cancel each other and, hence, thedrag is zero. Pressure drag is the dominant component in the case of vehicles with regions of separated flow, in which the pressurerecovery is fairly ineffective.

The friction drag force, which is a tangential force on the aircraft surface, depends substantially on boundary layer configuration andviscosity. The calculated friction drag $D\_f$ utilizes the x-projection of the viscous stress tensor evaluated on eachdiscretized body surface.

The sum of friction drag and pressure (form) drag is called viscous drag. This drag component takes into account the influence ofviscosity. In a thermodynamic perspective, viscous effects represent irreversible phenomena and, therefore, they create entropy. Thecalculated viscous drag $D\_v$ use entropy changes to accurately predict the drag force.

When the airplane produces lift, another drag component comes in. Induced drag, symbolized $D\_i$, comes about due to a modification on the pressure distribution due to the trailing vortex system that accompanies the lift production. Induced drag tends to be the most important component for airplanes during take-off or landing flight. Other drag component, namely wave drag, $D\_w$, comes about from shock waves in transonic and supersonic flight speeds. The shock waves induce changes in the boundary layer and pressure distributionover the body surface. It is worth noting that not only viscous effects but also shock waves induce irreversible phenomena and, as aconsequence, they can be measured through entropy changes along the domain as well. Figure ef{DragBreakDown} is a summary of thevarious aspects previously discussed.**Theoretical Aspects of Far-Field/Near-Field Balance**The drag force calculation can be performed using the integral of force balance in the freestream direction as

$int\_\{S=S\_\{infty\}+S\_D+S\_A\}left\; [\; ho,u,vec\{q\}+left(p-p\_\{infty\}\; ight)vec\{i\}\; -\; vec\{\; au\}\_\{x\}\; ight]\; .vec\{n\}dS,=,0$

which surrounds the body represents the union of two unconnected surfaces,

$S\; =\; underbrace\{S\_\{A\_\{Aircraft,Surf.\};+;underbrace\{S\_\{D\}+S\_\{infty\_\{Far,Surf.\}$

where $S\_\{A\}$ is the airplane surface, $S\_\{D\}$ is the outlet surface and $S\_\{infty\}$ represents both the lateral and inlet surfaces. In general, the far-field control volume is located in the boundaries of the domain $(V)$ and its choice is user-defined. In Subsection ef{sGF}, further considerations concerning to the correct selection of the far-field boundary are given, allowing for desired flow characteristics.Equation ( ef{ta1}) can be decomposed into two surface integrals, yielding

$int\_\{S\_\{Aleft\; [\; ho,u,vec\{q\}+left(p-p\_\{infty\}\; ight)vec\{i\}\; -vec\{\; au\}\_\{x\}\; ight]\; ,.,vec\{n\},dS\; =-int\_\{S\_\{D\}+S\_\{inftyleft\; [\; ho,u,vec\{q\}+left(p-p\_\{infty\}\; ight)vec\{i\}\; -vec\{\; au\}\_\{x\}\; ight]\; ,.,vec\{n\},dS$

The right-hand side integral in Eq. ( ef{ta2}) represents the reaction forces of the airplane. The left-hand side integral in Eq.( ef{ta2}) represents the total force exerted by the fluid. Mathematically, these two integrals are equivalent. However, thenumerical integration of these terms will hardly lead to the same result, because the solution is approximated. In the terminology ofComputational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), when the integration is performed using the left-hand side integral in Eq. ( ef{ta2}), thenear-field method is employed. On the other hand, when the integration of the right-hand side in Eq. ( ef{ta2}) is computed,the far-field method is considered.The drag force balance is assured mathematically by Eq. ( ef{ta2}), that is, the resultant drag force evaluated using thenear-field approach must be equal to the drag force extracted by the far-field approach. The correct drag breakdown considered in thiswork is

$underbrace\{D\_f\; +\; D\_\{pr\_\{near-field\}\; =\; underbrace\{D\_i\; +\; D\_w\; +\; D\_v\}\_\{far-field\}$**See also***

Drag equation

*Drag coefficient **Notes and references*** Anderson, John D. Jr. "Introduction to Flight Fourth Edition" Boston, Massachusetts: McGraw Hill Higher Education, 2000.

*Wikimedia Foundation.
2010.*