- Joseph Biggar
Joseph Gillis Biggar (1828–
February 19 1890 ) commonly known as Joe BiggarD.D. Sheehan, " [http://www.gutenberg.org/files/13963/13963-h/13963-h.htm Ireland Since Parnell] ", London: Daniel O'Connor, 1921.] or J. G. Biggar, was an Irish nationalist politician fromBelfast and MP. in the House of Commons of theUnited Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland who served as member of theHome Rule League and laterIrish Parliamentary Party for Cavan from 1874 to 1885 and West Cavan from 1885 to his death in 1890.Origins
Biggar came from a
Presbyterian family and was educated at theBelfast Academy . He became a wealthy Belfast provision merchant and city councillor. He is believed to have converted to Catholicism in 1875 in solidarity with Irish nationalism. He lacked physical presence, being a 'diminutive hunchback'.Obstructionism
He is known for introducing in 1874 a new, more aggressive form of
Obstructionism in theBritish House of Commons . This new form was directed not just at the Government but at the institution itself, and lacked the previous traditional restraint exercised by oppositions who realised that they could expect like treatment when they attained government. This involved giving long speeches to delay passage (also known asfilibuster ing) of Irish coercion acts and to generally obstruct the business of the House in order to force the Liberals and Conservatives to negotiate with Irish nationalists.Malcolm Brown, "The Politics of Irish Literature". Chapter 16 - [http://www.astonisher.com/archives/mjb/irishlit/irishlit_ch16.html Parnell and Davitt] ] Obstruction was opposed by Home Rule Party leaderIsaac Butt but approved of by most Irish nationalists.T. P. O'Connor refers to Biggar's attributes : [T. P. O'Connor . [http://www.gutenberg.org/files/14443/14443-h/14443-h.htm "Sketches In The House"] . London: Ward, Lock & Bowden, 1893]...the obstructionist wants, as a rule, strength of character rather than of oratory - as witness the extraordinary work in obstruction done by the late Mr. Biggar, who, by nature, was one of the most inarticulate of men. It was because Biggar had nerves of steel - a courage that did not know the meaning of fear, and that remained calm in the midst of a cyclone of repugnance, hatred, and menace...
The
...Joe Biggar, his [Parnell's] associate, was also able to speak in any circumstances with exactly the same ease of spirit. To him, speaking was but a means to an end, and whether people listened to him or not - stopped to hang on his words or fled before his grating voice and Ulster accent - it was all one to him.Freeman's Journal reported Biggar's obstruction of the Threshing Machines Bill on February 27 1877 :T. D. Sullivan , " [http://www.quinnipiac.edu/other/abl/etext/irish/trouble/irishpolitics.html Recollections of Troubled Times in Irish Politics] ". Dublin: Sealy, Bryers & Walker/M. H. Gill & Son, 1905]With sturdy Northern resolution, Mr. Biggar in the last hour of the sitting of the House of Commons yesterday, assailed and defeated the Threshing Machines Bill. If your readers ask me why Mr. Biggar defeated the Threshing Machines Bill, I really must confess my inability to inform them. Perhaps it was that the Bill was proposed by Mr. Chaplin, and perhaps Mr. Biggar wished to punish Mr. Chaplin for his attack on Mr. Gladstone. It was a daring thing to do - I mean it was daring in one to get up with the knowledge that you must talk for a half an hour on Threshing Machines. But Mr. Biggar triumphed. Once or twice I really fancied all was over with the hon. member. He, to all appearance, had exhausted every possible branch of his subject, and Mr. Chaplin was already chuckling in anticipation of the break-down of his foe. But no! Mr. Biggar bethought him of "the old flail". It was a moment of inspiration. Who could not talk for fifteen minutes on " the old flail". A groan of mortal anguish escaped Mr. Chaplin as, in eloquently rounded periods, the honourable member for Cavan turned over, ogled, turned over again, and genially touched upon the beauties of flails. At length the hour struck. Mr. Biggar sank down victorious, and Mr. Chaplin rushed in anger from the House.
