- Blas Valera
Blas Valera was born in Chachapoyas in 1545. Although the author of the "
Comentarios Reales de los Incas " believed that Valera was born in Cajamarca, it is proved that he was born in the city of Chachapoyas.Valera is considered to be the son of
Luis Valera , one of the illustrated men who accompanied Pizarro in the conquest. He established himself in this city since its foundation. The mother of this out-standing Chachapoyano writer wasFrancisca Pérez , a native who had taken this name after been baptized.The circumstance that he was born in 1545, less than 20 years of the fall of the
Inca Empire , allowed him to meet many of its prominent men and also old "amauta s", that transmitted and entrusted him the events that he later narrated in his works.He did his first studies in Trujillo and then continued them in Lima. Considering his knowledge of
Quechua , he took part in the missions thatJesuit s had established inHuarochirí , an important pre-Hispanic center ofworship that at the beginning of the XVII century was the location of the most intense eradication campaign of idolatry, carried out byFrancisco de Ávila .He took an active part in the
III Concilio Limense of 1583. Father Valera died inAlcala de Henares ,Spain in 1597.The Priest
His priestly vocation made him travelled to
Lima when he was still a teenager. When he was 17, he joined theCompañía de Jesús (Society of Jesus), where he gave excessive samples of his top intelligence since he began his priestly studies.But at the same time he was preparing for the religious ministy, his love for the
Peru vian history was also growing and, in his insistence of knowing aboutPeru vian past better, he devoted himself to the study of native languages. He became the biggest authority of his time in this subject.This skill made that people entrusted him missions in which his linguistic knowledge was necessary, which simultaneously allowed him to keep on increasing his data gathering, collecting information from the authentic sources of all the places he was visiting.
Valera was a special case in those times: a bilingual
mestizo and well-educated. He was entrusted with the compilation of news from the pre-Hispanic civilization, but the suspicions that his sympathies towards the Inca culture raised made that the Compañía closed the access ofmestizo s in the order and they supposed a negative opinion of him.Because of his knowledge of native languages, he was a valuable collaborator of father José de Acosta, who prepared the first
catechism s inQuechua and Aymara. Thesecatechism s deserved the approval of Toribio de Mogrovejo.On the other hand, there are evidences that Valera was accused of
heresy because he include some favourable comments to theInca Empire . He was shut in by theJesuit s for a brief period.Family
Father
# Luis Valera was a Spanishconquistador born of Bartolome Garcia Roman and Catalina Hernandez in the small town of Aracena in western Andalucia.
# He left for the new world on April 28, 1534, leaving his wife Catalina Rodriguez de Aldana, a noblewoman, in Spain. He would later ask her to rjoin him in the new world 25 years later, and she did so in 1559.
# It is likely that he was a trusted companion ofFrancisco Pizzaro during the conquest, and was loyal to him during the fight withDiego de Almagro .
# He later served as a captain of crossbowmen under one of Pizzaro’s lieutenants, Alonso de Alvarado in 1538.
# After his service, Alvarado granted Valera theencomiendas of Chibalta and Tiapullu, where he mainly raised livestock for sale in Santiago.
# He was regional leader and served on thecabildo , or city council of the regionMother
# A nativePeruvian who was most likely ofInca ancestry who is know by the Christian nameFrancisca Perez .
# She may have been anInca princess in the court of the lateInca emperorAtahualpa , or possibly related to the former governor of Chachapoyas region named Cayo Tupac Rimachi.. Details of her are still relatively unknown, but she either died or left Luis when her son Blas was 15.Brother
# Jeronimo Valera was born eleven years after his brother Blas Valera in the Nieva region of Chachapoyas in the late 1550s. He traveled toSpain as a young child but returned in September of 1559.
# He was raised by Catalina Rodriguez, the fist wife of Luis Valera.
# He studied at the Jesuit College of San Martin in Lima, and became aJesuit on February 25, 1580.
# He made a transition to theFranciscan order on August 21, 1588 mainly due to his brother’s problems with theSpanish Inquisition .
