- Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board
SCOTUSCase
Litigants=Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board
ArgueDate=October 15
ArgueYear=1991
DecideDate=December 10
DecideYear=1991
FullName=Simon & Schuster , INC., petitioner v. Members of New York StateCrime Victim s Board et al.
USVol=502
USPage=105
Citation=
Prior=On certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Subsequent=
Holding=The New York Son of Sam law violated the First Amendment.
SCOTUS=1991-1993
Majority=O'Connor
JoinMajority=Rehnquist, White, Stevens, Scalia, Souter
Concurrence=Blackmun
Concurrence2=Kennedy
NotParticipating=Thomas
LawsApplied=U.S. Const. amend. I,Son of Sam law "Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board", ussc|502|105|1991, was a Supreme Court case dealing with
Son of Sam laws , which are state laws that prevent convicted criminals frompublishing books about their crime forprofit . The court struck down the Son of Sam law inNew York on the ground that the law was violative of theFirst Amendment , which protectsfree speech . Nevertheless, similar laws in other states remain unchallenged. The opinion of the court was written bySandra Day O'Connor .
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.