- Sex In Court
Infobox Television
show_name = Sex In Court
caption =
genre = Factual/Entertainment
runtime = 30 minutes approximately
creator =
developer =
producer =
executive_producer =
starring =
voices =
narrated =
theme_music_composer =
opentheme =
endtheme =
country = UK
location =London
language = English
network = E4
first_aired =March 29 2007
last_aired = present
num_series =
num_episodes = 7
list_episodes =
preceded_by =
followed_by =
related =
website = http://www.e4.com/
imdb_id =
tv_com_id ="Sex In Court" is a British factual
entertainment series which premiered on E4 onMarch 29 2007 .It takes a look at bedroom politics within modern relationships. The pilot features mother of two Rachel, who brings her husband Guy to court over a clash of lovemaking styles. Each episode sees people put on trial by their partner, or ex-partner. In a formal, court-like atmosphere, each party will be thoroughly cross-examined by a judge. Due to its nature E4 will air this programme after the watershed. The theme of the programme is very similar to
Playboy TV 'sSex Court .Episode Guide
Episode 1 - 29 March 2007
*Rachel v Guy - "Guy is obsessed with
anal sex ". - Guilty
**Sentence: Anal sex banned for a month and lubricant must be used.
*Joanna v Ashley - "Ashley has been secretly filming himself and Joanna having sex and showing this video to his mates.". - Guilty
**Sentence: Deletion of video and must ask for consent if he wishes to do it again.Episode 2 - 5 April 2007
*Whinnie v Themba - "Whinnie is accused of unfair denial of
cunnilingus ". - Not Guilty
**Sentence: Themba must never pressure Whinnie into it and Whinnie was given some aids to help her explore her own body.
*Marco v Anna - "Marco watches porn while having sex with Anna and he refuses to let her watch too.". - Guilty
**Sentence: Banning of pornography while having sex until Anna is ready to reintroduce it and she must take part.Episode 3 - 12 April 2007
*Ilian v Louisa - "Unfair refusal to reciprocate oral sex". - Guilty
**Sentence: Louisa is sent onfellatio course.
*Lauren v Ian - "Ian makes non-stop demands for early morning sex". - Guilty
**Sentence: Ban on morning sex and Ian most not wake Lauren if he decides to wake up to stop himself from wanting sex.Episode 4 - 19 April 2007
*Lee v Keeley - "Unreasonable refusal to dress up for sex". - Guilty
**Sentence: She must make Lee fantasy come true.
*Nathan v Emmy - "Unreasonable refusal to allowsemen on body and face". - Not Guilty
**Sentence: Nathan must abide to Emmy's rules.Episode 5 - 26 April 2007
*Liddy v Bobby - "Rebuffal of sexual advances". - Not Guilty
**Sentence: They are rewarded a night at a hotel away from Bobby's parents house.
*Laura v Chris - "Excessive demands for sex". - Not Guilty
**Sentence: They must come to some sort of compromise.Episode 6 - 3 May 2007
*Jenny v Matt - "Unfair refusal to indulge in sexual fantasy". - Not Guilty
**Sentence: None.
*Greg v Lucy - "Inconsiderate possession and use ofvibrator ". - Not Guilty
**Sentence: None.Episode 7 - 10 May 2007
*Joanne v Nick - "Treating sex as a joke". - Guilty
**Sentence: Jokes must be stopped and Nick sent on a sex course so he can satisfy Joanne for longer.
*Dawn v Dave - "Unfair withholding of dominant bedroom behaviour". - Not Guilty
**Sentence: NoneExternal links
* [http://www.e4.com E4.com]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.