- C&A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown, New York
Infobox SCOTUS case
Litigants=C&A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown
ArgueDate=December 7
ArgueYear=1993
DecideDate=May 16
DecideYear=1994
FullName=C & A Carbone, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Town of Clarkstown, New York
USVol=511
USPage=383
Citation=
Prior=
Subsequent=
Holding=Clarkstown's ordinance gave preference to local private industry and was thus unconstitutional under theDormant Commerce Clause
SCOTUS=1993-1994
Majority=Kennedy
JoinMajority=Stevens, Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg
Concurrence=O'Connor
Dissent=Souter
JoinDissent=Rehnquist, Blackmun
NotParticipating=
LawsApplied=U.S. Const. art. I § 8 cl. 3 (Commerce Clause),Dormant Commerce Clause "C&A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown, New York", ussc|511|383|1994 was a case before the
United States Supreme Court in which theplaintiff , a private recycler with business inClarkstown ,New York , sought to ship its non-recyclable waste to cheaper waste processors out-of-state. Clarkstown opposed the move, and the company then brought suit, raising the unconstitutionality of Clarkstown's "flow control ordinance," which requiredsolid waste s that were notrecyclable or hazardous to be deposited at a particular private company's transfer facility. The ordinance involved fees that were above market rates. The Supreme Court sided with the plaintiff, concluding that Clarkstown's ordinance violated the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dormant_Commerce_Clause#Carbone_Decision Dormant Commerce Clause] .ee also
*
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 511
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.