- Paul K. Charlton
Paul K. Charlton was one of seven U.S. attorneys dismissed on
December 7 ,2006 by the Bush administration in 2006 for "performance-related issues" (seeDismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy ). ] Subsequent disclosures revealed that that three or more additional attorneys were dismissed under similar circumstances between 2005-2006. Charlton was confirmed as the U.S. Attorney for theUnited States Attorney's Office District of Arizona on November 6, 2001. [http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/nominations/217.html] Charlton was informed of his dismissal by Justice Department officialMichael A. Battle on December 7, 2006, and announced his resignation on December 19, 2006, effective January 31, 2007.Charlton's office had been honored with the Federal Service Award and hailed by the Justice Department as a "model program" for its protection of crime victims. [cite news | first = Max | last = Blumenthal | title = The Porn Plot Against Prosecutors | publisher = The Nation | date =
2007-03-20 | accessdate = 2007-03-21 | url = http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070402/blumenthal ] Charlton ranked in the top third among the nation's 93 US attorneys in contributing to an overall 106,188 federal prosecutions filed in 2006; scored in the top third in number of convictions; oversaw a district in the top five highest in number of immigration-related prosecutions; ranked among the top 20 offices for drug prosecutions; and, unlike in the other seven cases, ranked high in weapons cases, prosecuting 199 of the United States' 9,313 such cases in 2006, the tenth-highest in the country and up four-fold from 2002. [cite news | first = Lara Jakes | last = Jordan | title = Fired U.S. attorneys ranked above peers in prosecutions | publisher = Associated Press | date =2007-03-21 | accessdate = 2007-03-22 | url = http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070321/NEWS08/703210440 ] [cite news | first = Kevin | last = McCoy | title = 3 fired prosecutors were in top 10 for convictions, federal data show | publisher = USA Today | date =2007-03-22 | accessdate = 2007-03-26 | url = http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20070322/1a_bottomstrip22x_dom.art.htm ]United States attorney
In September 2006, it became clear that Charlton had launched an investigation of Rep.
Rick Renzi , R-Ariz, over a land-swap deal. Attorney GeneralAlberto Gonzalez 's chief of staff,Kyle Sampson , subsequently included Charlton on a list of U.S. attorneys "we now should consider pushing out." [cite news | first = Ron | last = Hutcheson | title = Emails detail plans for firing U.S. attorneys | publisher = McClatchy Newspapers | date =2007-03-13 | accessdate = 2007-03-14 | url = http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/16897082.htm ] Sampson made the comment in a Sept. 13, 2006, letter to then-White House CounselHarriet Miers . [cite news | first = Max | last = Blumenthal | title = The Porn Plot Against Prosecutors | publisher = The Nation | date =2007-03-20 | accessdate = 2007-03-21 | url = http://www.thenation.com/doc/20070402/blumenthal ]As recently as February 2005, Charlton had been on the so-called "retain" list.
On March 19, 2007, the White House released 3,000 pages of records connected to the controversy, including emails sent by Charlton to the Justice Department about his dismissal. On Dec. 21, 2006, Charlton sent a message to
William W. Mercer , the third-ranking official in the department, writing, "Media now asking if I was asked to resign over leak in Congressman Renzi investigation." Charlton never received a response. [cite news | first = Mike | last = Madden | title = Renzi inquiry at issue in ouster | publisher = Arizona Republic | date =2007-03-21 | accessdate = 2007-03-21 | url = http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0321usattorney0321.html ]The
Wall Street Journal explained further allegations: that the Department of Justice intentionally delayed part of the investigation of Renzi until after the November 2006 election. They wrote:The delays, which postponed key approvals in the case until after the election, raise new questions about whether Attorney General
Alberto Gonzales or other officials may have weighed political issues in some investigations....Investigators pursuing the Renzi case had been seeking clearance from senior Justice Department officials on search warrants, subpoenas and other legal tools for a year before the election, people close to the case said....
...the investigation clearly moved slowly: Federal agents opened the case no later than June 2005, yet key witnesses didn't get subpoenas until early this year, those close to the case said. The first publicly known search -- a raid of a Renzi family business by the Federal Bureau of Investigation -- was [n't] carried out [until April 2007] ....cite news | title=Delays in Renzi Case Raise More Gonzales Questions | author = John R. Wilke | coauthors=Evan Perez | date=April 25, 2007 | page=A2 | url=http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB117746770608481484-srrsK50Cy6ieok4EIJGcFSnMnek_20070502.html?mod=blogs]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.