- Garrity v. New Jersey
SCOTUSCase
Litigants=Garrity v. New Jersey
ArgueDate=November 10
ArgueYear=1966
DecideDate=January 16
DecideYear=1967
FullName=Garrity v. New Jersey
USVol=385
USPage=493
Citation=
Prior=
Subsequent=
Holding=Where police officers being investigated were given choice either to incriminate themselves or to forfeit their jobs under New Jersey statute on ground of self-incrimination, and officers chose to make confessions, confessions were not voluntary but were coerced, and Fourteenth Amendment prohibited their use in subsequent criminal prosecution in state court.
SCOTUS=1965-1967
Majority=Douglas
JoinMajority=Warren, Black, Brennan, Fortas
Concurrence=
JoinConcurrence=
Concurrence2=
JoinConcurrence2=
Concurrence/Dissent=
JoinConcurrence/Dissent=
Dissent=Harlan, Clark, Stewart
JoinDissent=
Dissent2=White
JoinDissent2=
LawsApplied=U.S. Const. Amend. V., U.S. Const. Amend. XIV"Garrity v. New Jersey", 385 U.S. 493 (
1967 ), [ [http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=385&page=493 385 U.S. 493] Full text of the opinion courtesy of Findlaw.com.] was a case in which theSupreme Court of the United States held that law enforcement officers and other public employees have the right to be free from compulsory self-incrimination.References
ee also
*
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 385
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.