Constitutional colorblindness

Constitutional colorblindness

Constitutional colorblindness is an aspect of United States Supreme Court case evaluation that began with Justice Harlan's dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896. Prior to this (and for a good while afterwards), the Supreme Court considered color as a determining factor in many landmark cases. Constitutional colorblindness holds that skin color or race is virtually never a legitimate ground for legal or political distinctions, and thus, any law that is "color conscious" is presumptively unconstitutional regardless of whether its intent is to subordinate a group, or remedy discrimination. The concept, therefore, has been brought to bear both against vestiges of Jim Crow oppression, as well as remedial efforts aimed at overcoming such discrimination, such as affirmative action.


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужна курсовая?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Racism in the United States — Part of a series of articles on Racial segregation Segregation in the US Black Codes Jim Cro …   Wikipedia

  • Jim Crow laws — Jim Crow redirects here. For other uses, see Jim Crow (disambiguation). Part of a series on …   Wikipedia

  • Jim Crow — Entrada para negros en un cine. Las leyes de Jim Crow fueron unas leyes estatales y locales en los Estados Unidos promulgadas entre 1876 y 1965, que asignaban la segregación racial en todas las instalaciones públicas por mandato de iure bajo el… …   Wikipedia Español

  • Korematsu v. United States — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Korematsu v. United States ArgueDateA=October 11 ArgueDateB=12 ArgueYear=1944 DecideDate=December 18 DecideYear=1944 FullName=Fred Korematsu v. United States USVol=323 USPage=214 Citation=65 S. Ct. 193; 89 L. Ed. 194; 1944… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”