- Utahdactylus
Taxobox
name = "Utahdactylus"
fossil_range =Late Jurassic
regnum =Animal ia
phylum = Chordata
classis = Sauropsida
subclassis =Diapsida
genus = "Utahdactylus"
genus_authority = Czerkas and Mickelson, 2002
binomial = "Utahdactylus kateae"
binomial_authority = Czerkas and Mickelson, 2002"Utahdactylus" (meaning "
Utah finger") was agenus ofextinct reptile from theKimmeridgian -Tithonian -ageUpper Jurassic Morrison Formation ofUtah ,USA . Based on DM 002/CEUM 32588 (an incomplete skeleton described as including a fragment of the skull, cervical, back, and caudalvertebra e, ribs, ascapula coracoid , and limb bones), Czerkas and Mickelson (2002) identified as arhamphorhynchoid pterosaur . Bennett (2007) concluded that it has no diagnostic features of thepterosauria , and cannot be positively identified beyond being an indeterminatediapsid .History
The specimen was first described by Stephen Czerkas and Debra Mickelson as a pterosaur, with a long
tail and an estimatedwingspan of 1.20 meters (3.94 feet). The authors considered it to be a rhamphorhynchoid, due to its long tail and large but not elongate cervical vertebrae, but without the typical groove in its forelimb bones.cite book |last=Czerkas |first=Stephen A. |coauthors=and Mickelson, Debra L. |year=2002 |chapter=The first occurrence of skeletal pterosaur remains in Utah |editor=Czerkas, Sylvia J. (ed.) |title=Feathered Dinosaurs and the Origin of Flight |publisher=The Dinosaur Museum |location=Blanding, Utah |pages=3-13 |isbn= 1-93207-501-1] It was regarded as a rhamphorhynchoid based on an unprepared specimen in the most recent review of Morrison pterosaurs.cite book |last=King |first=Lorin R. |coauthors=Foster, John R.; and Scheetz, Rodney D. |chapter=New pterosaur specimens from the Morrison Formation and a summary of the Late Jurassic pterosaur record of the Rocky Mountain region|editor=Foster, John R.; and Lucas, Spencer G. (eds.) |title=Paleontology and Geology of the Upper Morrison Formation |year=2006 |series=New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, 36 |publisher=New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science |location=Albuquerque, New Mexico |pages=149-161 ]In 2007, pterosaur specialist Chris Bennett published a redescription wherein he disagreed with Czerkas' and Mickelson's conclusions. He found several of the bone identifications and interpretations to be mistaken, such as the skull bone (interpreted here as just a bone fragment of unknown origin), elongate tail vertebra (rib), humerus (unknown), and the orientation of the bone described as a scapulacoracoid. He could not locate other bones seen as impressions, and found no evidence to suggest that the identifiable bones came from a pterosaur. In fact, he found the quality of the bones to differ from pterosaur bones. He concluded by identifying it as Diapsida "
incertae sedis ", and a dubious name.cite journal |last=Bennett |first=S. Christopher |year=2007 |title=Reassessment of "Utahdactylus" from the Jurassic Morrison Formation of Utah |journal=Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology |volume=27 |issue=1 |pages=257–260 |doi=10.1671/0272-4634(2007)27 [257:ROUFTJ] 2.0.CO;2 |doilabel=10.1671/0272-4634(2007)27[257:ROUFTJ]2.0.CO;2 ]References
External links
* [http://www.pterosaur.co.uk/species/UJP/unclass/Utadactylus.htm "Utahdactylus"] in The Pterosaur Database
* [http://archosauria.org/pterosauria/taxonomy/genera/utahdactylus.html "Utahdactylus"] in The Pterosauria
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.