- 1 − 2 + 4 − 8 + · · ·
In
mathematics , 1 − 2 + 4 − 8 + … is theinfinite series whose terms are the successive powers of two with alternating signs. As ageometric series , it is characterized by its first term, 1, and its common ratio, −2.:
As a series of
real number s it diverges, so in the usual sense it has no sum. In a much broader sense, the series has a generalized sum of 1/3.Historical arguments
Gottfried Leibniz considered the divergent alternating series nowrap|1=1 − 2 + 4 − 8 + 16 − … as early as 1673. He argued that by subtracting either on the left or on the right, one could produce either positive or negative infinity, and therefore both answers are wrong and the whole should be finite::"Now normally nature chooses the middle if neither of the two is permitted, or rather if it cannot be determined which of the two is permitted, and the whole is equal to a finite quantity."Leibniz did not quite assert that the series had a "sum", but he did infer an association with 1/3 following Mercator's method. [Leibniz pp.205-207; Knobloch pp.124-125. The quotation is from "De progressionibus intervallorum tangentium a vertice", in the original Latin: "Nunc fere cum neutrum liceat, aut potius cum non possit determinari utrum liceat, natura medium eligit, et totum aequatur finito."] The attitude that a series could equal some finite quantity without actually adding up to it as a sum would be commonplace in the 18th century, although no distinction is made in modern mathematics. [Ferraro and Panza p.21]
After
Christian Wolff read Leibniz's treatment ofGrandi's series in mid-1712, [Wolff's first reference to the letter published in the "Acta Eruditorum" appears in a letter written fromHalle, Saxony-Anhalt dated 12 June 1712; Gerhardt pp.143-146.] Wolff was so pleased with the solution that he sought to extend the arithmetic mean method to more divergent series such as nowrap|1=1 − 2 + 4 − 8 + 16 − …. Briefly, if one expresses a partial sum of this series as a function of the penultimate term, one obtains either nowrap|(4"m" + 1)/3 or nowrap|(−4"n" + 1)/3. The mean of these values is nowrap|(2"m" − 2"n" + 1)/3, and assuming that nowrap|1="m" = "n" at infinity yields 1/3 as the value of the series. Leibniz's intuition prevented him from straining his solution this far, and he wrote back that Wolff's idea was interesting but invalid for several reasons. The arithmetic means of neighboring partial sums do not converge to any particular value, and for all finite cases one has nowrap|1="n" = 2"m", not nowrap|1="n" = "m". Generally, the terms of a summable series should decrease to zero; even nowrap|1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + … could be expressed as a limit of such series. Leibniz counsels Wolff to reconsider so that he "might produce something worthy of science and himself." [The quotation is Moore's (pp.2-3) interpretation; Leibniz's letter is in Gerhardt pp.147-148, dated 13 July 1712 fromHanover .]Modern methods
Geometric series
Any summation method possessing the properties of regularity, linearity, and stability will sum a
geometric series : .In this case "a" = 1 and "r" = −2, so the sum is 1/3.Euler summation
In his 1755 "Institutiones",
Leonhard Euler effectively took what is now called theEuler transform of nowrap|1 − 2 + 4 − 8 + …, arriving at the convergent series nowrap|1/2 − 1/4 + 1/8 − 1/16 + …. Since the latter sums to 1/3, Euler concluded that nowrap|1=1 − 2 + 4 − 8 + … = 1/3. [Euler p.234] His ideas on infinite series do not quite follow the modern approach; today one says that nowrap|1 − 2 + 4 − 8 + … is Euler summable and that its Euler sum is 1/3. [See Korevaar p.325]The Euler transform begins with the sequence of positive terms::"a"0 = 1,:"a"1 = 2,:"a"2 = 4,:"a"3 = 8, ….
The sequence of
forward difference s is then:Δ"a"0 = "a"1 − "a"0 = 2 − 1 = 1,:Δ"a"1 = "a"2 − "a"1 = 4 − 2 = 2,:Δ"a"2 = "a"3 − "a"2 = 8 − 4 = 4,:Δ"a"3 = "a"4 − "a"3 = 16 − 8 = 8, …,which is just the same sequence. Hence the iterated forward difference sequences all start with nowrap|1=Δ"n""a"0 = 1 for every "n". The Euler transform is the series
:
This is a convergent
geometric series whose sum is 1/3 by the usual formula.Borel summation
The Borel sum of nowrap|1 − 2 + 4 − 8 + … is also 1/3; when
Émile Borel introduced the limit formulation of Borel summation in 1896, this was one of his first examples after 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + … [Smail p. 7.]See also
*
1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + · · ·
*Divergent geometric series Notes
References
*cite book |last=Euler |first=Leonhard |title=Institutiones calculi differentialis cum eius usu in analysi finitorum ac doctrina serierum |year=1755 |url=http://www.math.dartmouth.edu/~euler/pages/E212.html
*cite journal |author=Ferraro, Giovanni and Marco Panza |title=Developing into series and returning from series: A note on the foundations of eighteenth-century analysis |journal=Historia Mathematica |volume=30 |issue=1 |year=2003 |month=February |pages=17–46 |doi=10.1016/S0315-0860(02)00017-4
*cite book |last=Gerhardt |first=C.I. |title=Briefwechsel zwischen Leibniz und Christian Wolf aus den handschriften der Koeniglichen Bibliothek zu Hannover |year=1860 |location=Halle |publisher=H.W. Schmidt |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=5ScCAAAAQAAJ&pg=RA1-PP14
*cite journal |last=Knobloch |first=Eberhard |title=Beyond Cartesian limits: Leibniz’s passage from algebraic to “transcendental” mathematics |journal=Historia Mathematica |volume=33 |year=2006 |pages=113–131 |doi=10.1016/j.hm.2004.02.001
*cite book |last=Korevaar |first=Jacob |title=Tauberian Theory: A Century of Developments |publisher=Springer |year=2004 |id=ISBN 3-540-21058-X
*cite book |last=Leibniz |first=Gottfried |authorlink=Gottfried Leibniz |year=2003 |title=Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, Reihe 7, Band 3: 1672–1676: Differenzen, Folgen, Reihen |S. Probst, E. Knobloch, N. Gädeke, editors |publisher=Akademie Verlag |id=ISBN 3-05-004003-3 |url=http://www.nlb-hannover.de/Leibniz/Leibnizarchiv/Veroeffentlichungen/
*cite book |last=Moore |first=Charles |title=Summable Series and Convergence Factors |publisher=AMS |year=1938 |id=LCC|QA1|.A5225|V.22
*cite book |last=Smail |first=Lloyd |title=History and Synopsis of the Theory of Summable Infinite Processes |year=1925 |publisher=University of Oregon Press |id=LCC|QA295|.S64
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.