- Symphony No. 39 (Michael Haydn)
Michael Haydn 's Symphony No. 39 in C major, Perger 31, Sherman 39, MH 478, written inSalzburg in 1788, is the lastC major symphony he wrote, the sixth of his final set of six symphonies.The symphony is scored for 2
oboe s, 2bassoon s, 2 horns, 2trumpet s,timpani and strings. The edition byH. C. Robbins Landon for Verlag Doblinger has the cellos and basses on the same staff for most of the work even though the cellos occasionally are independent of the bassoons and basses in the first movement. Close to the beginning of the third movement it becomes necessary to split the cellos and basses on to different staves as the cellos switch to tenor clef and double the violas, leaving the bass to the bassoons and basses.The three movements are:
# Allegro con spirito
# Andante, inG major
# Fugato. Molto vivaceThe first movement is notable for its use of horns in G instead of the usual horns in C (compare Haydn's earlier C major symphonies and those of his brother Joseph), so that the horns can participate in the harmonization of ii chords. The music begins straightaway with a triadic theme and bass on the beat, offset by half-beat syncopation in the second violins and violas.
For the recapitulation, the horns change to horns in C. There are even more horn crook changes in store for the players: in the second movement, the first horn switches to horn in E while the second player switches to horn in D, "a clever use ... to increase the range of notes available on instruments without valves." (Robbins Landon, 1967) Robbins Landon also points out that in the Andante of this symphony of Haydn's uses the low C of the second trumpet, something
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart also did later when he wrote his Symphony No. 41 in C major (also written in 1788).The last movement is a vigorous fugato, something else this work has in common with Mozart's Symphony No. 41 and Haydn's own Symphony No. 28 in C major which Mozart certainly studied. Unlike the "Jupiter" Symphony, in this symphony the fugal theme is at its first instance accompanied by its usual countersubject:
Robbins Landon speculates that Mozart also studied Haydn's No. 39 before writing his No. 41, since he "often requested his father Leopold to send him the latest fugue that Haydn had written." (Robbins Landon, 1967) Whether Mozart knew Haydn's later C major symphony has not been proven conclusively by historical means, [Peter Brown, "Eighteenth-Century Traditions and Mozart's "Jupiter" Symphony K.551" "Journal of Musicology" 20 2 (2003): 183. "Mozart's knowledge of another C major Symphony of Michael Haydn, [besides No. 28, Perger 19] P.31/MH 478, finished on 19 February 1788, is more open to question. The sources do not indicate a Viennese distribution, though this does not rule out Mozart's access to the work through his sister Nannerl. In any event, three distinctive traits of this finale are replicated in K.551: 1) the dotted-note fanfares, 2) a moment of "Sturm und Drang", here using the diminished seventh harmony, and 3) ... the more general manner of combining sonata form functions with contrapuntal procedures."] but
Alfred Einstein ranks among the convinced, because of comparisons of the music. [Alfred Einstein, "Mozart: His Character, His Work", translated to English by Arthur Mendel & Nathan Broder. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1945): 127 - 128. "And it is quite certain that we would not have possessed the finale of the 'Jupiter' Symphony in its particular form, in its contrapuntal texture, had it not been for the finale, entitled "Fugato", of a C major symphony of Michael's, dated 19 February 1788. Here no doubt is possible: Ex. 8 [twelve bars of music are quoted in piano reduction] And it this should still be thought an accident, there is the rhythmic motive, which appears at first in the horns: Ex. 9 [bar and half quoted, for two horns in G at written pitch but there is a small mistake involving the first dyad, which is a plain octave C in the Sherman edition but quoted as an E-C sixth in this book] or a counter-motive to the principal theme: Ex. 10 [three bars of music are quoted] —further, the play of syncopation, the introduction of groups of rapid eighth-notes; the juxtaposition of all these motives."] As in the first movement, in the last movement the two horns again begin in G and switch to in C for the recapitulation.Discography
Like the other symphonies of the 1788 set of six, this one is in the CPO disc with Johannes Goritzki conducting the
Deutsche Kammerakademie Neuss . It has also been recorded onBIS Records by the Helsingborg Symphony Orchestra conducted by Hans-Peter Frank, on a disc which also includes Symphonies No.s 27, 30 and 34. The Hungaraton Classic recording of theCapella Savaria conducted by Pál Németh is notable for its use of continuo, which is not indicated by the Landon edition; the bass line for the figured bass realization is the bassoons' and not the celli's.References
* A. Delarte, "A Quick Overview Of The Instrumental Music Of Michael Haydn" "Bob
' s Poetry Magazine" November 2006: 31 [http://bobspoetry.com/Bobs03No.pdf PDF]
* Charles H. Sherman and T. Donley Thomas, "Johann Michael Haydn (1737 - 1806), a chronological thematic catalogue of his works". Stuyvesant, New York: Pendragon Press (1993)
* C. Sherman, "Johann Michael Haydn" in "The Symphony: Salzburg, Part 2" London: Garland Publishing (1982): lxviii
* C. Sherman, Foreword to score of Sinfonia in C, Perger 31 Vienna: Doblinger K. G. (1967)
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.