# He later taughttheology and became an inquisition judgeThe writer
Luckily this man, who had the opportunity to know people who were able to provide very valuable information to him, was provided with a remarkable talent that distinguished him from his very early studies. Since he was a very young man, he could realize how important was, for the
Peru vian history, to compile data information about the great Inca culture, which was already becoming extinct as fast as the western culture was imposing in this country.All his works were written in
Latin and, according to his critics, they were written in an elegant, neat and clean style. He narrated events ofPeru vian past with a rigorous critical sense, accepting only the events that were supported by irrefutable evidence. This fact has given the authority to his writings that Garcilaso recognized in them. Many other historians have coincided with Garcilaso's judgment later. Some of them also believed that in other chroniclers' works, there are plagiarisms of the work of this venerableJesuit and even the clandestine use of unpublished documents that he could not release.In 1595, being in
Spain , Valera lost valuable writings in the plundering ofCadiz made by the Englishmen. Some of them were acquired later by Garcilaso, who relates that they were provided him by theJesuit Pedro Maldonado. Maldonado saved the documents, and even though they were burnt and mistreated, Garcilaso thought that they were a valuable source of information with more authenticity and credibility than any other chronicler of the epoch.Occupational Achievements
During Blas Valera’s lifetime he had many important jobs and roles throughout
Peru andSpain . He is most famously known as being a member of theSociety of Jesus , also known as aJesuit . He was a priest where he taughtChristian teachings and performed many sacraments which includedbaptism ,marriage and extreme unction (last rites). He was also concerned with explainingAndean religion inChristian terms and he led spiritual discussions and communal prayer every Wednesday and Friday. Blas Valera was also a writer. He wrote many great works including the Quechua vocabularyVocabulario Quechua andthe Naples Documents . In many of Valera’s documents is he known for defending the Andean society. Along with being a priest and a writer, Valera was also a teacher. He taught freeQuechua classes to the public and translatedChristian religion intoQuechua . He also translated theCatholic Catechism intoQuechua-Third Lima Council Bishops .His works
Between his works, it can be quoted:
*
Vocabulario quechua (Quechua vocabulary)The Vocabulario was one of Blas Valera’s works which resembled an encyclopedia ofPeru and theIncas . It references information on the history of theIncas . Citations from the document can be found in other writers’ works. For example,Giovanni Anello Oliva cited references from the "Vocabulario" of pre-Inca kings of Peru for his argument that there werePeruvian kings before the Incas. Anello Oliva also Valera’s argument that Titu Atauchi, a full brother ofAtahuallpa , led a force in the defeat over Spanish forces at the battle of Huamachuco. It also citesAtahuallpa which the "Vocabulario" gives high praise to and even argues he’s aChristian saint in heaven, displaying Valera’s stance ofAndean Christianity . The sources which he used when writing the "Vocabulario" and other works, do not fully reveal the amount of knowledge he obtained about the native history. Much of the information he used Valera acquired through memories, quipus, and written texts of native elites inPeru , which also have been mostly lost except for information contained in his works. Much of the information contained in the "Vocabulario" has been lost, and the information which has not, has been used for citing other historians’ arguments about the history of theIncas and theAndean civilization.
*Historia de los Incas (History of the Incas)The Naples Document
Blas Valera (1544-1597) was a distinguished member of the
Jesuit missionaries inPeru . He was admired for his knowledge of theAndean language, and renowned for his collaboration in the translation of the official catechism of theThird Lima Council (1582-1583) intoQuechua andAymara . However, in 1583 this storyteller of the Incas, due to unknown reasons, faced rejection from his people, was imprisoned for three years, and later deported fromSpain where he supposedly died in 1597. However, Blas Valera remained an ambiguous character of history until the early 1990’s in which a group of Italian researchers led byLaura Laurencich Minelli discovered a set of documents owned by a private collector inNaples , which included Valera’s writings; yet, with the discovery of these documents, questions to the accuracy of Valera’s life arouse. Controversially, one of the writings found in the Naples documents was dated after Valera’s supposed death in 1597. This erratum of dates led to the assumptions of different versions of the truth. The documents stated that Valera was secretly condemned by his order for his radical pro-Incan beliefs, and especially for his claim thatIncan religion was equivalent toChristianity . There is a version in the documents that assures that after having faked his death, Valera returned toPeru where he wrote the famous "Nueva Corónica y Buen Gobierno" (New chronicle and good government), which has been attributed to the native writerFelipe Guaman Poma de Ayala . The revelation of the "Naples documents," has led to controversial disputes among scholars as to how these documents should be evaluated. Many Andeanists consider the manuscript as forgeries fabricated by the owner Clara Miccinelli and her friend Carlo Animato and argue that the content of these documents cannot be taken literal. Likewise, Francesa Cantú, from the Universitá di Roma, and Maurizio Gnerre, from the Instituto Universitario Orientale, also found documents in public archives in Italy that connect with aspects of the story found in the Naples documents. Likewise, these two scholars have also been accused of manufacturing false documentation. Moreover, many Peruvians argue that the Naples documents were forged by Jesuit followers of Valera after his death in order to express political opinions, which would otherwise be censured by Society. Those pertaining to this chain of thought, also argue that Valera did not write "Nueva Coronica y Buen Gobierno." Lastly, there are those who believe that the Naples documents are authentic and true regarding his fake death and life.In addition, the discovery of the
