- Proof by example
Proof by example (also known as "inappropriate generalisation") is a
logical fallacy whereby one or more examples are claimed as "proof" for a more general statement.This fallacy has the following
argument form ::I know that x X has the property P.:Therefore, all other elements of X have the property P.The following example demonstrates why this is a logical fallacy:: I've seen a person shoot someone.: Therefore, all people are murderers.
This
argument is obviously flawed, but arguments of the same form can sometimes seem superficially convincing, as in the following example::I've seen John's brother steal something. John's family must be thieves.
When valid
However, argument by example is valid when it leads from a singular premise to an "existential" conclusion. For example
:Socrates is wise. :Therefore, someone is wise.
This is an informal version of the logical rule known as Existential Introduction (also known as "Particularisation" or "Existential Generalization").
Formally
;Existential Introduction:: :
ee also
*
Modus ponens
*Affirming the consequent
*Inductive reasoning
*Bayesian probability
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.