- Philosophical anarchism
Philosophical anarchism is an
anarchist school of thought [Wayne Gabardi, [http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-0554%28198603%2980%3A1%3C300%3AA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-6 review] of "Anarchism" by David Miller, published in "American Political Science Review" Vol. 80, No. 1. (Mar., 1986), pp. 300-302.] which contends that theState lacks moral legitimacy but does not advocate revolution to eliminate it. Though philosophical anarchism does not necessarily imply any action or desire for the elimination of the State, philosophical anarchists do not believe that they have an obligation or duty to obey the State, or conversely, that the State has a right to command.Philosophical anarchism is a component especially of
individualist anarchism . [Outhwaite, William & Tourain, Alain (Eds.). (2003). Anarchism. The Blackwell Dictionary of Modern Social Thought (2nd Edition, p. 12). Blackwell Publishing] Philosophical anarchists of historical note includeWilliam Godwin ,Pierre-Joseph Proudhon ,Benjamin Tucker [Tucker, Benjamin R., "Instead of a Book, by a Man too Busy to Write One: A Fragmentary Exposition of Philosophical Anarchism" (1897, New York)] , andHenry David Thoreau [Broderick, John C. Thoreau's Proposals for Legislation. American Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 3 (Autumn, 1955). p. 285] . Contemporary philosophical anarchists include John Simmons andRobert Paul Wolff .According to scholar
Allan Antliff ,Benjamin Tucker coined the term "philosophical anarchism," to distinguish peaceful evolutionary anarchism from revolutionary variants. [Antliff, Allan. 2001. Anarchist Modernism: Art, Politics, and the First American Avant-Garde. University of Chicago Press. p.4]Variations
Philosophical anarchists may accept the existence of a minimal state as unfortunate, and usually temporary, "necessary evil" but argue that citizens do not have a
moral obligation to obey the state when its laws conflict with individual autonomy. [Klosko, George. Political Obligations. Oxford University Press 2005. p. 4] As conceived byWilliam Godwin , it requires individuals to act in accordance with their own judgements and to allow every other individual the same liberty; conceived egoistically as byMax Stirner , it implies that 'the unique one' who truly 'owns himself' recognizes no duties to others; within the limit of his might, he does what is right for him. [Outhwaite, William & Tourain, Alain (Eds.). (2003). Anarchism. The Blackwell Dictionary of Modern Social Thought (2nd Edition, p. 12). Blackwell Publishing]Rather than throwing bombs or taking up arms to bring down the state, philosophical anarchists "have worked for a gradual change to free the individual from what they thought were the oppressive laws and social constraints of the modern state and allow all individuals to become self-determining and value-creating." [Murphy, Brenda. The Provinceton Platers and the Culture of Modernity. Cambridge University Press 2005. pp. 31-32.] They may oppose the immediate elimination of the state by violent means out of concern that it would be left unsecured against the establishment of a more harmful and oppressive state. This is especially true among those anarchists who consider violence and the state as synonymous, or who consider it counterproductive where public reaction to violence results in increased "law enforcement" efforts.
Notable philosophical anarchists
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.