- Narkomfin Building
The Narkomfin Building is a block of flats in
Moscow , designed byMoisei Ginzburg with Ignaty Milinis in 1928, and finished in 1932. Only two of four planned buildings were completed. The building is squeezed between old and new territories ofUnited States Embassy at 25, Novinsky Boulevard. A fine example ofConstructivist architecture andavant-garde interior planning, it is presently in a dilapidated state; most units were vacated by residents years ago. Proposed reconstruction, in the best case, will retain only exterior walls.Architecture for Collective Living
This apartment block, designed for workers at the Commissariat of Finance (shortened to
Narkomfin ) was an opportunity for Ginzburg to try out many of the theories advanced by the Constructivist OSA group in the course of the 1920s on architectural form and communal living. The building is made from reinforced concrete and is set in a park. It originally consisted of a long block of apartments raised onpiloti s (with a penthouse and roof garden), connected by an enclosed bridge to a smaller, glazed block of collective facilities.As advertised by the architects, the apartments were to form an intervention into the everyday life (or "byt") of the inhabitants. By offering Communal facilities such as kitchens, creches and laundry as part of the block, the tenants were encouraged into a more
socialist and, by taking women out of their traditional roles,feminist way of life. The structure was thus to act as a 'social condenser' by including within it a library and gymnasium.On the other hand, architects of
1920s had to face the social reality of an overcrowded socialist city: any single-family apartment unit with more than one room would eventually be converted to a multi-familykommunalka . Apartments could retain the single-family status if, and only if, they were physically small and could not be partitioned to accommodate more than one family. Any single-level apartment could be partitioned; thus, theavant-garde community (notably, Ginzburg andKonstantin Melnikov ) designed such model units, relying on vertical separation of bedroom (top level) and combined kitchen and living room (lower level).Ilya Golosov implemented these cells for his Collective House inIvanovo ; Pavel Gofman for communal housing inSaratov ( [http://archi.ru/events/news/news_current_press.html?nid=3475&fl=1&sl=1 photographs] ). Ginzburg refined their cell design based on real-life experience. [Russian: C.O. Хан-Магомедов, "Константин Мельников", p.56-59]Vertical apartment plan
Narkomfin currently has 54 units, none of them has a dedicated kitchen - at least, legally. Many residents partitioned their apartments to set aside a tiny kitchen. There are five inhabited floors, but only two corridors on second and fourth level (an apartment split between third and second level connects to the second floor corridor, etc.). This is a violation of present-day fire safety codes, exaggerated by the narrow, steep stairs inside apartments and wooden partitions.
Apartments were graded by how far along they were to being 'fully collectivised', ranging from rooms with their own kitchens to apartments purely for sleep and study. Most of the units belong to "Cell K" type (with double-height living room) and "Cell F" connecting to an outdoor gallery. The sponsor of the building, Commissar of Finance Nikolai Alexander Milyutin, enjoyed a penthouse (originally planned as a communal recreation area). Milyutin is also known as an experimental city planner who had developed plans for a
linear city .Influence
Le Corbusier , who studied the building during his visits to the Soviet Union, was vocal about the debt he owed to the pioneering ideas of the Narkomfin building, and he used a variant of its duplex flat plans in hisUnité d'Habitation . Other architects to have reused its ideas includeMoshe Safdie , in hisExpo 67 flatsHabitat 67 andDenys Lasdun , in his luxury flats in St James', London. The idea of the 'social condenser' was also acknowledged byBerthold Lubetkin an influence on his work.The Narkomfin Building as Reality
The
Utopianism and reformism of everday life that was behind the building's idea fell out of favour almost as soon as it was finished. After the start of the Five Year Plan andStalin 's consolidation of power, its collectivist and feminist ideas were rejected as 'Leftist' orTrotskyist . In the 1930s, the ground floor, which was originally left free and suspended with pilotis, was filled with flats to help alleviate Moscow's severe housing shortage, while a planned adjoining block was built in the eclectic Stalinist style. The building looks over the US embassy, which has discouraged the inhabitants from using the roof garden. The vicissitudes of the building were charted in Victor Buchli's book "An Archaeology of Socialism" (Berg, 2000) which takes the flats and their inhabitants as a starting point for an analysis of Soviet 'material culture'.Under Threat
The building has been falling apart for the last three decades, and is now in a grossly dilapidated state, although it is still inhabited in part. There have been various proposals to save the building, which has been under threat of demolition and is an area of particularly lucrative real estate, either by turning it into luxury flats or a hotel. The Narkomfin building is at the top of
UNESCO 's 'Endangered Buildings' list, and there is an international campaign to save it.Legally, each apartment unit in the building was privatized (beginning in 1992) by the residents. Later, a real estate speculator has bought out a significant part of these apartments; the rest is still owned and inhabited by the residents (as of now, the consolidated apartment package is owned by [http://www.pro-n.ru/news/05.12.2006/3.html MIAN agency] ). This creates a legal stalemate when the residents are unable to form a condominium and operate the building independently of municipal authorities - thus, the City Hall has nearly absolute control over the future fate of the Narkomfin.
Moscow City Hall, under mayor
Yuri Luzhkov , has a record of demolishing historically significant structures. Usually, the city-backed developers have no problems with evicting former residents from the old buildings, especially in case where many residents voluntarily vacated their old apartments. However, public protests against redevelopment of the Narkomfin seemed to stall the reconstruction process indefinitely.MIAN intends to rebuild Narkomfin into an apartment hotel, and commissioned Alexey Ginzburg, grandson of Moisei Ginzburg, to design the new structure. They expect renovation costs to be under 20,000,000
US Dollar s, while the real estate prices in this area approaches 20,000 USD forsquare meter . Russian code on listed memorial buildings prohibits any major re-planning of internal walls and partitions. At the same time, Ginzburg's original apartment units and corridors are clearly against present-day construction and fire safety codes. They will never be rebuilt, even under the best scenario.March, 2007 gallery
References
Victor Buchli, "An Archaeology of Socialism" (Berg, 2000)
References
External links
* [http://www.maps-moscow.com/index.php?chapter_id=181&data_id=30&do=view_single Moscow Architecture Preservation Society Profile]
* [http://www.nardinirestauro.it/appelli/english_Narkomfin.htm Campaign for the Preservation of the Narkomfin Building]
* [http://www.nicknormal.com/normalblog/2006/11/09/do-svidanja-narkomfin/ Normalblog on the Narkomfin Building]
* [http://www.theartnewspaper.com/article01.asp?id=481 The Art Newspaper on the Narkomfin]
* [http://wordpress.lostclusters.dk/?p=19 Article at Lost Clusters blog]coord|55|45|26|N|37|34|52|E|region:RU-MOW_type:landmark|display=title.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.