Naples documents not only raises questions with regards to Valera's life, but also raises assumptions that theIncas had a secret, phonetic writing system and that the writings in "Nueva Coronica y Buen Gobierno" are evidence of indigenous resistance to Spanish domination. Valera's discrete crimes show an attachment to his people, his radical condemnation of the Spanish conquest, and his belief that the Incas understood the key Christian truths. The Naples Documents also talk aboutQuipu writing, which is supposed to be a phonetic form of language that supposedly was used by theIncas , if this is true, many of the secrets and ambiguities from the colonialAndes would be solved.Controversy about his life and works
Lately a few supposed new information on Blas Valera's biography have started to circulate. The most controversial one talks about "
Nueva Crónica y Buen Gobierno " (A new Chronic and a Good Government), ofFelipe Guaman Poma de Ayala . According to specialistLaura Laurencich Minelli , there are three sheets of paper with drawings in the "Historia et Rudimenta Linguae Piruanorum " that have the signature of an "ItalianJesuit ", Blas Valera. According to Minelli, these drawings were made before 1618, that is to say, some years after the official death of Valera.Apparently, the objective of Valera in
Europe was to tell thePope the truth about the conquest of Peru made by Pizarro, who would have poisonedAtahualpa 's soldiers with a mixture ofarsenic andwine . This fact was told to Valera by another conqueror, his own father,Luis Valera . The general of the Compañía,Claudio Aquaviva , didn't agree with Valera's intentions, for this reason he was declared a dead person and was exiled. He went toSpain , where he supposedly shared part of his works with theInca Garcilaso de la Vega .Later, it is said that Valera returned back to
Peru secretly with the intention of publishing his version of the Peruvian conquest. he got in touch with other twoJesuit s:Joan Antonio Cumis andJoan Anello Oliva . To carry out their intention, the three of them had to hide the identity of the real author, so they used the name of Huaman Poma de Ayala. When he carried out his assignment, Blas Valera would have returned toSpain in 1618, where he supposedly died a little time later.The enigma of knowing who was the real writer of "
Nueva Crónica y Buen Gobierno " and also about the biographical mess of Blas Valera have not still been solved.Exile
One of the major controversaries about Blas Valera was the dates in which he was in prison, and when he was in exile. While many believe that Blas Valera was constantly in prison, there were times that it
Hyland proved Valera was in exile by theJesuits , south ofPeru . After he was arrested by theJesuits with the accuse of fortification, he was sent secretly to exile by the Spanish government. While in exile is believed that Valera taught theQuechan language to the Jesuits, so the Jesuits were able to communicate with the Incas, and understand what they were saying with theQuipus .Imprisonment
Blas Valera entered his underground prison cell in April 1583 on charges of fornication brought on by
General Aquaviva . Valera’s sentence started with four years in prison, followed by a follow up hearing. During this four-year stay in prison, Valera suffered forced fasting, prayer and weekly mortification. After the four years had passed, theJesuits offered Valera a chance to leave the society. He of course rejected the offer and continued to claim innocence. As a result, theJesuits sentenced him to six years of house arrest. Due to the horrible conditions in prison, Valera had grown very ill. He requested to be sent back toSpain to recover and get away. TheJesuits approved his request, and exiled him toSpain in 1594. Blas Valera died inSpain in 1597. The controversy of Valera’s imprisonment comes from the actual crime he committed against the society. According to theJesuits , after Valera’s appointment to professor of grammar inPotosí , Aquavia sent a letter of concern to the society about Valera in February 1583. The contents of this letter are secret, but historians suspect it dealt with Valera’s teachings. Following this letter, in April 1583 the society brought charges offornication and found him guilty. Thefornication supposedly took place with one of Valera’s female students.The Naples Documents show another story untold by theJesuits . According to the documents, Valera’s writings onInca religion and potential heretical techniques had caused the society to take action against him. No evidence has ever been uncovered to prove either of these indictments brought against Valera.Death
After being exiled from
Peru , Valera arrived inCádiz in 1596. Valera continued a peaceful life until later on that year pirateRobert Devereux invaded Cadiz beating local priests. Valera at the age of 53 was morally wounded and would die on April 2, 1597.However, some argue Valera’s death in Cadiz was faked and he came back to Peru to complete other works.Anello Oliva wrote about Valera’s faked death in the "Historia et Rudimenta". Apparently, Valera was given a choice to leave theJesuits or fake his own death. Not wanting to leave theJesuit society, Valera faked his own death in Cadiz 1596, after Devereux roamed the city beating priests. Valera left Cadiz and headed back toPeru in June 1598, where he resided with a group of natives inCuzco . It is believed Valera wrote the "Nueva coronica y buen gobierno" at the age of sixty-six. Valera’s work was attributed to Guaman Poma, since Valera was supposedly dead. If Valera secretly wrote the Nueva aboutAndean life, this will change modern understanding of theIncas and early colonial life in Peru.Anello Oliva argues that Valera contributed to writings inthe Naples Documents , but some believe thatAnello Oliva used Valera’s name as a means to respect the dead Valera and publish anti-Spanish beliefs that were forbidden at the time. But, there is not sufficient evidence to prove or falsify Valera’s faked death.ources
Hyland, Sabine. The Jesuit & the Incas: The Extraordinary Life of Padre Blas Valera, S.J. (The University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI) 2003.
http://www.press.umich.edu/pdf/0472113534-ch1.pdf
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.