T. D. Sullivan refers to Biggar's preparation and delaying technique :Of course he could not get the materials for his lengthy discourses "all out of his own head" but he knew whence there was a perfect mine of such matter, and thence he provided himself with supplies. He brought into the House from the Library bundles of parliamentary papers and Blue Books, and from these he proceeded to read copious extracts. Once when he had been at his work for more than two hours, without a pause - except to take an occasional sip of water - the chairman (the House being in Committee), thought to get him to resume his seat by telling him that his observations had become almost inaudible and unintelligible to the chair. Mr. Biggar tendered respectful apologies, said he felt conscious that his voice was growing somewhat indistinct, remarked that he was at rather too great a distance from the chair, but said he would be happy to improve matters by drawing nearer. Thereupon he gathered up his books and papers and moved up, with all the ease and confidence in the world, to the front bench on the opposition side, facing the table of the house - a place reserved by immemorial custom for ex-ministers and their leading supporters. Then, before resuming the thread, or rather the chain-cable- of his discourse, he informed the astonished functionary that if there was any part of his argument which had not reached his ears, he was quite willing to go over it again.
Fenianism
Biggar sympathised with Fenianism but considered reliance on physical force against Britain to be unrealistic. He joined the
Irish Republican Brotherhood after his election to parliament in 1874 and accepted a seat on its Supreme Council, but 'only with a view to winning fenian support for parliamentary politics'. However, his involvement in constitutional politics did not sit well with his more radical IRB colleagues and he was expelled from its Supreme Council in 1876 according to Jackson.Alvin Jackson. "Home Rule. An Irish History 1800-2000", London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2003.] According toT. W. Moody he was expelled in March 1877 on the expiration of the August 1876 ultimatum of the I.R.B.'s supreme council to its members to cease involvement with the home rule movement.The Land War
Biggar served as a nominal joint treasurer on the executive of the
Irish National Land League from its formation on October 21 1879, and was charged on November 2 1880, together with the other Land League leaders, with conspiracy to prevent the payment of rent as violence broke out in theLand War .T. W. Moody . "Davitt and Irish Revolution 1846-82". Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1981]As part of Parnell's attempt to widen the area of land reform agitation while remaining within constitutional bounds, Biggar on March 26, 1882 was elected to the executive committee of the new National Land League of Great Britain.T.W. Moody. "Davitt and Irish Revolution 1846-82". Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1981]
Captain O'Shea
In early 1886 Parnell insisted on nominating Captain O'Shea, the separated husband of
Katharine O'Shea with whom he lived in a family relationship, as the nationalist candidate for Galway - a move widely viewed as an attempt to buy O'Shea's silence.T.M. Healy , who initially opposed the nomination together with Biggar, describes Biggar's attitude to the issue :T. M. Healy , " [http://www.chaptersofdublin.com/books/THealy/healy19.htm Letters and Leaders of My Day. Chapter 19. Captain O'Shea, Nationalist or Liberal? (1886)] ]Parnell's intrigue should not, Biggar said, be allowed to stand in the way of political obligations, and no seat should be sold to a worthless woman's husband. Biggar was not a purist, but urged that private vices should be kept private, and ought not to be imported into political issues. He was prepared to bring about the downfall of Parnell, in spite of the fact that Gladstone was in treaty with him for a Home Rule Bill. I differed.
On February 9 1886 Parnell declared to the voters of Galway that "If my candidate is defeated, the news will spread round the universe that a disaster has overwhelmed Ireland. The world will say, 'Parnell is beaten. Ireland has no longer a leader.'" Biggar split with Parnell over this, declaring "Mr. Chairman, all I have to say is, I can't agree with what you state, and if Mr. Lynch [O'Shea's opponent] goes to the poll I'll support him!".ee also
*
Obstructionism
*Filibuster Notes
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.