- PRR T1
Infobox Locomotive
name=PRR T1
powertype=Steam
caption=A T1 at the Baldwin plant ready for delivery to the PRR.
gauge=RailGauge|ussg
railroad=Pennsylvania Railroad
numinclass=52
buildmodel=T1
whytetype=4-4-4-4
uicclass=2'BB2'
builddate=1942 (#6110–6111)
1945–46 (#5500–5549)
builder=Altoona Works (#5500–5524)Baldwin Locomotive Works (#5525–5549, 6110–6110)
serialnumber=Altoona 4560–4584
BLW 72764–72788 (#5525–5519)
disposition=scrapped
ThePennsylvania Railroad 's 52 T1 class duplex-drive4-4-4-4 steam locomotive s, introduced in1942 (2 prototypes) and1946 (50 production) were their last-built steam locomotives, and their most controversial. They were ambitious, technologically sophisticated, powerful, fast, and uniquely streamlined byRaymond Loewy . However, they were also prone to violentwheelslip both when starting and at speed, complicated to maintain, and expensive to run. In1948 , the PRR vowed to placediesel locomotive s on all express passenger trains, leaving unanswered whether the T1's flaws were solvable.However, a Spring, 2008 article in the Pennsylvania Railroad Technical and Historical Society Magazine revealed that the wheelslip problems were caused by the failure to properly train engineers transitioning to the T1, resulting in excessive throttle applications, which in turn caused the wheelslips on this very powerful locomotive. ["In Defense of the 5500's", Volume 41, Number 1, Pennsylvania Railroad Technical and Historical Society Magazine, Spring, 2008 ]Development
The last production express passenger class the PRR had produced was the K4s of
1914 , produced until1928 . Two experimental enlarged K5 locomotives were produced in1929 , but they were not considered enough of an improvement to be worthwhile. After that point, the PRR's attention switched toelectrification and the production ofelectric locomotive s; displaced steam locomotives meant that the railroad had an excess of steam power and no real need for additional locomotives.However, the deficiencies of the K4s became more and more glaringly obvious as the
1930s progressed. They were fine locomotives, but as train lengths increased, they were simply not big enough for the task. Double headed K4s locomotives became the norm on heavy trains. The railroad had the locomotives to spare, but paying two crews and running two locomotives per train was simply not the most economical choice. Meanwhile, other railroads were leaping ahead, developing larger and larger passenger power. RivalNew York Central built better and better Hudsons, while other roads developed passenger4-8-2 "Mountain" types and then4-8-4 "Northern" designs. The PRR's steam power began to look rather outdated indeed.In the mid to late 1930s, the PRR began to develop steam locomotives again, but with a difference. Previous PRR locomotive policy had been unrelentingly conservative, but new, radical designs took hold. Designers from the
Baldwin Locomotive Works , the PRR's longtime development partner, persuaded the railroad to adopt Baldwin's latest revolutionary idea; theduplex locomotive . This split the locomotive's driving wheels into two sets and gave each set its own pair of cylinders and rods. Previously, the only locomotives with split sets of drivers werearticulated locomotive s, but the duplex used one rigid frame. In a duplex design, cylinders could be smaller, pistons could be slower, and the weight of side and main rods could be drastically reduced. Given that the movement of the main rod cannot be fully counterbalanced, the duplex design would drastically reduce "hammer blow" on the track.The first PRR duplex was the single experimental S1 of
1939 . This proved successful, but it was simply too large a locomotive, and its size prohibited it from operating over most of the PRR's network. The concept being seemingly proven, the PRR returned to Baldwin, to develop a duplex design fit for series production. The last T1 entered service onAugust 27 1946 .cite web| author=Rivanna Chapter, National Railway Historical Society| url=http://avenue.org/nrhs/histaug.htm| title=This Month in Railroad History: August| date=2005| accessdate=2006-08-25| ]Today
All T1 locomotives were scrapped. However, an exact scale
live steam replica in 1 inch/foot scale (1:12) has been built by Ed Woodings, using the original T1 plans. In addition, the T1 has proven a fairly popular subject to be reproduced in model form.See also
*
NYC Niagara , the New York Central's successful equivalent locomotive.References
*
*External links
* [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3943/is_200505/ai_n13642634 Chesapeake & Ohio Tests the PRR T1 - Chesapeake and Ohio Historical Magazine, May 2005 by Stephenson, David R - The C&O test report contains information that is not widely known, and some of it contradicts generally accepted beliefs about the T1.]
* [http://prrsteam.pennsyrr.com/prrt1.php Photos of PRR 4-4-4-4 locomotives]
* [http://www.maxcowonline.com/maxspage/projectFiles.php?projectStringData=picdir%3DT1articlephotos%26picidx%3D1%26lastpic%3D20%26picstyle%3D0%26 An N Scale PRR T1 4-4-4-4 scratchbuilding project]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.